Adjusting Current Hemoglobin Thresholds: A Way to Improve Outcome in Women Undergoing Major Surgery.

Background/Objective: In the perioperative setting, a suboptimal total hemoglobin (Hb) mass puts women and men at an unreasonable disadvantage. Anemia is an independent risk factor for transfusion, postoperative complications, and mortality. The Hb cut-off value for women was set at <12.0 g/dL by the World Health Organization (WHO) and has been rigorously debated for decades. The aim of this study was to elucidate the risk for postoperative complications in female patients with Hb levels < 12.0, 12.0-12.9, and ≥13.0 g/dL. Material and Methods: Single-center retrospective analysis of female patients undergoing major surgery. Results: In total, 6,516 patients ≥18 years of age had major surgery between 2018 and 2019 and 2,446 female patients were included in analysis. Mean age was 67.4 ± 16.6, 66.4 ± 15.6, and 64.5 ± 15.5 years in female patients with preoperative Hb levels <12.0, 12.0-12.9 and ≥13.0 g/dL, respectively. The transfusion rate of red blood cells (RBCs) was significantly higher in female patients with Hb <12.0 g/dL (53%) and with Hb 12.0-12.9 g/dL (31%) compared to female patients ≥13.0 g/dL (22%). Rates of pneumonia, acute kidney injury, and sepsis were significantly higher in patients with Hb <12.0 and 12.0-12.9 g/dL compared to patients with Hb ≥13.0 g/dL. Total length of hospital stay was significantly longer in female patients with Hb <12.0 g/dL than patients with Hb 12.0-12.9 g/dL and Hb ≥13.0 g/dL (10 days vs. 8 days). Conclusion: Taken together, our data show that Hb values below 12.9 g/dL are associated with increased probability of RBC transfusions and increased risk of postoperative complications. In addition, our results indicate that postoperative outcomes for women might be optimized by increasing cut-off values for anemia. The call to revise the anemia threshold for women by the WHO can no longer be disregarded.

Preoperative hemoglobin thresholds for survival equity in women and men.

Anemia affects humans throughout life, and is linked to higher morbidity and mortality. Unclear is whether hemoglobin values are equivalent between women and men. This study evaluates the association of preoperative hemoglobin levels with in-hospital mortality and estimates thresholds for survival equity between men and women. All adult patients undergoing surgery between 2010 and 2019 from 14 German hospitals were included in the study. Thresholds for survival equity were determined with generalized additive models. In total, 842,130 patients with a median in-hospital follow-up time of 7 days were analyzed. During follow-up 20,370 deaths occurred. Preoperative hemoglobin stratified in-hospital mortality (log-rank test p < 0.001) and was associated with mortality independently of demographic risk, surgical risk and health status. For each 1 g/dL reduction in preoperative hemoglobin, the odds of mortality increased by a factor of 1.22 (95% CI 1.21-1.23, p < 0.001). A preoperative hemoglobin threshold of 10.5 g/dL reflected equivalent risk for both male and female patients. Hemoglobin levels below 10.5 g/dL had higher risk of mortality for women than for men. The findings from this study aid evidence-based thresholds, inform anemia management and promote equitable care, thus enhancing patient outcomes.

Anaemia and red blood cell transfusion in women with placenta accreta spectrum: an analysis of 38,060 cases.

Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) has become a significant life-threatening issue due to its increased incidence and associated morbidity and mortality. Pregnancy is often associated with states of anaemia, and severe maternal haemorrhage represents a major risk factor for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. The present study retrospectively analyzed the prevalence of anaemia, transfusion requirements and outcome in women with PAS. Using data from the German Statistical Office pregnant patients with deliveries hospitalized between January 2012 and December 2021 were included. Primary outcome was the prevalence of anemia and administration of RBCs. Secondary outcome were complications in women with PAS who received RBC transfusion. In total 6,493,606 pregnant women were analyzed, of which 38,060 (0.59%) were diagnosed with PAS. The rate of anaemia during pregnancy (60.36 vs. 23.25%; p < 0.0001), postpartum haemorrhage (47.08 vs. 4.41%; p < 0.0001) and RBC transfusion rate (14.68% vs. 0.72%; p < 0.0001) were higher in women with PAS compared to women without PAS. Women with PAS who had bleeding and transfusion experienced significantly more peripartum complications than those who did not. A multiple logistic regression revealed that the probability for RBC transfusion in all pregnant women was positively associated with anaemia (OR 21.96 (95% CI 21.36-22.58)). In women with PAS, RBC transfusion was positively associated with the presence of renal failure (OR 11.27 (95% CI 9.35-13.57)) and congestive heart failure (OR 6.02 (95% CI (5.2-7.07)). Early anaemia management prior to delivery as well as blood conservation strategies are crucial in women diagnosed with PAS.

Current concepts in postpartum anemia management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Postpartum anemia (PPA) is common in women after childbirth and affects about 50-80% of all women worldwide. Iron deficiency (ID) is the main cause for anemia and constitutes a potentially preventable condition with great impact on the mother's physical and mental condition after delivery. In most cases, PPA is associated with antenatal ID and peripartum blood losses. Numerous published studies confirmed the positive effect of PPA diagnosis and treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: Iron deficiency as well as iron deficiency anemia (IDA) are common in the postpartum period and represent significant health problems in women of reproductive age. SUMMARY: Important movements towards early detection and therapy of postpartum anemia have been observed. However, postpartum anemia management is not implemented on a large scale as many healthcare professionals are not aware of the most recent findings in the field. Diagnosis and therapy of PPA, particularly iron supplementation in ID and IDA, has proven to be highly effective with a tremendous effect on women's wellbeing and outcome.

Effect of using smaller blood volume tubes and closed blood collection devices on total blood loss in patients undergoing major cardiac and vascular surgery.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic laboratory tests are an integral part of managing hospitalized patients. In particular, patients in the intensive care units (ICUs) can experience a concerning amount of blood loss due to diagnostic testing, which can increase the risk developing iatrogenic anemia. Several interventions exist to curtail avoidable blood loss, for example computerized decision support, smaller phlebotomy tubes, and other blood conservation devices. Nevertheless, use of these interventions is not standardized. Therefore, the objective of our study was to quantify the daily phlebotomy volume taken from patients who had undergone major cardiac or vascular surgery. METHODS: We estimated the number of blood analyses and volumes of drawn blood of 400 consecutive patients (≥ 18 yr) undergoing major cardiac or vascular surgery. The amount of blood saved using small-volume tubes and in combination with blood conservation device rather than standard-volume tubes was estimated for serum chemistry (serum), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) tubes, sodium citrate coagulation (SCC) tubes, and arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis. RESULTS: The mean total blood loss due to phlebotomy drawing using standard-volume tubes during hospitalization was 167.9 mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 158.0 to 177.8), 255.6 mL (95% CI, 226.5 to 284.6), and 695.3 mL (95% CI, 544.1 to 846.4) for patients undergoing cardiac surgery with a hospital length of stay (LOS) of 0-10, 11-20, and ≥ 21 days, respectively. The mean total blood loss due to phlebotomy during hospitalization was 80.5 mL (95% CI, 70.5 to 90.6), 225.0 mL (95% CI, 135.1 to 314.8 mL) and 470.3 mL (95% CI, 333.5 to 607.1) for vascular surgery patients with LOS 0-10, 11-20, and ≥ 21 days, respectively. Patients with at least a two-day stay at the ICU had a mean blood loss of 146.6 mL (95% CI, 134.6 to 158.6 mL) and those with ≥ 11 days incurred a loss of 1,428 mL (95% CI, 1,117.8 to 1,739.2). The use of closed blood collection device and small-volume tubes (serum, EDTA, SCC, and ABG) reduced blood loss by 82.8 mL for patients with an ICU stay of 2 days and up to 824.0 mL for patients with a ICU stay of ≥ 11 days. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic laboratory tests are associated with significant patient blood loss, but are a modifiable risk factor. The use of small-volume tubes and closed blood collection devices decreases the volume of patient blood drawn for analysis and prevents blood waste.

RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: Les tests diagnostiques de laboratoire font partie intégrante de la prise en charge des personnes hospitalisées. Plus spécifiquement, la patientèle des unités de soins intensifs (USI) peut perdre une quantité inquiétante de sang en raison des tests de diagnostic, ce qui peut augmenter le risque d'anémie iatrogène. Plusieurs interventions existent pour réduire les pertes de sang évitables, par exemple une aide à la décision informatisée, des tubes de phlébotomie plus petits et d'autres dispositifs de conservation du sang. Néanmoins, le recours à ces interventions n'est pas normalisé. Par conséquent, l'objectif de notre étude était de quantifier le volume quotidien de phlébotomie prélevée chez des patient·es ayant bénéficié d'une chirurgie cardiaque ou vasculaire majeure. MéTHODE: Nous avons estimé le nombre d'analyses sanguines et les volumes de sang prélevés de 400 personnes consécutives (≥ 18 ans) bénéficiant d'une chirurgie cardiaque ou vasculaire majeure. La quantité de sang économisée à l'aide de tubes de petit volume et en combinaison avec un dispositif de conservation du sang plutôt que des tubes de volume standard a été estimée pour la chimie sérique (sérum), les tubes d'acide éthylène-diamine-tétra-acétique (EDTA), les tubes de coagulation au citrate de sodium (CCS) et l'analyse des gaz du sang artériel (GSA). RéSULTATS: La perte sanguine totale moyenne due au prélèvement de phlébotomie à l'aide de tubes de volume standard pendant l'hospitalisation était de 167,9 mL (intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, 158,0 à 177,8), 255,6 mL (IC 95 %, 226,5 à 284,6) et 695,3 mL (IC 95 %, 544,1 à 846,4) chez les patient·es bénéficiant d'une chirurgie cardiaque avec une durée de séjour à l'hôpital de 0 à 10, 11 à 20, et ≥ 21 jours, respectivement. La perte sanguine totale moyenne due à la phlébotomie pendant l'hospitalisation était de 80,5 mL (IC 95 %, 70,5 à 90,6), 225,0 mL (IC 95 %, 135,1 à 314,8 mL) et 470,3 mL (IC 95 %, 333,5 à 607,1) chez les patient·es ayant bénéficié d'une chirurgie vasculaire avec des durées de séjour de 0-10, 11-20 et ≥ 21 jours, respectivement. Les patient·es ayant séjourné au moins deux jours à l'USI ont eu une perte de sang moyenne de 146,6 mL (IC 95 %, 134,6 à 158,6 mL) et celles et ceux ayant séjourné ≥ 11 jours ont subi une perte de 1428 mL (IC 95 %, 1117,8 à 1739,2). L'utilisation d'un dispositif de prélèvement sanguin fermé et de tubes de petit volume (sérum, EDTA, SCC et gsa) a réduit la perte de sang de 82,8 mL pour les patient·es ayant séjourné à l'USI 2 jours et jusqu'à 824,0 mL pour les patient·es ayant séjourné en USI ≥ 11 jours. CONCLUSION: Les tests de laboratoire diagnostiques sont associés à une perte de sang importante chez les patient·es, mais constituent un facteur de risque modifiable. L'utilisation de tubes de petit volume et de dispositifs fermés de prélèvement sanguin diminue le volume de sang prélevé pour analyse et prévient le gaspillage de sang.

Use of cell salvage in obstetrics in Germany: analysis of national database of 305 610 cases with peripartum haemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: One of the leading causes of maternal death worldwide is severe obstetric haemorrhage after childbirth. Use of intraoperative cell salvage is strongly recommended by international guidelines on patient blood management. Recent data provide strong evidence that use of cell salvage in obstetrics is effective and safe in women with postpartum haemorrhage resulting in fewer transfusion-related adverse events and shorter hospital stay. We retrospectively analysed the use of cell salvage in bleeding women during delivery for a period of 10 yr in German hospitals. METHODS: Data from the German Federal Statistical Office were used that covers all in-hospital birth deliveries from 2011 to 2020. Prevalence of peripartum haemorrhage (pre-, intra-, and post-partum haemorrhage), comorbidities, peripartum complications, administration of blood products, and use of cell salvage were analysed. RESULTS: Of 6 356 046 deliveries in Germany, 305 610 women (4.8%) suffered from peripartum haemorrhage. Of all women with peripartum haemorrhage, postpartum haemorrhage was the main cause for major obstetric haemorrhage (92.33%). Cell salvage was used in only 228 (0.07%) of all women with peripartum haemorrhage (cell salvage group). In women undergoing Caesarean delivery with postpartum haemorrhage, cell salvage was used in only 216 out of 70 450 women (0.31%). CONCLUSION: Cell salvage during peripartum haemorrhage is rarely used in Germany. There is tremendous potential for the increased use of cell salvage in peripartum haemorrhage nationwide.

Reported outcomes in patients with iron deficiency or iron deficiency anemia undergoing major surgery: a systematic review of outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Iron deficiency (ID) is the leading cause of anemia worldwide. The prevalence of preoperative ID ranges from 23 to 33%. Preoperative anemia is associated with worse outcomes, making it important to diagnose and treat ID before elective surgery. Several studies indicated the effectiveness of intravenous iron supplementation in iron deficiency with or without anemia (ID(A)). However, it remains challenging to establish reliable evidence due to heterogeneity in utilized study outcomes. The development of a core outcome set (COS) can help to reduce this heterogeneity by proposing a minimal set of meaningful and standardized outcomes. The aim of our systematic review was to identify and assess outcomes reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies investigating iron supplementation in iron-deficient patients with or without anemia. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov systematically from 2000 to April 1, 2022. RCTs and observational studies investigating iron supplementation in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of ID(A), were included. Study characteristics and reported outcomes were extracted. Outcomes were categorized according to an established outcome taxonomy. Quality of outcome reporting was assessed with a pre-specified tool. Reported clinically relevant differences for sample size calculation were extracted. RESULTS: Out of 2898 records, 346 underwent full-text screening and 13 studies (five RCTs, eight observational studies) with sufficient diagnostic inclusion criteria for iron deficiency with or without anemia (ID(A)) were eligible. It is noteworthy to mention that 49 studies were excluded due to no confirmed diagnosis of ID(A). Overall, 111 outcomes were structured into five core areas including nine domains. Most studies (92%) reported outcomes within the 'blood and lymphatic system' domain, followed by "adverse event" (77%) and "need for further resources" (77%). All of the latter reported on the need for blood transfusion. Reported outcomes were heterogeneous in measures and timing. Merely, two (33%) of six prospective studies were registered prospectively of which one (17%) showed no signs of selective outcome reporting. CONCLUSION: This systematic review comprehensively depicts the heterogeneity of reported outcomes in studies investigating iron supplementation in ID(A) patients regarding exact definitions and timing. Our analysis provides a systematic base for consenting to a minimal COS. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020214247.

Extract from the 2022 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular assessment and management of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery - Patient Blood Management.

The 2022 Guidelines on cardiovascular assessment and management of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery of the European Society of Cardiology are an update on the previous guidelines reported in 2014. The revised guidelines provide standardized perioperative cardiovascular management of surgical patients and emphasis on risk assessment of the patient combined with the inherent risk of the surgical procedure. One of the novelties in these guidelines is the Patient Blood Management programme, which is based on a three pillar concept: preoperative hemoglobin optimization, minimize iatrogenic blood loss and bleeding, and harness tolerance to anemia in an effort to improve patient outcome. In this review, we highlight the three pillars of Patient Blood Management and recommendations made by the 2022 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular assessment and management of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

German Patient Blood Management Network: effectiveness and safety analysis in 1.2 million patients.

BACKGROUND: Patient Blood Management (PBM) is a patient-centred, systematic, evidence-based approach to improve patient outcomes by managing and preserving a patient's own blood whilst promoting patient safety and empowerment. The effectiveness and safety of PBM over a longer period have not yet been investigated. METHODS: We performed a prospectively designed, multicentre follow-up study with non-inferiority design. Data were retrospectively extracted case-based from electronic hospital information systems. All in-hospital patients (≥18 yr) undergoing surgery and discharged between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2019 were included in the analysis. The PBM programme focused on three domains: preoperative optimisation of haemoglobin concentrations, blood-sparing techniques, and guideline adherence/standardisation of allogeneic blood product transfusions. The outcomes were utilisation of blood products, composite endpoint of in-hospital mortality and postoperative complications (myocardial infarction/ischaemic stroke/acute renal failure with renal replacement therapy/sepsis/pneumonia), anaemia rate at admission and discharge, and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 1 201 817 (pre-PBM: n=441 082 vs PBM: n=760 735) patients from 14 (five university/nine non-university) hospitals were analysed. Implementation of PBM resulted in a substantial reduction of red blood cell utilisation. The mean number of red blood cell units transfused per 1000 patients was 547 in the PBM cohort vs 635 in the pre-PBM cohort (relative reduction of 13.9%). The red blood cell transfusion rate was significantly lower (P<0.001) with odds ratio 0.86 (0.85-0.87). The composite endpoint was 5.8% in the PBM vs 5.6% in the pre-PBM cohort. The non-inferiority aim (safety of PBM) was achieved (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of >1 million surgical patients showed that the non-inferiority condition (safety of Patient Blood Management) was fulfilled, and PBM was superior with respect to red blood cell transfusion. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02147795.

[Implementation of Patient Blood Management as Standard-of-Care]. / Etablierung eines Patient Blood Managements als Behandlungsstandard.

Anaemia is among the most common co-morbidity in surgical patients. However, it often remains unrecognized and untreated, which results in an increased requirement for allogeneic blood products and complications. Patient Blood Management offers patient-centred and evidence-based therapies and preventive measures for anaemia. Patient Blood Management is composed of 3 main pillars: pre-operative anaemia management, blood loss reduction and the rational use of allogeneic blood products. The World Health Organization demands the implementation of Patient Blood Management measures since 2010. However, a comprehensive implementation of Patient Blood Management as a standard-of-care is still not achieved. Here, we describe the need for a comprehensive Patient Blood Management implementation and highlight several specific Patient Blood Management measures.

Is a Patient Blood Management programme economically reasonable?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The value of healthcare is defined as the achieved health outcome in relation to the incurred costs. Patient Blood Management (PBM) is a multidisciplinary, evidence-based and patient-centred concept to optimize the patients' red blood cell mass, minimize blood loss and bleeding and to secure the physiological reserve, including the promotion of evidence-based transfusion strategies. This review describes the healthcare value and the cost effectiveness of single PBM measures as well as the implementation of comprehensive PBM programmes. RECENT FINDINGS: Overall, measures improving surgical outcome and reducing hospital length of stay, such as intravenous iron supplementation in iron deficient anaemic patients, the use of antifibrinolytic agents for the treatment of bleeding, the use of cell salvage and adherence to an evidence-based transfusion strategy, are associated with cost savings. SUMMARY: Although several single PBM measures have been shown to be effective and cost-efficient, it remains challenging to compare the results among differing healthcare systems.

How do I/we forecast tomorrow's transfusion? A focus on recipients' profiles.

Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is a life-saving medical intervention and has an essential role in the management of surgical patients. However, blood donations and supply levels are decreasing, therefore there is an unmet need for the accurate prediction of the transfusion probability for surgical patients. Multiple methods have been established to predict the need for RBC transfusion. Maximum surgical blood order schedules are widely used in the clinical setting. However, these lists are not designed to accurately predict RBC utilization for an individual case as factors such as preoperative haemoglobin level, total body blood volume, comedications are not considered. Artificial intelligence and related technologies based on machine learning modelling are valuable alternatives to predict transfusion probability taking into account patient individual risk factors including among others comorbidities, laboratory parameters, use of oral anticoagulation, ASA score, surgeon's ID or applied blood saving measures. Overall, forecasting the need for a RBC transfusion can facilitate personalized medicine, quality assurance, decrease blood wastage, decrease costs, and increase patient safety. Furthermore, transfusion prediction models could facilitate blood management strategies before surgery.

Association of anaemia, co-morbidities and red blood cell transfusion according to age groups: multicentre sub-analysis of the German Patient Blood Management Network Registry.

BACKGROUND: Blood transfusions are common medical procedures and every age group requires detailed insights and treatment bundles. The aim of this study was to examine the association of anaemia, co-morbidities, complications, in-hospital mortality, and transfusion according to age groups to identify patient groups who are particularly at risk when undergoing surgery. METHODS: Data from 21 Hospitals of the Patient Blood Management Network Registry were analysed. Patients were divided into age subgroups. The incidence of preoperative anaemia, co-morbidities, surgical disciplines, hospital length of stay, complications, in-hospital mortality rate, and transfusions were analysed by descriptive and multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1 117 919 patients aged 18-108 years were included. With increasing age, the number of co-morbidities and incidence of preoperative anaemia increased. Complications, hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality increased with age and were higher in patients with preoperative anaemia. The mean number of transfused red blood cells (RBCs) peaked, whereas the transfusion rate increased continuously. Multivariate regression analysis showed that increasing age, co-morbidities, and preoperative anaemia were independent risk factors for complications, longer hospital length of stay, in-hospital mortality, and the need for RBC transfusion. CONCLUSION: Increasing age, co-morbidities, and preoperative anaemia are independent risk factors for complications, longer hospital length of stay, in-hospital mortality, and the need for RBC transfusion. Anaemia diagnosis and treatment should be established in all patients.

Evaluation of a Clinical Decision Support System for the most evidence-based approach to managing perioperative anticoagulation.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We explored the feasibility of a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) to guide evidence-based perioperative anticoagulation. DESIGN: Prospective randomised clinical management simulation multicentre study. SETTING: Five University and 11 general hospitals in Germany. PARTICIPANTS: We enrolled physicians (anaesthesiologist (n = 73), trauma surgeons (n = 2), unknown (n = 1)) with different professional experience. INTERVENTIONS: A CDSS based on a multiple-choice test was developed and validated at the University Hospital of Frankfurt (phase-I). The CDSS comprised European guidelines for the management of anticoagulation in cardiology, cardio-thoracic, non-cardio-thoracic surgery and anaesthesiology. Phase-II compared the efficiency of physicians in identifying evidence-based approach of managing perioperative anticoagulation. In total 168 physicians were randomised to CDSS (PERI-KOAG) or CONTROL. MEASUREMENTS: Overall mean score and association of processing time and professional experience were analysed. The multiple-choice test consists of 11 cases and two correct answers per question were required to gain 100% success rate (=22 points). MAIN RESULTS: In total 76 physicians completed the questionnaire (n = 42 PERI-KOAG; n = 34 CONTROL; attrition rate 54%). Overall mean score (max. 100% = 22 points) was significantly higher in PERI-KOAG compared to CONTROL (82 ± 15% vs. 70 ± 10%; 18 ± 3 vs. 15 ± 2 points; P = 0.0003). A longer processing time is associated with significantly increased overall mean scores in PERI-KOAG (≥33 min. 89 ± 10% (20 ± 2 points) vs. <33 min. 73 ± 15% (16 ± 3 points), P = 0.0005) but not in CONTROL (≥33 min. 74 ± 13% (16 ± 3 points) vs. <33 min. 69 ± 9% (15 ± 2 points), P = 0.11). Within PERI-KOAG, there is a tendency towards higher results within the more experienced group (>5 years), but no significant difference to less (≤5 years) experienced colleagues (87 ± 10% (19 ± 2 points) vs. 78 ± 17% (17 ± 4 points), P = 0.08). However, an association between professional experience and success rate in CONTROL has not been shown (71 ± 8% vs. 70 ± 13%, 16 ± 2 vs. 15 ± 3 points; P = 0.66). CONCLUSIONS: CDSS significantly improved the identification of evidence-based treatment approaches. A precise usage of CDSS is mandatory to maximise efficiency.

The impact of intravenous iron supplementation in elderly patients undergoing major surgery.

BACKGROUND: Age and preoperative anaemia are risk factors for poor surgical outcome and blood transfusion. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of iron supplementation in iron-deficient (ID) elderly patients undergoing major surgery. METHOD: In this single-centre observational study, patients ≥ 65 years undergoing major surgery were screened for anaemia and ID. Patients were assigned to the following groups: A- (no anaemia); A-,ID+,T+ (no anaemia, iron-deficient, intravenous iron supplementation); A+ (anaemia); and A+,ID+,T+ (anaemia, iron-deficient, intravenous iron supplementation). RESULTS: Of 4,381 patients screened at the anaemia walk-in clinic, 2,381 (54%) patients were ≥ 65 years old and 2,191 cases were included in analysis. The ID prevalence was 63% in patients with haemoglobin (Hb) < 8 g/dl, 47.2% in patients with Hb from 8.0 to 8.9 g/dl, and 44.3% in patients with Hb from 9 to 9.9 g/dl. In severely anaemic patients, an Hb increase of 0.6 (0.4; 1.2) and 1.2 (0.7; 1.6) g/dl was detected with iron supplementation 6-10 and > 10 days before surgery, respectively. Hb increased by 0 (-0.1; 0) g/dl with iron supplementation 1-5 days before surgery, 0.2 (-0.1; 0.5) g/dl with iron supplementation 6-10 days before surgery, and 0.2 (-0.2; 1.1) g/dl with supplementation > 10 days before surgery (p < 0.001 for 1-5 vs. 6-10 days). Overall, 58% of A+,ID+,T+ patients showed an Hb increase of > 0.5 g/dl. The number of transfused red blood cell units was significantly lower in patients supplemented with iron (0 (0; 3)) compared to non-treated anaemic patients (1 (0; 4)) (p = 0.03). Patients with iron supplementation > 6 days before surgery achieved mobility 2 days earlier than patients with iron supplementation < 6 days. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous iron supplementation increases Hb level and thereby reduces blood transfusion rate in elderly surgical patients with ID anaemia.

Preoperative anaemia and red blood cell transfusion in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid and intracerebral haemorrhage - a multicentre subanalysis of the German PBM Network Registry.

PURPOSE: Anaemia is common in patients presenting with aneurysmal subarachnoid (aSAH) and intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). In surgical patients, anaemia was identified as an idenpendent risk factor for postoperative mortality, prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS) and increased risk of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. This multicentre cohort observation study describes the incidence and effects of preoperative anaemia in this critical patient collective for a 10-year period. METHODS: This multicentre observational study included adult in-hospital surgical patients diagnosed with aSAH or ICH of 21 German hospitals (discharged from 1 January 2010 to 30 September 2020). Descriptive, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the incidence and association of preoperative anaemia with RBC transfusion, in-hospital mortality and postoperative complications in patients with aSAH and ICH. RESULTS: A total of n = 9081 patients were analysed (aSAH n = 5008; ICH n = 4073). Preoperative anaemia was present at 28.3% in aSAH and 40.9% in ICH. RBC transfusion rates were 29.9% in aSAH and 29.3% in ICH. Multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative anaemia is associated with a higher risk for RBC transfusion (OR = 3.25 in aSAH, OR = 4.16 in ICH, p < 0.001), for in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.48 in aSAH, OR = 1.53 in ICH, p < 0.001) and for several postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative anaemia is associated with increased RBC transfusion rates, in-hospital mortality and postoperative complications in patients with aSAH and ICH. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02147795, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02147795.

[Peri- and Postoperative Anaemia Management]. / Outcome-relevante Anästhesiologie: peri- und postoperative Anämiebehandlung.

Patient Blood Management (PBM) aims to diagnose and treat preoperative anaemia, avoid unnecessary blood loss, and enable rational use of blood products. Due to various limitations, treatment of preoperative anaemia has been successful in only a few German hospitals to date. Thus, the peri- and postoperative phase is increasingly becoming important for implementing various preventive and therapeutic measures for the treatment of (postoperative) anaemia. These will be comprehensively presented in the following.