Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Laryngeal Palpation Pain Scale (LPPS).

INTRODUCTION: One of the most important assessment and therapy methods for patients with muscle tension dysphonia (MTD) and other voice disorders is laryngeal palpation. However, there is no comprehensive scale for measuring pain during laryngeal palpation. The goal of the present study was to develop and validate a new scale to evaluate pain during palpation for patients with MTD. METHODS: The present study consisted of two phases: (1) Development of the Laryngeal Palpation Pain Scale (LPPS) based on an in-depth literature review, the palpatory evaluation of MTD patients, interviews with experts in the field of voice disorders, and consultation with a registered pain expert, and (2) evaluation of the validity and reliability of the LPPS. The validity of the LPPS was investigated using qualitative and quantitative content validity, qualitative face validity, discriminant validity, and convergent validity. Content validity of the LPPS was assessed by experts' opinions (10 speech-language pathologists and five laryngologists), and face validity was investigated using the opinions of speech-language pathologists. The reliability of the LPPS was determined using test-retest and inter-rater reliability. RESULTS: The item generation phase of the study led to the development of a scale to assess pain during palpation that included eleven locations in the neck region for palpatory assessment. These 11 items were divided into 13 different items (neck locations) based on the opinions of the experts. The content validity ratio values of all scale items were higher than 0.78. The content validity index (CVI) value for each of the items of the scale was higher than 0.79 and for the entire scale CVI (S-CVI) was 0.915. The results of the reliability of the LPPS items were satisfactory with weighted kappa values ranging from 0.655 to 1 for the test-retest and 0.77-1 for the inter-rater reliability. Convergent validity of the LPPS was shown with a significant positive correlation (r = 0.68) between the LPPS and the pain severity of vocal tract discomfort (P < 0.001). Moreover, MTD patients had more pain severity than the control group in all items of the LPPS (P < 0.05) except for the submental item (P = 0.89). These results indicate that the LPPS can differentiate MTD patients from healthy subjects. The final version of the LPPS includes 13 potential pain locations. The severity of pain at each of these locations is determined on a numeric pain rating scale of zero (no pain) to ten (the most severe pain). CONCLUSION: The study showed that the LPPS is a valid and reliable scale to assess pain in MTD patients during palpation evaluations. More studies are recommended for further psychometric evaluation of the LPPS including responsiveness to change (the use in before-and-after intervention studies) and concurrent validity of the LPPS. The LPPS can be used for clinical and research purposes.

Development and Preliminary Validation of a Pain Scale Specific to Patients With Voice Disorders: The Voice-Related Pain Scale (VRPS).

INTRODUCTION: Although pain is one of the complaints reported by voice patients, still there is no valid and reliable scale to evaluate pain in Patients with Voice Disorders (PWVDs). Therefore, the aim of the present study was to develop and validate the Voice-Related Pain Scale (VRPS). METHODS: The present study was conducted in two stages: (1) development of the VRPS based on semistructured interviews with PWVDs and experts in the field of voice disorders and an in-depth literature review, and (2) Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the VRPS. Determining the validity and reliability of the VRPS was performed using qualitative and quantitative content validity, the qualitative face validity, and the test-retest reliability. Content validity of the VRPS was assessed by Speech and Language Pathologists who are experts in the assessment and treatment of voice patients and laryngologist. The reliability of the scale was determined using test-retest reliability. RESULTS: Based on the interviews with PWVDs and experts, and a thorough review of the related literature, a self-reported scale with 11 items and three sections was developed. The three items included ear, temporomandibular joint, and shoulder all of which were divided into right and left pairs based on the experts' suggestion. One item was eliminated because it had a content validity ratio less than 0.62. The content validity index (CVIs) for all the remaining items were higher than 0.79 and the scale content validity index was equal to 0.93. The test-retest reliability was satisfactory with weighted kappa ranging from 0.64 to 1 for VRPS items. The final version of the VRPS comprised of 13 items related to the pain location in the human body. Each of these items has three sections: frequency of pain, severity of pain, and time of pain occurrence. CONCLUSION: The present study indicated that VRPS is a valid and reliable tool to evaluate pain in PWVDs. The VRPS is a useful tool for clinical and research purposes. However, more studies are needed in this regard for further evaluation of the VRPS.

Development and psychometric evaluation of a scale to measure telepractice among speech and language pathologists during COVID-19 pandemic.

PURPOSE: With the outbreak of the COVID-19 and the need for physical distancing, the provision of Speech-Language Pathology (SLP) services via telepractice has been essential. One of the first steps in this field is the need to study telepractice among Speech and Language Pathologists (SLPs). However, there is currently no specific instrument to measure telepractice in SLP to achieve this aim. The present study was conducted to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of a questionnaire to investigate telepractice among SLPs during the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study comprised of two stages: (1) development of the questionnaire according to an in-depth literature review and (2) evaluation of the validity and reliability of the questionnaire. The content validity of the instrument was determined by 10 experts in the field of SLP. To check the face validity of the questionnaire, 10 SLPs were interviewed and their opinions were incorporated in the questionnaire. A total of 221 SLPs completed the questionnaire to determine the construct validity and the internal consistency. To evaluate the test-retest reliability, 30 SLPs completed the questionnaire twice with two weeks of interval. RESULTS: The final version of the questionnaire comprised of three sections and 31 items. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for different sections of the questionnaire ranged between 0.902 and 0.92 and the Intra-class Correlation coefficients of the sections were found to be between 0.9 and 0.96 in the test-retest reliability. CONCLUSIONS: The questionnaire developed in the study is a valid and reliable scale to measure telepractice among SLPs for educational or research purposes.