Diseased vein grafts express elevated inflammatory cytokine levels compared with atherosclerotic coronary arteries.

BACKGROUND: The pathologic modifications characterizing vein graft disease resemble those observed in native arteriosclerosis, but in accelerated form. Although both disorders are considered to be inflammatory diseases, it remains to be determined whether diseased vein grafts and atherosclerotic coronary arteries differentially express inflammatory mediators. Therefore, we examined whether differences in the expression of proinflammatory cytokines by these two distinct vascular pathologies favor the accelerated inflammation within diseased vein grafts. METHODS: The messengerRNA expression of various cytokines (interleukin-1 beta [IL-1 beta], IL-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor-alpha [TNF-alpha], interferon-gamma [IFN-gamma]) was quantified using real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in tissue samples of native saphenous veins (NSV, n = 5), diseased coronary arteries (CAD, n = 25), and diseased vein grafts (VG, n = 13). RESULTS: Native saphenous veins did not contain any detectable transcripts except for IFN-gamma. As expected, CAD was characterized by the expression of IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-8, IFN-gamma, and TNF-alpha mRNA. Interestingly VG also expressed these mediators, but at markedly higher levels. Quantification by RT-PCR revealed that, compared with specimens from the CAD group, VG specimens contained 5.8 +/- 1.2 times, 286 +/- 22 times, and 29 +/- 7.3 times as many transcripts for the cytokines IL-1 beta, IL-6 and TNF-alpha, respectively, as well as 25 +/- 8.3 times more transcripts for the chemokine IL-8. In contrast, the expression of IFN-gamma transcripts did not differ among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The elevated expression of proinflammatory cytokine transcripts supports the hypothesis that diseased vein grafts, compared with atherosclerotic coronary arteries, are characterized by enhanced inflammatory activity that might accelerate atherosclerotic modifications. This may implicate new therapeutic strategies for the prevention of vein graft disease.

Low-energy cardioversion versus medical treatment for the termination of atrial fibrillation after CABG.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent complication after cardiac surgery and can cause considerable morbidity. Low-energy cardioversion (LEC) using biatrial epicardial wires implanted during surgery has been shown to be effective and safe in conscious patients, but has not been directly compared with medical treatment so far. We therefore prospectively studied the efficacy of LEC in men 60 years of age and older. METHODS: Sixteen patients (mean +/- SD, 66.4 +/- 5.4 years) were randomized to LEC and 32 patients (66.3 +/- 5.0 years) to standarized medical treatment in the event of postoperative AF. Age, comorbidity, and surgical variables did not differ significantly between the groups. RESULTS: After cardiac surgery, AF occurred in 6 patients (38%) assigned to LEC and in 11 patients assigned to medical treatment (34%; p = NS). Low-energy cardioversion restored sinus rhythm in all but 1 patient, and 1 patient in the LEC group had early recurrence of AF. All other patients in the LEC group had prompt and stable restoration of sinus rhythm. Medical treatment was associated with the restoration of sinus rhythm in all patients. Although the total time in AF was decreased significantly by LEC (median 5 minutes versus 22 hours; p = 0.037), the length of postoperative hospitalization was not (5.1 +/- 1.4 days for the LEC group compared with 5.3 +/- 1.6 days for controls). CONCLUSIONS: Low-energy cardioversion significantly decreased the amount of time cardiac surgery patients spent in AF after the operation. Larger studies are needed to determine whether this new treatment modality has the ability to decrease morbidity associated with postoperative AF and is cost-effective.