Australian Infant Food Allergy Emergency Presentations Following Updated Early Food Introduction Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: The Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy food allergy prevention guidelines were updated in 2016 to recommend home introduction of allergenic foods actively in the first year of life, including to infants at high risk of allergy. An important consideration for parents and providers is whether this practice increases food allergy reactions or anaphylaxis. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine whether the 2016 update of food allergy prevention guidelines was associated with an increase in food allergy or anaphylaxis emergency department (ED) presentations. METHODS: We obtained hospital electronic medical records for infants aged 4 to 12 months who attended the Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne ED in 2015 or in 2018 with a presenting problem or an encounter diagnosis of food allergy or anaphylaxis. RESULTS: Emergency department presentations owing to food allergy increased from 1.0% (95% CI, 0.85-1.23) in 2015 to 1.4% (95% CI, 1.22-1.67) in 2018 (P = .006). There was no increase in the number of anaphylaxis presentations (28 in 2015 and 22 in 2018) or peanut anaphylaxis presentations (three in 2015 and three in 2018). Overall, the proportion of food allergy presentations attributed to IgE-mediated food allergy was similar (82.1% in 2015 and 84.1% in 2018), whereas peanut allergy presentations increased slightly, although not statically significantly, from 14.6% to 21.2% (P = .09). Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome ED presentations were five in 2015 (4.3%) and 12 in 2018(7.6%), although not statistically significant (P = .25). CONCLUSIONS: Changes to food allergy prevention guidelines recommending the earlier introduction of allergenic food may have led to a small increase in ED presentations for food allergy but not anaphylaxis.

Chinese translation of strengths and difficulties questionnaire requires urgent review before field trials for validity and reliability.

UNLABELLED: Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a brief behavioural screening questionnaire for children and teenagers aged 3 to 16 years. It is available in 66 languages, and gaining more popularity world wide. Chinese translation of SDQ is available and has been used in clinical practice and research. We undertook the exercise to back-translate the current Chinese translation and it showed a number of differences compared to the original English SDQ. The differences and concerns include: (1) the flow and grammar of Chinese translation as well as wrongly written Chinese characters; (2) translated words that have deviated from the original meaning; (3) significant numbers of wording that are somewhat different from the original English version; (4) addition of auxiliary verbs that do not exist in original English version; and (5) the current Chinese SDQ is a general questionnaire for all age groups that does not observe the differences of wording that exist in the English versions. CONCLUSION: An accurate translated Chinese version is important for researchers, clinicians and educators who work in the Chinese communities. There is an urgent need to review the translation of the Chinese SDQ version before more studies use it in the field.