Spectrum of renal allograft biopsy: A five-year experience at a tertiary care center of Eastern India.

Renal allograft dysfunction (RAD) can have myriad causes and presentations. Allograft biopsy remains the gold standard for optimum management. This is a retrospective study carried out at a tertiary care institute from August 2011 to March 2016. Details of the renal allograft biopsy requisitions were recorded and analyzed. Two hundred and two patients had undergone kidney transplantation (KT) during the study period. One hundred and twenty-six had undergone renal biopsy for RAD. The acute asymptomatic rise of serum creatinine was the most common clinical presentation (47.61%) followed by chronic RAD (CRAD) (19.84%), proteinuria (15.87%), immediate graft dysfunction (10.31%), and persistent active urinary sediments (6.34%) in that order. The incidence of delayed graft function was 1.98%. The overall incidence of biopsy-proven rejection was 8.41% within oneyear and 8.91% beyond oneyear of transplant. Acute cellular rejection (ACR) [with or without antibody-mediated rejection (AMR)] was found in 65%; AMR was found in 40% and 15% had both ACR and AMR. Borderline acute cell-mediated rejection was found in 22.5% of biopsies. CRAD was due to chronic rejection and chronic calcineurin inhibitor toxicity in only about one-fourth of the cases. Incidence of glomerulo-nephritis was 10.89% and most of these occurred two years after KT. Renal allograft biopsy was associated with minor complications in 3.17% of cases. Clinical presentations do not reliably distinguish the various causes of RAD. Allograft biopsy is a mainstay in the diagnosis of RAD and is safe. Results of live donor first transplantation using complement-dependent cytotoxi-city crossmatch are comparable to those programs using newer methods like solid-phase assays. However, the direct comparison of these results with other studies may not be completely applicable.

Post renal transplant pure red cell aplasia-is tacrolimus a culprit?

Anemia is not uncommon in the post-renal transplant period and has been reported in up to 40% of renal transplant recipients. It is commonly due to drugs and infections. While post-transplantation anemia is usually due to graft dysfunction and drugs such as mycophenolate and cotrimoxazole, tacrolimus is an uncommon cause. Tacrolimus is usually not believed to be significantly myelosuppressive, but it can cause anemia due to thrombotic microangiopathy. A literature review shows a very small number of reported cases of pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) where tacrolimus seemed to be a causative agent. We report a case series of three renal transplant recipients who were on tacrolimus and presented with chronic transfusion requiring anemia due to PRCA.