The steroid receptor RNA activator protein is recruited to promoter regions and acts as a transcriptional repressor.

Products of the steroid receptor RNA activator (SRA1) gene have the unusual property to function both at the RNA and the protein levels. SRA-RNA has long been known to increase the activity of multiple nuclear receptors. It has more recently been proposed than steroid receptor RNA activator protein (SRAP) also modulates steroid receptors activity. Herein, we show for the first time that SRAP physically interacts with multiple transcription factors and is recruited to specific promoter regions. Artificially recruiting SRAP to the promoter of a luciferase reporter gene under the control of the strong transcriptional activator VP16 leads to a decrease in transcription. Altogether we propose that SRAP could be a new transcriptional regulator, able to function as a repressor through direct association with promoters.

The protein encoded by the functional steroid receptor RNA activator is a new modulator of ER alpha transcriptional activity.

The steroid receptor RNA activator gene (SRA1) encodes for a functional RNA (SRA) as well as a protein (SRAP). While several groups reported on SRA-RNA mechanism of action, SRAP exact function remains to be elucidated, mainly due to a lack of studies investigating the function of the protein independently of its RNA counterpart. Using two independent models to examine its specific functions, SRAP was found to enhance estrogen receptor alpha activity in a ligand and response-element dependent manner. Our data therefore suggest that both transcript and protein products of the SRA1 gene co-modulate the transcriptional activity of steroid receptors.

Steroid Receptor RNA Activator Protein (SRAP): a potential new prognostic marker for estrogen receptor-positive/node-negative/younger breast cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: The steroid receptor RNA activator is a functional RNA suspected to participate in the mechanisms underlying breast tumor progression. This RNA is also able to encode for a protein, Steroid Receptor RNA Activator Protein (SRAP), whose exact function remains to be determined. Our aim was to assess, in a large breast cancer cohort, whether levels of this protein could be associated with outcome or established clinical parameters. METHODS: Following antibody validation, SRAP expression was assessed by tissue-microarray (TMA) analysis of 372 breast tumors. Clinical follow-up and parameters such as steroid receptor and node status were available for all the corresponding cases. Immunohistochemical scores were independently determined by three investigators and averaged. Statistical analyses were performed using standard univariate and multivariate tests. RESULTS: SRAP levels were significantly (Mann-Whitney rank sum test, P < 0.05) higher in estrogen receptor-alpha positive (ER+, n = 271), in progesterone receptor positive (PR+, n = 257) and in older patients (age > 64 years, n = 182). When considering ER+ tumors, PR+ tumors, or younger patients (< or = 64 years), cases with high SRAP expression had a significantly (Mantel-Cox test, P < 0.05) worse breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) than those with low SRAP levels. SRAP also appeared as a very powerful indicator of poor prognostic for BCSS in the subset of ER+, node negative and young breast cancer patients (Cox regression analysis, n = 60, BCSS Hazard Ratio = 8.61, P < 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that SRAP levels might provide additional information on potential risk of recurrence and negative outcome in a specific set of patients with otherwise good prognosis when considering only estrogen receptor and nodal status.

Increasing the relative expression of endogenous non-coding Steroid Receptor RNA Activator (SRA) in human breast cancer cells using modified oligonucleotides.

Products of the Steroid Receptor RNA Activator gene (SRA1) have the unusual property to modulate the activity of steroid receptors and other transcription factors both at the RNA (SRA) and the protein (SRAP) level. Balance between these two genetically linked entities is controlled by alternative splicing of intron-1, whose retention alters SRAP reading frame. We have previously found that both fully-spliced SRAP-coding and intron-1-containing non-coding SRA RNAs co-exist in breast cancer cell lines. Herein, we report a significant (Student's t-test, P < 0.003) higher SRA-intron-1 relative expression in breast tumors with higher progesterone receptor contents. Using an antisense oligoribonucleotide, we have successfully reprogrammed endogenous SRA splicing and increased SRA RNA-intron-1 relative level in T5 breast cancer cells. This increase is paralleled by significant changes in the expression of genes such as plasminogen urokinase activator and estrogen receptor beta. Estrogen regulation of other genes, including the anti-metastatic NME1 gene, is also altered. Overall, our results suggest that the balance coding/non-coding SRA transcripts not only characterizes particular tumor phenotypes but might also, through regulating the expression of specific genes, be involved in breast tumorigenesis and tumor progression.

Alternative splicing of the first intron of the steroid receptor RNA activator (SRA) participates in the generation of coding and noncoding RNA isoforms in breast cancer cell lines.

The Steroid Receptor RNA Activator 1 (SRA1) has originally been described as a noncoding RNA specifically activating steroid receptor transcriptional activity. We have, however, identified, in human breast tissue, exon- 1 extended SRA1 isoforms containing two initiating AUG codons and encoding a protein we called SRAP. We recently reported a decreased estrogen receptor activity in breast cancer cells overexpressing SRAP, suggesting antagonist roles played by SRA1 RNA and SRAP. SRA1 appears to be the first example of a molecule active both at the RNA and at the protein level. No data are currently available regarding the mechanisms possibly involved in the generation of coding and noncoding functional SRA1 RNAs. Using 5'-Rapid Amplification of cDNA Extremities (5'-RACE), we have herein identified several putative transcription initiation sites surrounding the second methionine codon and used to generate coding SRA1 transcripts. In the process, we also identified an alternatively spliced noncoding SRA1 transcript still containing an intron-1 sequence. Using targeted RT-PCR approaches, we confirmed the presence in breast cancer cell lines of SRA1 RNAs containing a full as well as a partial intron-1 sequence and established that the relative proportion of these RNAs varied within breast cancer cell lines. Using a "minigene" strategy, we also showed that artificial RNAs containing the SRA1 intron-1 sequence are alternatively spliced in breast cancer cell lines. Interestingly, the splicing pattern of the minigene products parallels the one of the endogenous SRA1 transcripts. Altogether, our data suggest that the primary genomic sequence in and around intron-1 is sufficient to lead to a differential splicing of this intron. We propose that alternative splicing of intron-1 is one mechanism used by breast cancer cells to regulate the balance between coding and functional noncoding SRA1 RNAs.

Identification of an octamer-binding site controlling the activity of the small breast epithelial mucin gene promoter.

e human small breast epithelial mucin (SBEM) gene has been identified as being preferentially expressed in mammary epithelial cells and over-expressed in breast tumors. In this report, we have characterized the promoter of SBEM gene in order to identify sequences responsible for this strong mammary expression. A series of SBEM promoter/luciferase constructs were transiently transfected into both breast (MCF-7, BT-20) and non-breast (HeLa and HepG2) cell lines. In addition to the minimal promoter and to a repressor region, we have identified an 87-bp sequence (-357/-270) driving a strong breast-specific expression. Site-directed mutagenesis of a putative octamer-binding transcription factor binding site located within this latter region led to a strong decrease of the transcriptional activity of the SBEM promoter. Furthermore, transient over-expression of Oct1 and Oct2 not only increased SBEM promoter reporter activity, but also enhanced endogenous SBEM mRNA level. Overall, the data suggest that octamer-binding transcription factors participate in the strong expression of SBEM gene in breast tissues. Clarifying the SBEM gene regulation will help to dissect mechanisms underlying transcription of normal breast and breast cancer-associated genes.

The steroid receptor RNA activator protein is expressed in breast tumor tissues.

The steroid receptor RNA activator (SRA) was originally described as the first functional noncoding RNA able to specifically coactivate the activity of steroid receptors. We previously demonstrated the existence in breast cancer cell lines of new SRA isoforms that, as opposed to the first cloned SRA RNA, encode for a 236-amino acid protein, SRAP. To investigate the possible implications of the coding SRA RNA and SRAP expression on breast cancer progression, we examined by Western blot analysis 74 primary breast tumors of patients subsequently treated with tamoxifen. Patients whose primary tumors were positive for SRAP expression (n = 24) had a significantly (Kaplan-Meier survival curve p = 0.047) lower likelihood of dying from recurrent disease than SRAP-negative patients (n = 50). We generated 2 cell lines, SRAP-V5-High.A and SRAP-V5-High.B, by stably overexpressing SRAP in the estrogen receptor-positive MCF-7 breast cancer cell line. Transient transfection experiments, performed using a luciferase reporter gene under the control of an estrogen-responsive element, revealed decreased sensitivity to estradiol but no additional sensitivity to tamoxifen in SRAP-overexpressing cells. Overall, our data suggest that the presence of both coding SRA RNA and its corresponding SRAP modifies the activity of estrogen receptor in breast cancer cells and that SRAP could be a new clinical marker for breast cancer. Further studies are needed to define the respective mechanisms of action and the roles of SRA RNA and protein in breast tumorigenesis and tumor progression.