Diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI for patients with suspicious nipple discharge and negative mammography and ultrasound: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI in identifying lesions requiring excision for patients with suspicious nipple discharge but normal mammograms and ultrasounds. METHODS: Between September 2013 and May 2019, 106 female participants (mean age 57.9 years) were consecutively included in this prospective multicenter study; 102 were retained for analysis. MRI was considered negative in the absence of suspicious enhancement and positive in cases of ipsilateral abnormal enhancement (BI-RADS 3 to 5). Final diagnoses were based on histological findings of surgical or percutaneous biopsies or at 1-year follow-up. We considered all lesions requiring excision found on pathology (papilloma, atypia, nipple adenomatosis, or cancer) as positive results. We considered spontaneous resolution of the discharge at 1 year as a negative result. RESULTS: MRI showed ipsilateral abnormal enhancement in 54 patients (53%) revealing 46 lesions requiring excision (31 benign papillomas, 5 papillomas with atypia, 2 nipple adenomatosis, and 8 cancers) and 8 benign lesions not requiring excision. No suspicious enhancement was found in the remaining 48 participants (47%). Forty-two were followed up at 1 year with spontaneous resolution of the discharge and six underwent surgery (revealing 2 benign papillomas). MRI diagnostic accuracy for the detection of a lesion requiring excision was as follows: sensitivity 96%, specificity 85%, positive predictive value 85%, and negative predictive value 96%. CONCLUSION: In patients with suspicious nipple discharge and normal mammogram and ultrasound, MRI demonstrates excellent performance to identify lesions for which excision is required. Normal MRI indicates it is safe to propose follow-up only management, thus avoiding unnecessary duct excision. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02819362 KEY POINTS: • Breast MRI can be useful for the management of patients with suspicious nipple discharge and negative mammogram and ultrasound. • MRI detected a lesion requiring excision in 46 participants (45%) with unexplained discharge. • If breast MRI is negative, follow-up is a safe alternative for these patients.

Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Women With Local Ductal Carcinoma in Situ to Optimize Surgical Outcomes: Results From the Randomized Phase III Trial IRCIS.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the addition of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to standard radiologic evaluation on the re-intervention rate in women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) undergoing breast-conserving surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with biopsy-proven DCIS corresponding to a unifocal microcalcification cluster or a mass less than 30 mm were randomly assigned to undergo MRI or standard evaluation. The primary end point was the re-intervention rate for positive or close margins (< 2 mm) in the 6 months after randomization ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01112254). RESULTS: A total of 360 patients from 10 hospitals in France were included in the study. Of the 352 analyzable patients, 178 were randomly assigned to the MRI arm, and 174 were assigned to the control arm. In the intent-to-treat analysis, 82 of 345 patients with the assessable end point were reoperated for positive or close margins within 6 months, resulting in a re-intervention rate of 20% (35 of 173) in the MRI arm and 27% (47 of 172) in the control arm. The absolute difference of 7% (95% CI, -2% to 16%) corresponded to a relative reduction of 26% (stratified odds ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.1; P = .13). When considering only the per-protocol population with an assessable end point, the difference was 9% (stratified odds ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.35 to 1.0; P = .05). Total mastectomy rates were 18% (31 of 176) in the MRI arm and 17% (30 of 173) in the control arm (stratified P = .93). For 100 lesions seen on MRI, nonmass-like enhancement was more predominant (82%) than mass enhancement (20%). Nevertheless, no specific morphologic and kinetic parameters for DCIS were identified. CONCLUSION: The study did not show sufficient surgical improvement with the use of preoperative MRI to be clinically relevant in DCIS staging. However, this could be reconsidered with the improvement of new MRI sequences and new modalities in magnetic resonance techniques.

A rare case of a giant ulcerated benign phyllode tumor.

Phyllode tumors are rare fibroepithelial neoplasms divided into three histological grades according to their potential for malignancy. Low grade tumors are usually smaller with a slower evolution. We present here the case of a 40 year old women presenting an augmentation over one month of the volume of her right breast with an ulcerated mass measuring 25cm. The clinical characteristics were in favor as a malignant tumor. The radiological findings were not contributive and the pathologic examinations of the biopsies were benign. A therapeutic and diagnostic mastectomy was thus performed and the final pathologic examination confirmed a benign phyllode tumor. These rare tumors are very deceitful for the radiologic investigations are poorly contributive. Likewise, the pathologic examination can be incorrect. Biopsies must be repeated and a mastectomy performed if any doubts remain.

Clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF): benign breast tumors - short text.

Screening with breast ultrasound in combination with mammography is needed to investigate a clinical breast mass (Grade B), colored single-pore breast nipple discharge (Grade C), or mastitis (Grade C). The BI-RADS system is recommended for describing and classifying abnormal breast imaging findings. For a breast abscess, a percutaneous biopsy is recommended in the case of a mass or persistent symptoms (Grade C). For mastalgia, when breast imaging is normal, no MRI or breast biopsy is recommended (Grade C). Percutaneous biopsy is recommended for a BI-RADS category 4-5 mass (Grade B). For persistent erythematous nipple or atypical eczema lesions, a nipple biopsy is recommended (Grade C). For distortion and asymmetry, a vacuum core-needle biopsy is recommended due to the risk of underestimation by simple core-needle biopsy (Grade C). For BI-RADS category 4-5 microcalcifications without any ultrasound signal, a minimum 11-G vacuum core-needle biopsy is recommended (Grade B). In the absence of microcalcifications on radiography cores additional samples are recommended (Grade B). For atypical ductal hyperplasia, atypical lobular hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ, flat epithelial atypia, radial scar and mucocele with atypia, surgical excision is commonly recommended (Grade C). Expectant management is feasible after multidisciplinary consensus. For these lesions, when excision margins are not clear, no new excision is recommended except for LCIS characterized as pleomorphic or with necrosis (Grade C). For grade 1 phyllodes tumor, surgical resection with clear margins is recommended. For grade 2 phyllodes tumor, 10mm margins are recommended (Grade C). For papillary breast lesions without atypia, complete disappearance of the radiological signal is recommended (Grade C). For papillary breast lesions with atypia, complete surgical excision is recommended (Grade C).

Breast MR biopsy: Pathological and radiological correlation.

PURPOSE: To identify pathological features for sample analysis of magnetic resonance imaging-guided vaccum-assisted breast biopsy (MRIgVaBB) to optimize radio pathological correlation and identify discordant benign result. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Databases of two centres were queried to identify MRIgVaBB performed between January 2009 and February 2013. A cohort of 197 women (mean age: 54.5 years (24-77)) with 208 lesions was identified. We retrospectively analyzed all prebiopsy MRI examinations according to the new BI-RADS lexicon, and all biopsy samples to describe the lesion of interest, its interface with the surrounding breast tissue and other associated features. RESULTS: The malignancy rate was 26.0 % (54/208) with an underestimation rate of 15.67 % (5/32). A visible interface at pathology between a biopsied lesion and the surrounding breast tissue was more frequently identified in mass enhancement compared to NME or focus (p = 0.0003). Regional NME was correlated with a high degree of fibrosis (p = 0.001) and the presence of PASH (p = 0.0007). Linear or segmental NME was correlated with the presence of periductal mastitis (p = 0.0003). CONCLUSION: The description of a visible interface between the target lesion and the surrounding tissue is crucial to confirm the correct targeting of an MR mass or a NME. KEY POINTS: • Pathological interface correlated with magnetic resonance mass and focal non-mass enhancement (NME). • Linear or segmental NME correlated with mastitis or ductal carcinoma in situ. • Fibrosis and pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia (PASH) are correlated with regional NME.

[Pregnancy after cancer: for whom and when?]. / Grossesse après cancer: pour qui et quand ?

Planning a pregnancy for patients with a history of cancer, including breast cancer, is a clinical situation that becomes more and more common. Several specific items are to be discussed: decrease of fertility after cancer treatment, fertility preservation options, impact of pregnancy on cancer recurrence risk and appropriate interval between cancer and pregnancy. Programming pregnancy after cancer is doable in a multidisciplinary setting, and begins at cancer diagnosis to anticipate the various specific pitfalls. Favor adequate oncologic care remains the leading rule.

Added value of one-view breast tomosynthesis combined with digital mammography according to reader experience.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the added value of one-view breast tomosynthesis in adjunct with mammography to characterize breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our institutional ethics committees approved the study and granted a waiver of informed consent. One hundred fifty-five women (mean age, 51.3 years, range: 24-92 years) who systematically underwent mammography and breast tomosynthesis with subsequent percutaneous biopsy were analyzed. Four radiologists (two seniors, R1 and R2, and two juniors, R3 and R4 with 30, 10, 3 and 1 years of experience in breast imaging, respectively) independently reviewed exams in two steps: mammography alone and tomosynthesis in adjunct with mammography. The lesions in the cohort included 39.3% (61/155) cancers, 2.5% (4/155) high-risk lesions and 58.1% (90/155) benign lesions. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to compare the results of the two readings. RESULTS: There was almost perfect agreement irrespective of reader experience for the reading of the mammography in adjunct with tomosynthesis, whereas agreement was poor between junior and senior readers for the reading of mammography alone. Area under the ROC (Az) values for the tomosynthesis in adjunct with mammography were significantly better than Az values for mammography alone for all readers except the most experienced, for whom only a tendency was noted. The proportion of cancers undiagnosed by mammography alone that were well diagnosed by tomosynthesis in adjunct with mammography was 6.5% (4/61), 13.1% (8/61), 27.8% (17/61) and 26.2% (16/61) for Readers 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. The proportion of false positive cases induced by the addition of breast tomosynthesis to mammography was 2.1% (2/94), 2.1% (2/94), 9.5% (9/94) and 12.7% (12/94) for Readers 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. CONCLUSION: Adding breast tomosynthesis to mammography improved sensitivity and negative predictive value for all readers except for the most experienced one, in whom only a tendency for improvement was noted.

Comparison of two nomograms to predict pathologic complete responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: evidence that HER2-positive tumors need specific predictors.

The aim of this study is to compare two published nomograms, the "Institut Gustave Roussy/M.D. Anderson Cancer Center" (IGR/MDACC) and the Colleoni nomograms, in predicting pathologic complete responses (pCR) to preoperative chemotherapy in an independent cohort and to assess the impact of HER2 status. Data from 200 patients with breast carcinoma treated with preoperative chemotherapy were collected. We calculated pCR rate predictions with the two nomograms and compared the predictions with the outcomes. Sixty percent of the patients with HER2-positive tumors received trastuzumab concomitantly with taxanes. Model performances were quantified with respect to discrimination and calibration. In the whole population, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the IGR/MDACC nomogram and the Colleoni nomogram were 0.74 and 0.75, respectively. Both of them underestimated the pCR rate (P = 0.026 and 0.0005). When patients treated with trastuzumab were excluded, the AUC were excellent: 0.78 for both nomograms with no significant difference between the predicted and the observed pCR (P = 0.14 and 0.15). When the specific population treated with trastuzumab preoperatively was analyzed, the AUC for the IGR/MDACC nomogram and the Colleoni nomogram were poor, 0.52 and 0.53, respectively. The IGR/MDACC and the Colleoni nomograms were accurate in predicting the probability of pCR after preoperative chemotherapy in the HER2-negative population but did not correctly predict pCR in the HER2-positive patients who received trastuzumab. This suggests that responses to preoperative chemotherapy, including trastuzumab, are biologically driven and that a specific nomogram or predictor for HER2-positive patients has to be developed.

Nonmasslike enhancement at breast MR imaging: the added value of mammography and US for lesion categorization.

PURPOSE: To determine the value of adding conventional imaging (mammography and ultrasonography [US]) to nonmasslike enhancement (NMLE) analysis with breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for predicting malignancy and for building an interpretation model incorporating all imaging modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional ethics committees approved the study and granted a waiver of informed consent. In 115 women (mean age, 48.3 years; range, 21-76 years; 56 malignant, 12 high-risk, and 63 benign lesions), 131 NMLE lesions were analyzed. Two independent readers first classified MR images by using descriptive Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) criteria (BI-RADS classification with MR images alone [BI-RADS(MR)]) and later repeated this classification, adding information from conventional imaging (BI-RADS classification with combination of MR images and conventional images [BI-RADS(MR+Con)]). Lesion diagnosis was established with surgical histopathologic findings (n = 68), percutaneous biopsy results (n = 25), or 2 years of stability at MR imaging (n = 38). Receiver operating characteristic curves were built to compare BI-RADS(MR) with BI-RADS(MR+Con). A multivariate interpretation model was constructed and validated in a distinct cohort of 44 women. RESULTS: Values for inter- and intraobserver agreement, respectively, were better for BI-RADS(MR+Con) (κ = 0.847 and 0.937) than for BI-RADS(MR) (κ = 0.748 and 0.861). For both readers, the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) for diagnosis of malignancy were also superior when BI-RADS(MR+Con) (AUC = 0.91 [reader 1] and 0.93 [reader 2]) was compared with BI-RADS(MR) (AUC = 0.84 [reader 1] and 0.87 [reader 2]) (P < .05). An interpretation model combining conventional imaging with MR imaging criteria showed very good discrimination (AUC = 0.89 [training set] and 0.90 [validating set]). CONCLUSION: Adding conventional imaging to NMLE lesion characterization at breast MR imaging improved the diagnostic performance of radiologists, and the interpretation model used offers good accuracy with the potential to optimize the reproducibility of NMLE analysis at MR imaging.

Multiple synchronous (multifocal and multicentric) breast cancer: clinical implications.

Multifocality in breast cancer is a frequent phenomenon, whose prevalence may vary between 13 and 75%. The differences in estimation of the prevalence of multifocality across studies may be explained by the differing definitions used for multifocality and multicentricity; this inconsistency makes it difficult to analyze the literature on the subject. The incidence of multifocality is probably often underestimated. Currently, the diagnosis relies on imaging. The performance of mammography is relatively low, but the addition of breast ultrasonography can improve diagnostic sensitivity. Recently, breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to be more accurate for detecting multifocality compared to conventional imaging. However, this modality is associated with high rates of false-positives that could result in inappropriate disease management. Thus, the use of MRI is not recommended as a first-line technique for diagnosing multifocality. The diagnosis of multifocality is important for breast cancer management, particularly with regards to the choice of surgery. A finding of multifocality may spur a decision to perform a wider excision that will avoid positive margins. Regarding the results of conservative surgery in the presence of multifocality, studies are contradictory, and no international consensus exists. Multifocality may also modify the management of the axillary basin; studies have shown that multifocality is associated to an over-risk of 20% of lymph node invasion. The sentinel node biopsy has been considered as an alternative to complete axillary lymph node dissection by the American Society of Clinical Oncology. The prognostic value of multifocality is still not well known, although some studies have suggested that it is associated with a worst prognosis. Further studies are needed to better assess the impact of multifocality on breast cancer prognosis.

Site-select procedure for non-palpable breast lesions: feasibility study with a 15-mm cannula.

BACKGROUND: As screening mammography becomes more commonplace, increasing numbers of non-palpable breast lesions are being found. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the feasibility, utility, and patient-perceived cosmesis and satisfaction of the Site-Select procedure in women with non-palpable breast lesions. METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients underwent the Site-Select procedure, performed under local anesthesia by the same surgeon. The Site-Select procedure was included in a protocol for small (<15 mm) breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) grade 3 and 4 breast lesions. The pathologic diagnosis, specimen size, length of the procedure, perioperative and postoperative complications, subsequent interventions, patient satisfaction, and esthetic results were documented. RESULTS: The Site-Select procedure was successful in all 32 patients (mean age, 56 years; range, 44-79 years). Mammographic lesions corresponded to microcalcifications in 21 patients, microcalcifications with architectural distortion in 4 patients, microcalcifications with nodules in 2 patients, and architectural distortion alone in 5 patients. The Site-Select procedure was used on an outpatient basis. Carcinomas were diagnosed in five patients (15.6%). No complications occurred during the procedure. The only postoperative complication was a hematoma, which did not require surgical drainage. No missed cancers were detected by follow-up mammography (mean 8 months later; range, 1-18 months). The esthetic results and patient satisfaction were excellent. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the Site-Select procedure is an effective diagnostic method in selected cases. It has a low complication rate, high patient satisfaction, and excellent esthetic results.