Suitability of multifunction devices Myah and Myopia Master for monitoring myopia progression in children and adults.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of using multifunction instruments to measure axial length for monitoring myopia progression in children and adults. METHODS: Axial length was measured in 60 children (aged 6-18 years) and 60 adults (aged 19-50 years) with multifunction instruments (Myah and Myopia Master) and stand-alone biometers (Lenstar LS900 and IOLMaster 700). Repeatability (measurements by the same examiner) and reproducibility (measurements by different examiners) were computed as the within-subject standard deviation (Sw) and 95% limits of agreement (LoA). Inter-instrument agreement was computed as intraclass correlation coefficients. The threshold for detecting myopic progression was taken as 0.1 mm. Measures were repeated only in children following the administration of 1% tropicamide to determine the impact of cycloplegia on axial length. RESULTS: Overall, the IOLMaster 700 had the best repeatability in children (0.014 mm) and adults (0.009 mm). Repeatability Sw values for all devices ranged from 0.005 to 0.021 mm (children) and 0.003 to 0.016 mm (adults). In children, reproducibility fell within 0.1 mm 95% of the time for the Myah, Myopia Master and IOLMaster 700. Agreement among all devices was classified as excellent (ICC 0.999; 95% CI 0.998-0.999), but the 95% LoA among the Myah, Myopia Master and Lenstar LS900 was ≥0.1 mm. Cycloplegia had no statistically significant effect on axial length (all p > 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: The Myah and Myopia Master multifunction instruments demonstrated good repeatability and reproducibility, and their accuracy was comparable to stand-alone biometers. Axial length measurements using different instruments can be considered interchangeable but should be compared with some caution. Accurate axial length measurements can be obtained without cycloplegia. The multifunction instruments Myah and Myopia Master are as well suited for monitoring myopia progression in children as the stand-alone biometers IOLMaster 700 and Lenstar LS900.

Trust and Access: Eye Information-seeking Practices and Preferences among Canadians.

SIGNIFICANCE: This study highlights the value that the public places on obtaining trusted and accessible health-related information and their preference for obtaining it from their health care practitioners. Previous research has not been specific to Canadians or vision. Findings can be used to increase eye health literacy and eye care utilization. PURPOSE: Canadians underuse eye care and underestimate the occurrence of asymptomatic eye disease. This study explored eye information-seeking practices and preferences among a group of Canadians. METHODS: Using snowball sampling, a 28-item online survey collected respondent perceptions about their eye and health information-seeking practices and preferences. Questions examined electronic device access, information source use, and demographics. Two open-ended questions examined information-seeking practices and preferences. Respondents were at least 18 years old and living in Canada. Individuals working in eye care were excluded. Response frequencies and z scores were computed. Written comments were assessed using content analysis. RESULTS: Respondents searched for less eye than health information ( z scores ≥ 2.25, P < .05). For eye and health information, primary care providers were the used and preferred source, and reliance on Internet searches was greater than desired. Trust and access drove information-seeking practices. Respondent comments suggested that a hierarchy of trust operates across My Health Team, My Network, and My External Sources, with a persistent threat posed by Discredited Sources. Access to information sources seemed mediated by enablers (Convenience and Accessible Features) and barriers (Unreachable Health Team and Absent Systems). Eye information was seen as more specialized and harder to find. There was a high regard for health care practitioners who provide their patients with curated trusted information. CONCLUSIONS: These Canadians value trusted and accessible health-related information. They prefer eye and health information from their health care practitioners and value when their health team provides online curated information, particularly regarding eyes.

Socioeconomic status and utilization of amblyopia services at a tertiary pediatric hospital in Canada.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether socioeconomic status is associated with equal utilization of amblyopia services at The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), a pediatric tertiary hospital in Canada. DESIGN: This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: The medical records of children aged under 7 years diagnosed with amblyopia at SickKids from 2007 to 2009 were reviewed. METHODS: Socioeconomic status was derived from patients' residential postal codes through linking with income data in the 2006 Canadian census report. Patients were divided into 5 income quintiles to compare with amblyopia service utilization. The main outcome measure was the observed distribution of amblyopia patients by socioeconomic status versus the expected distribution of 20% for each quintile. RESULTS: The analyses included 336 patients. Children with amblyopia at SickKids were more likely to come from the richest neighbourhood (32.5%), whereas children from each of the 3 lowest quintiles (14.6%-15.5%) were less likely to present at SickKids. These results differed significantly from the expected 20% for each quintile (p < 0.0001). All types of amblyopia were significantly under-represented for children from the lower socioeconomic groups. When analyses were stratified by travel distance to the hospital, a significant inequality between the lower and higher income quintiles remained for nonmetropolitan Toronto patients, but not for metropolitan Toronto patients. CONCLUSION: Despite a publicly funded health-care system in Canada, children from lower socioeconomic neighbourhoods in distant areas utilize the amblyopia services in a tertiary pediatric centre less often than those from higher socioeconomic status.

Clinical translation of recommendations from randomized clinical trials on patching regimen for amblyopia.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the evidence-based recommendations by the Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group (PEDIG) as initial treatment of amblyopia have been implemented into clinical practice and to discuss the necessary steps in translating evidence-based knowledge to inform clinical decision making. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Children with amblyopia seen from 2007 through 2009 by academic and community ophthalmologists in a large urban center in North America that serves a population of more than 8 million. Using PEDIG criteria, moderate amblyopia was defined as visual acuity between 20/40 and 20/80 and severe amblyopia was defined as visual acuity between 20/100 and 20/400. INTERVENTION: Patching of the sound eye. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of prescribed patching hours daily and the amblyopic eye visual acuity expressed as logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). RESULTS: For moderate amblyopia, the cohort (n = 71) was prescribed a mean of 3.2 hours of daily patching (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.8-3.6 hours), which is significantly greater than the recommended 2 hours of daily patching for initial treatment. Only 24% (95% CI, 16%-35%) of them were prescribed the recommended initial patching hours. The amblyopic eye acuity on the 3- to 6-month visit in the cohort (0.23 logMAR) was similar to that of the 4-month visit in the PEDIG cohort (0.24 logMAR; P = 0.74). For severe amblyopia, the cohort (n = 52) was prescribed a mean of 3.9 hours of daily patching (95% CI, 3.5-4.3 hours), which is significantly lower than the recommended 6 hours of daily patching for initial treatment. Only 12% (95% CI, 5%-23%) of them were prescribed the recommended initial patching hours. The amblyopic eye acuity at the 7- to 12-month visit in the cohort (0.44 logMAR) was comparable with that of the 4-month visit in the PEDIG cohort (0.40 logMAR; P = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS: The evidence-based recommendations for amblyopia management have not been translated widely into changes in clinical practice in a large urban center in North America, although there is a general move from full-time to part-time patching since the PEDIG results were published. Using a well-established framework for knowledge translation, the Knowledge-to-Action Cycle, the necessary steps required to implement new knowledge into actual clinical practice are discussed.