[Analysis of a case series of adult patients with severe atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab in Argentina]. / Análisis de una serie de casos de pacientes adultos con dermatitis atópica severa tratados con dupilumab en Argentina.

Introduction: Severe atopic dermatitis (AD) treatment is an unmet need, given the limited efficacy and safety of classical systemic treatments (CSTs). Dupilumab is a monoclonal antibody that blocks the signaling of the interleukins that mediate the inflammatory response involved in AD. Methods: the clinical response of a group of patients from Argentina with severe AD and insufficient response and/or toxicity to CSTs who were treated with dupilumab before commercial availability was analyzed. EASI, SCORAD, DLQI scales and analog visual scales of pruritus and sleep were evaluated, during a median follow-up of 189 days. In addition, the incidence of adverse events was analyzed. Results: 20 patients (13 male) were included; median age: 37.5 years; median AD evolution: 20 years; atopic comorbidity: 70%. 100% had received systemic corticosteroids (serious complications: 20%). Main reasons for discontinuation of CSTs were lack of efficacy and occurrence of adverse events. All scores were significantly and steadily reduced, with identifiable clinical response at the second month of treatment. At the end of the follow-up, only 3 patients required concomitant systemic immunosuppressive treatment. Dupilumab was well tolerated, with mild and controllable adverse events. Discussion: Dupilumab is the only biological agent with high efficacy demonstrated in clinical and observational studies. In this case series, its effectiveness was confirmed in difficult-to-treat patients with severe AD and inadequate response to CSTs. The safety profile was favorable and consistent.

Introducción: El tratamiento de la dermatitis atópica (DA) severa es una necesidad insatisfecha, dada la limitada eficacia y seguridad de los tratamientos sistémicos clásicos (TSC). Dupilumab es un anticuerpo monoclonal que bloquea la señalización de las interleuquinas mediadoras de la respuesta inflamatoria involucrada en la DA. Métodos: se analizó la respuesta clínica de un grupo de pacientes de Argentina con DA severa y respuesta insuficiente y/o toxicidad a los TSC que fueron tratados con dupilumab antes de su disponibilidad comercial. Se evaluaron las escalas EASI, SCORAD, DLQI y escalas visuales analógicas de prurito y sueño, durante una mediana de 189 días de seguimiento, así como la incidencia de eventos adversos. Resultados: Se incluyeron 20 pacientes (13 varones); mediana de edad: 37,5 años; mediana de evolución de la DA: 20 años; comorbilidad atópica: 70%. El 100% habían recibido corticoides sistémicos (complicaciones graves: 20%). Los principales motivos de suspensión de los TSC fueron falta de eficacia y aparición de eventos adversos. Los puntajes de todas las escalas se redujeron significativa y sostenidamente, con respuesta clínica evidente al segundo mes de tratamiento. Al final del seguimiento, solo 3 pacientes requerían tratamiento inmunosupresor sistémico concomitante. Dupilumab fue bien tolerado, con eventos adversos leves y controlables. Dsicusión: el dupilumab constituye el único agente biológico con elevada eficacia demostrada en estudios clínicos y observacionales. En esta casuística, se confirmó su efectividad en pacientes con DA severa de difícil tratamiento y respuesta inadecuada a los TSC. El perfil de seguridad resultó favorable y sostenido a mediano plazo.

Community study of fixed-combination adapalene 0.1% and benzoyl peroxide 2.5% in acne.

A new fixed-dose combination formulation of adapalene 0.1% and benzoyl peroxide (BPO) 2.5% has shown excellent efficacy and safety in registration studies; however, it can be difficult to judge the real-world performance of a product using only the results from controlled clinical trials. This 12-week, open-label, community-based study evaluated adapalene/BPO in 91 patients with mild to moderate acne (20-50 inflammatory lesions and 30-100 noninflammatory lesions) who were treated at dermatology centers throughout Argentina. The study evaluated efficacy, described the most common side effects, determined tolerability, and assessed the level of patient satisfaction with treatment. By week 12, there were statistically significant reductions in both inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions (80.6% and 69.3% from baseline, respectively; P < .001); there were also significant improvements in the Investigator's Global Assessment scores (median score, 2.9 at baseline and 1.0 at week 12; P < .001). By week 12, 67% of patients were rated clear or almost clear by investigators. Local tolerability was good overall. When cutaneous irritation was present, it typically occurred in the first 2 weeks of treatment and improved or resolved with continuing therapy. Patients were highly satisfied with the results of treatment, and 74% of patients felt that they had marked or total improvement by week 12. Patient survey also revealed that 94% rated the efficacy as good or very good and 87.5% rated tolerability as good or very good. A significant majority (81%) felt that the treatment met expectations, and 62% perceived that improvement had been rapid during adapalene/BPO therapy. These results demonstrate that adapalene/BPO has good efficacy and tolerability in routine practice, resulting in continuous reductions in lesion counts throughout the study. Adapalene/BPO therapy is also associated with high patient satisfaction, which is important for therapeutic adherence and satisfaction with the physician's care.