Intercarpal arthrodesis: A systematic review.

Intercarpal arthrodesis is a well-established option to treat various disorders of the carpus, such as localized osteoarthritis, carpal instability, and Kienböck's disease. This is a non-conservative procedure aimed at obtaining a stable and congruent interface between the radius and the proximal carpal row, which restores wrist function by minimizing pain and restoring grip strength. These procedures generally yield good predictable results that are maintained over time. However, all intracarpal arthrodesis procedures cause a loss of wrist range of motion. To optimize outcomes and minimize complications, especially nonunion, this surgery may require a learning curve. A precise surgical technique for preparing the bone surfaces, bringing enough bone graft, and using reliable fixation is essential. Since the late 1960s, several intracarpal arthrodesis procedures have been described. Commonly used fusions target the scaphotrapeziotrapezoid, scaphocapitate, four corners, capitolunate or capitohamatolunate regions. Lesser used fusions focus on specific lesions such as the scapholunate, scapholunocapitate, lunotriquetral and triquetrohamate. Here, we propose a systematic review of the various types of intercarpal arthrodesis procedures described in the literature. After having described each arthrodesis, we specify their indications, the variations of the surgical techniques, and then present an overview of the results and complications. Finally, we discuss how these surgeries affect wrist biomechanics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Scaphotrapeziotrapezoid arthrodesis for isolated osteoarthritis: results at a mean 8 years' follow-up.

The aim of this retrospective study was to report medium- to long-term outcome of scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) arthrodesis with staple fixation to treat painful isolated osteoarthritis (OA). Twenty-one consecutive patients (22 wrists) who had undergone STT arthrodesis were retrospectively reviewed by an independent examiner. Clinical and radiological evaluation was performed. At a mean follow-up of 8 years (range 2-20 years), pain levels were significantly decreased, and functional scores were significantly improved. Grip and pinch strength were 86% and 82% of those of the contralateral side. Wrist range of motion in flexion-extension and radial-ulnar deviation was significantly less than on the contralateral side at last follow-up (104° vs. 131° and 38° vs. 55°, respectively). Non-union was found on X-ray in 4 wrists (18%), but in 2 cases showed as partial non-union on CT, with complete scaphotrapezial consolidation; 1 of the 4 wrists required surgical revision. Another patient was re-operated on for symptomatic external staple displacement without non-union. There were 8 cases (36%) of radiographic narrowing of the styloscaphoid joint space; contact between the staple and styloid was found in all 8 cases. Four patients (18%) had narrowing of the scaphocapital joint space; protrusion of the proximal part of the staple into the joint space was noted in all 4 wrists. No differences were found for the radioscaphoid, capitolunate and scapholunate angles before and after surgery. STT arthrodesis with staple fixation to treat isolated STT OA led to a significant reduction in pain, with improved strength and functional scores. To avoid styloid impingement, we recommend systematic styloidectomy. Complete non-union seems to be overestimated on radiographs. Partial non-union with scaphotrapezial union should not be considered as a complication. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.