Assessing the safety and efficacy of prescribing psychologists in New Mexico and Louisiana.

This study aimed to compare patient outcomes between prescribing psychologists, psychiatrists, and primary care physicians (PCPs). Private insurance claims (2005-2021; n = 307,478) were used to conduct an active comparator, new user longitudinal cohort study developed using target trial emulation. Inverse propensity for treatment weighting was used to adjust for baseline differences in a range of sociodemographic, clinical, and contextual patient factors. Differences in the 1-year rate of health care visits for adverse drug events (ADEs), psychiatric emergency department (ED) utilization, medication adherence, and psychotropic polypharmacy were identified between prescribing psychologists and the other provider types using doubly robust Cox proportional hazards models. Compared to patients of psychiatrists, patients of prescribing psychologists had a 24% lower rate of ADEs (95% CI [0.60, 0.96]), a 20% lower rate of psychotropic polypharmacy (95% CI [0.74, 0.86]), and similar rates of psychiatric ED utilization and medication nonadherence. Compared to patients of PCPs, patients of prescribing psychologists had 138% higher rates of psychiatric ED utilization (95% CI [1.67, 3.39]), 175% higher rates of psychotropic polypharmacy (95% CI [2.53, 2.99]), 28% lower rates of medication nonadherence (95% CI [0.66, 0.78]), and similar rates of ADEs. Using robust pharmacoepidemiological methods, we noted that among mental health specialists, prescribing psychologists appear to be as safe and efficacious as psychiatrists in a large sample of privately insured patients. Notable differences in safety and efficacy when compared to PCPs may be attributable to differences between specialty and primary care. Future research on prescribing psychologists should move toward studies of care quality. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Demographics and clinical characteristics of patients of prescribing psychologists, psychiatrists, and primary care physicians.

To describe the characteristics of patients receiving psychotropic medication from prescribing psychologists, psychiatrists, and primary care physicians. This descriptive study was conducted using private insurance claims of patients from New Mexico and Louisiana receiving psychotropic medications (anticonvulsants, antidepressants, antipsychotics, hypotensive agents, anxiolytics/sedatives/hypnotics, and stimulants) from 2004 to 2021 (N = 307,478). Patient characteristics were captured during the 6 months prior to their first psychotropic medication using administrative information, diagnosis and procedure codes, and medication data. Logistic regression models estimated the associations of patient characteristics with prescriber type. Additional logistic regression models estimated the association of prescriber type with medication classes prescribed. Patients were most likely to see specialists (psychologists or psychiatrists) if they had bipolar disorder (average marginal effect and 95% CI 0.214 [0.196, 0.231]), schizophrenia/psychotic disorders (0.118 [0.097, 0.138]), or had 1-4 visits of psychotherapy (0.267 [0.258, 0.026]). Specialist patients were most likely to see a prescribing psychologist if they had 1-4 visits of psychotherapy (0.196 [0.183, 0.210]) or had insomnia (0.309 [0.203, 0.415]). Prescribing psychologists were more likely to prescribe antidepressants (0.028 [0.011, 0.045]) and less likely to prescribe antipsychotics (-0.016 [-0.020, -0.012]) than psychiatrists. Primary care physicians were less likely to prescribe all psychotropic medications except antidepressants (0.011 [0.002, 0.019]) and anxiolytics (0.074 [0.067, 0.080]). Prescribing psychologists treat patients who are more similar to those of psychiatrists than patients of primary care physicians; they are less likely to prescribe antipsychotics and more likely to prescribe antidepressants. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Patterns of Mental Health Service Use During the Transition to Adulthood Among Autistic Adolescents and Young Adults.

Background: The time of transition into adulthood, especially when leaving school, is a time when many autistic adolescents and young adults (AYA) may stop receiving mental health services that they have relied on, leading to worse mental health outcomes. The purpose of this study was to describe patterns of mental health service use during transition to adulthood among autistic AYAs. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study using electronic health records from years 2015 to 2019 from one large university health care system. We included autistic individuals ages 11-27 with at least one clinical encounter annually in the cohort. Outcomes included psychotropic medications and psychotherapy received, psychotropic polypharmacy, psychiatric emergency department (ED) visits, and adverse drug events. Results: Almost half of the 529 patients in the cohort received polypharmacy. The most common treatment was medication only (56.9%), followed by no treatment (22.7%), medication plus psychotherapy (18.7%), and psychotherapy only (data masked). The 17-21 age group had the highest odds of a psychiatric ED visit, whereas the 22-27 age group had the highest odds of receiving psychotropic medications and polypharmacy. Black AYA were more likely to receive psychotherapy and less likely to receive psychotropic polypharmacy than non-Hispanic Whites. Conclusion: Autistic individuals may benefit from more support from the health care system for their transition into adulthood to maintain use of beneficial mental health services as they leave school and to reduce the frequency of adverse outcomes. Access to providers experienced treating the complex needs of autistic individuals is important to reduce disparities.

Why is this an important issue?: Autistic adolescents and young adults often do not receive the mental health care services they need. As they transition into adulthood, they may lose important mental health services they relied on during childhood. Losing services may negatively affect their health and produce bad outcomes such as emergency department visits. Previous studies have suggested that autistic individuals often stop receiving important services as they leave school and lose access to school-based services. What was the purpose of this study?: The purpose was to describe patterns of mental health service use during the transition to adulthood among autistic adolescents and young adults. Underutilized services might indicate areas where the health care system needs to improve. What did the researchers do?: We used data from electronic health records from a large university health system in the southeastern United States. We identified autistic adolescents and young adults ages 11­27 in the data. We analyzed whether they received medication and/or psychotherapy for their mental health, and whether they had emergency department visits and adverse drug events. We also examined polypharmacy, meaning the use of multiple medications of different classes for mental health. What were the results of the study?: Almost half of the 529 included patients experienced polypharmacy. The majority received medication only, whereas smaller percentages received medication plus psychotherapy or psychotherapy alone. Emergency department visits were most common in the 17­21 age group, and psychotropic medications and polypharmacy were most used in the 22­27 age group. Black individuals were more likely to receive psychotherapy and less likely to receive psychotropic polypharmacy than non-Hispanic Whites. What do these findings add to what was already known?: These findings show that providers are relying heavily on medication, often including polypharmacy, to treat mental health issues in autistic adolescents and young adults. What are potential weaknesses of the study?: The study used only one health care system in one state and may not reflect what happens in other states with different policies. Data may include a high number of patients with complex medical conditions, which may not reflect the typical patient's experience. Medications prescribed by providers outside this particular health system may not be captured. How will these findings help autistic adults now or in the future?: These findings reveal potential areas for improvement for providers and health systems in treating autistic adults. Ensuring that autistic adolescents can continue to receive important mental health services as they age into adulthood can improve their health.

Neighborhood context and children's health care utilization and health outcomes: a comprehensive descriptive analysis of national survey data.

While child health and health care disparities arising from unequal distribution of resources are well documented, a nationally representative inventory of health and well-being for children across the spectrum of opportunity is lacking. Using the nationally representative sample of children from pooled 2013-2017 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data linked to the census-tract-level Child Opportunity Index 2.0, a composite measure of neighborhood health, education, and socioeconomic conditions, we describe US children's socioeconomic characteristics, health care utilization and expenditures across the spectrum of child neighborhood opportunity levels. We found that neighborhood level of child opportunity was associated with almost all of children's health status, health care utilization, expenditures, access to care, and satisfaction with care outcomes. Children living in lower-opportunity neighborhoods had the highest rates of poor physical and mental health status and fewest ambulatory care visits but accounted for the highest share of emergency department visits. Their parents were also least likely to report having positive experiences with health care, good communication with providers, and easy access to care. Our findings underscore the myriad harms to children of gaps in health, education, and financial resources at the community level and provide targets for public investments to improve child-focused outcomes.

Automated Detection of Repetitive Motor Behaviors as an Outcome Measurement in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.

Repetitive sensory motor behaviors are a direct target for clinical treatment and a potential treatment endpoint for individuals with intellectual or developmental disabilities. By removing the burden associated with video annotation or direct observation, automated detection of stereotypy would allow for longer term monitoring in ecologic settings. We report automated detection of common stereotypical motor movements using commercially available accelerometers affixed to the body and a generalizable detection algorithm. The method achieved a sensitivity of 80% for body rocking and 93% for hand flapping without individualized algorithm training or foreknowledge of subject's specific movements. This approach is well-suited for implementation in a continuous monitoring system outside of a clinical setting.

Quality improvement, implementation, and dissemination strategies to improve mental health care for children and adolescents: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Some outcomes for children with mental health problems remain suboptimal because of poor access to care and the failure of systems and providers to adopt established quality improvement strategies and interventions with proven effectiveness. This review had three goals: (1) assess the effectiveness of quality improvement, implementation, and dissemination strategies intended to improve the mental health care of children and adolescents; (2) examine harms associated with these strategies; and (3) determine whether effectiveness or harms differ for subgroups based on system, organizational, practitioner, or patient characteristics. METHODS: Sources included MEDLINE®, the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and CINAHL, from database inception through February 17, 2017. Additional sources included gray literature, additional studies from reference lists, and technical experts. Two reviewers selected relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Dual analysis, synthesis, and grading of the strength of evidence for each outcome followed for studies meeting inclusion criteria. We also used qualitative comparative analysis to examine relationships between combinations of strategy components and improvements in outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 18 strategies described in 19 studies. Eleven strategies significantly improved at least one measure of intermediate outcomes, final health outcomes, or resource use. Moderate strength of evidence (from one RCT) supported using provider financial incentives such as pay for performance to improve the competence with which practitioners can implement evidence-based practices (EBPs). We found inconsistent evidence involving strategies with educational meetings, materials, and outreach; programs appeared to be successful in combination with reminders or providing practitioners with newly collected clinical information. We also found low strength of evidence for no benefit for initiatives that included only educational materials or meetings (or both), or only educational materials and outreach components. Evidence was insufficient to draw conclusions on harms and moderators of interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Several strategies can improve both intermediate and final health outcomes and resource use. This complex and heterogeneous body of evidence does not permit us to have a high degree of confidence about the efficacy of any one strategy because we generally found only a single study testing each strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42015024759 .

Use of antipsychotic medications in pediatric and young adult populations: future research needs.

The use of antipsychotics, particularly second generation antipsychotics, among children and adolescents has increased markedly during the past 20 years. Existing evidence gaps make this practice controversial and hinder treatment decision-making. This article describes and prioritizes future research needs regarding antipsychotic treatment in youth, focusing on within-class and between-class drug comparisons with regard to key population subgroups, efficacy and effectiveness outcomes, and adverse event outcomes. Using as a foundation a recent systematic review of antipsychotic treatment among youth, which was completed by a different Evidence-based Practice Center, we worked with a diverse group of 12 stakeholders representing researchers, funders, health care providers, patients, and families to identify and prioritize research needs. From an initial list of 16 evidence gaps, we enumerated 6 high-priority research needs: 1) long-term comparative effectiveness across all psychiatric disorders; 2) comparative long-term risks of adverse outcomes; 3) short-term risks of adverse events; 4) differentials of efficacy, effectiveness, and safety for population subgroups; 5) comparative effectiveness among those with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and disruptive behavior disorders and common comorbidities; 6) comparative effectiveness among those with bipolar disorder and common comorbidities. In this article, we describe these future research needs in detail and discuss study designs that could be used to address them.

A+KIDS, a web-based antipsychotic registry for North Carolina youths: an alternative to prior authorization.

OBJECTIVE: The rise in use of antipsychotics among U.S. children is well documented. Compliance rates with current safety-monitoring guidelines are low. In response, the North Carolina Division of Medical Assistance established the Antipsychotics-Keeping It Documented for Safety (A+KIDS) registry. The initial objectives of the project were to successfully establish a Web-based safety registry and to obtain and evaluate clinical information derived from the registry. METHODS: In April 2011, A+KIDS began asking prescribers of antipsychotics for children age 12 and under to respond to a set of questions regarding dose, indication, and usage history. Antipsychotic registrations were examined by linking North Carolina Medicaid prescription claims to registry entries. Prescribers were classified into different types, and the number of patients and registrations per prescriber were examined. RESULTS: In the initial six months, 730 prescribers registered 5,532 patients, 19% below age seven. By month 6 of the registry, 72% of all fills were registered with the program. Top diagnosis groups for registry patients were unspecified mood disorders, autism spectrum disorders, and disruptive behavior disorders. Top target symptoms were aggression (48%), irritability (19%), and impulsivity (11%). Psychosis accounted for 5% of the target symptoms. Twenty-eight percent of children were receiving no form of psychotherapy. Twenty-five percent of all A+KIDS prescribers were responsible for 81% of the registrations. CONCLUSIONS: The A+KIDS registry initiative has been successful, as measured by rapid uptake, and is providing clinical information not available from claims data alone. Future efforts will allow for detailed examinations of antipsychotic utilization and further safety improvement.