Expression of the lysosomal-associated membrane protein-1 (LAMP-1) in astrocytomas.

Targeting of lysosomes is a novel therapeutic anti-cancer strategy for killing the otherwise apoptosis-resistant cancer cells. Such strategies are urgently needed for treatment of brain tumors, especially the glioblastoma, which is the most frequent and most malignant type. The aim of the present study was to investigate the presence of lysosomes in astrocytic brain tumors focussing also on the therapy resistant tumor stem cells. Expression of the lysosomal marker LAMP-1 (lysosomal-associated membrane protein-1) was investigated by immunohistochemistry in 112 formalin fixed paraffin embedded astrocytomas and compared with tumor grade and overall patient survival. Moreover, double immunofluorescence stainings were performed with LAMP-1 and the astrocytic marker GFAP and the putative stem cell marker CD133 on ten glioblastomas. Most tumors expressed the LAMP-1 protein in the cytoplasm of the tumor cells, while the blood vessels were positive in all tumors. The percentage of LAMP-1 positive tumor cells and staining intensities increased with tumor grade but variations in tumors of the same grade were also found. No association was found between LAMP-1 expression and patient overall survival in the individual tumor grades. LAMP-1/GFAP showed pronounced co-expression and LAMP-1/CD133 was co-expressed as well suggesting that tumor cells including the proposed tumor stem cells contain lysosomes. The results suggest that high amounts of lysosomes are present in glioblastomas and in the proposed tumor stem cells. Targeting of lysosomes may be a promising novel therapeutic strategy against this highly malignant neoplasm.

Inconsistent immunohistochemical expression patterns of four different CD133 antibody clones in glioblastoma.

The putative tumor stem cell marker CD133 is the marker of choice for identifying brain tumor stem cells in gliomas, but the use of different CD133 antibody clones possibly recognizing different CD133 splice variants with epitopes of different glycosylation status confuses the field. The aim was to investigate if current inconsistent CD133 observations could be a result of using different CD133 antibodies for immunohistochemical identification of CD133. Ten glioblastomas were immunohistochemically stained with four different CD133 antibody clones (AC133, W6B3C1, C24B9, and ab19898) and analyzed by quantitative stereology. Moreover, the CD133 staining pattern of each antibody clone was investigated in kidney, pancreas, and placenta tissue as well as in glioblastoma and retinoblastoma cultures and cell lines. All antibody clones revealed CD133+ niches and single cells in glioblastomas, but when using different clones, their distribution rarely corresponded. Morphology of identified single cells varied, and staining of various tissues, cultures, and cells lines was also inconsistent among the clones. In conclusion, the authors report inconsistent CD133 detection when using different primary CD133 antibody clones. Thus, direct comparison of studies using different antibody clones and conclusions based on CD133 immunohistochemistry should be performed with caution.