Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 18(1): 26-31, 2003 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12519220

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The stool antigen test, the HpSA test, has been validated mainly in Western countries, but not properly in the Chinese population. Recently, another stool antigen test, the Apollo test, was developed, but its accuracy has rarely been validated. The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of these two tests in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in the Chinese population. METHODS: Consecutive dyspeptic patients referred for upper endoscopy were recruited. During endoscopy, biopsies were taken for the rapid urease test and histological examination as the gold standard. Stool specimens were collected and used for the HpSA and Apollo tests. RESULTS: Overall, 86 patients (39 males and 47 females, with a mean age of 55.8 years) were recruited. Helicobacter pylori infection was present in 44 (51%) patients as determined by the gold standard. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 86.4, 100, and 93.0%, respectively, for the HpSA, and 90.9, 97.6, and 94.2%, respectively, for the Apollo test when cases with equivocal results were considered as positive. In addition, agreement was achieved in 81 (94.2%) cases between the two tests, with a Kappa value of 0.887. CONCLUSION: Both the HpSA and Apollo tests achieve acceptable sensitivity and excellent specificity, with accuracies of over 90% for the detection of H. pylori infection in the Chinese population.


Assuntos
Antígenos de Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Povo Asiático , Fezes/microbiologia , Infecções por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Infecções por Helicobacter/etnologia , Helicobacter pylori/imunologia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
3.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 17(8): 834-8, 2002 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12164957

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Conventional [13C]-urea breath test ([13C]-UBT) requires prior fasting and a test meal, which theoretically improves the accuracy of the test. However, recent studies have suggested that prior fasting and test meal may not be essential. We aimed to determine the accuracy of a new [13C]-UBT protocol without fasting in Chinese. METHODS: Dyspeptic patients referred for upper endoscopy were recruited. The gold standard for Helicobacter pylori infection was the combination of Campylobacter-like organism (CLO) test and histology. Group I (n = 213) patients underwent [13C]-UBT with prior fasting and with citrate acid test meal. Group II (n = 123) patients underwent [13C]-UBT without prior fasting but with test meal. Group III (n = 90) patients underwent [13C]-UBT without prior fasting and without test meal. RESULTS: The highest accuracy for groups I, II and III was 96.7, 95.1 and 95.5% using a cut-off value of 5.0, 5.5 and 3.5, respectively. The sensitivities and specificities were 97.4 and 95.8% in group I, 93.3 and 96.8% in group II, and 96.5 and 93.9% in group III, respectively. CONCLUSION: The [13C]-UBT protocols without prior fasting and either with or without test meal produce highly accurate and reliable results in the Chinese population.


Assuntos
Testes Respiratórios , Isótopos de Carbono/análise , Ingestão de Alimentos , Jejum , Infecções por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Helicobacter pylori/isolamento & purificação , Ureia/análise , Adulto , Idoso , China , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...