The correlation between soluble human leukocyte antigen (sHLA-G) levels and +3010 polymorphism.

Human leukocyte antigen-G (HLA-G) is classified as non-classical HLA, located in the short arm of chromosome 6 and composed of seven introns and eight exons. The HLA-G gene has a lower frequency polymorphism in the coding area and higher variability at the regulatory 5'- and 3'-untranslated regions linked to HLA-G microRNA regulation. HLA-G molecule is known to have an immunomodulatory and tolerogenic features role. In 199 Saudi individuals, we examined the association between plasma soluble HLA-G (sHLA-G) levels and eight polymorphic different sites, including 14 bp ins/del/+3003T-C/+3010C-G/+3027C-A/+3035C-T/+3142C-G/+3187A-G/+3196C-G single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in exon 8 in the HLA-G gene. Our results revealed higher frequency for rs17179101C (97%), rs1707T (92%) and rs9380142A (73%) alleles. Greater frequencies for the tested genotypes were observed in 3027C/C (rs17179101) (93%), 14 bp (rs1704) ins/del (92%), +3003T/T (rs1707) (85%) and +3035C/T (rs17179108) (79%) SNP genotypes. Moreover, we observed a significant association of sHLA-G with +3010G/C (rs1710) SNP. In conclusion, we showed a significant association between 3010G/C (rs1710) SNP and the sHLA-G level among our sample for Saudi populations. Our findings demonstrated that specific SNP within the HLA-G gene is linked to sHLA-G molecule secretion, suggesting sHLA-G levels may be regulated genetically.

Investigating the relationship between class I HLA-specific immunoglobulin-G subclasses, Pan-IgG single antigen bead assays and complement mediated interference in sera from renal transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Antibody mediated rejection is the leading cause of kidney transplant failure. Not all antibodies are harmful and some may be protective. Immunoglulin Gs, of which there are four subtypes, are detected by single antigen bead testing. The aims of this study were to characterise the IgG subclass profiles for class I HLA-specific antibodies in an uncensored post-transplant population and to determine the underlying relationship between reactivity patterns and MFI cut-offs with the pan-IgG assay. METHODS: Patients were recruited to the study who were transplanted in our centre between 2009 and 2014. Prospectively stored post-transplant serum initially underwent a Labscreen Mixed assay and those positive for class I HLA-specific antibody underwent standard SAB testing, EDTA, 1 in 10 dilution and IgG subclass modifications using the Luminex platform. A total of 4947 bead reactions from 51 patients were analysed. RESULTS: A 1 in 10 dilution was used as a comparator pan-IgG assay for summed subclass and individual subclass linear regression analyses. Using a dilution to standard assay ratio we characterised all reactions for prozone potential i.e. how likely there is to be inhibition related to complement complex formation. We stratified samples into degrees of association and were able to determine suggested MFI thresholds of Log 5.35 for the dilution assay and Log 5.05 for the summed subclass assay when considering a Log MFI of 6.9 (1000) in the standard assay. Using individual subclass dominant reactions (>70%) we were able to determine linear relationships between the 1 in 10 dilution pan-IgG assay and the individual subclass assays (excluding prozone potential reactions for IgG1/3) enabling us to suggest Log MFI thresholds of 5.03, 3.58, 4.3 and 4.05 respectively for IgG1-4. DISCUSSION: We recommend a 1 in 10 dilution as the optimum pan-IgG comparator assay for a subclass analysis. We advocate the utilisation of the summed subclass assay to determine overall relationships and potential subclass failures. Following others, we recommend serum pre-treatment of the subclass assays to mitigate prozone. We suggest cut-offs for each IgG subclass which should be used with caution given the many inhibitory influences which may include competitive inhibition for bead binding, IgM and IgA interference and under-representation of specific subclasses on the bead panel.

Investigating complement mediated interference in class I HLA-specific antibodies following renal transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Single antigen bead testing (SAB) for HLA-specific antibody enables efficient organ allocation and aids in the diagnosis of antibody mediated rejection. In this retrospective cohort study, a population of kidney transplant recipients possessing HLA Class I antibodies was used to evaluate the best method for resolving complement interference, the so called "prozone" effect. The aim was to compare the use of EDTA versus a Biotin-Streptavidin Complex as methodological approaches for abating the prozone effect using a fixed 1 in 10 dilution as validation. METHODS: One hundred and seventeen patients transplanted in our centre between 2009 and 2014 were identified as having class I HLA-specific antibody(-ies) using a Labscreen® Mixed assay. Positive sera underwent class I HLA-specific SAB testing; for comparison a standard SAB with and without EDTA, BSC and dilution (1 in 10) modifications were utilised. Samples were processed on the Luminex platform generating 11,349 bead reactions for analysis. RESULTS: We identified sera from 23 patients giving rise to 170 bead reactions showing complement interference. Using linear modelling, we observed slightly higher MFIs on average in both EDTA and BSC modifications when compared to the standard assay, allowing the nominal threshold MFI of 2000 in the standard assay to be adjusted to 2097 and 2033 in the EDTA and BSC assays respectively. We calculated 99% prediction intervals to establish outlier bead reactions for each assay. The 1 in 10 dilution was used as a crosscheck for determining which prozone reactions were overcome by EDTA and BSC. Using ROC curve analysis, EDTA was found to be ~90% sensitive and 100% specific compared to BSC which was ~60% sensitive and 100% specific in ameliorating prozone positive reactions at the thresholds defined by linear models. DISCUSSION: Our data indicates that both EDTA and BSC are suitable assays in overcoming CMI. We recommend that all clinical laboratories adopt a validated assay designed specifically to abrogate CMI for all potential renal transplant recipients, as the standard assay is inhibited in nearly 20% of a post-transplant cohort.

Oxidative stress in kidney transplant biopsies.

OBJECTIVES: Kidney allograft biopsies are performed after kidney transplant to determine graft dysfunction. We aimed to define and measure the oxidative stress occurring in these biopsies and compared these biopsies with donor pretransplant biopsies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The biopsy procedure was done according to the unit protocol. A core of tissue was taken for research purposes only when it was safe enough to proceed for an extra core. Common indications for biopsy were acute or chronic graft dysfunction, delayed graft function, acute cellular rejection, and calcineurin toxicity. There were 17 pretransplant biopsies taken from deceased-donor kidneys. Biopsy specimens were snap frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen and stored at -70 °C. Samples were processed for Western blot and tested for markers of oxidative stress. RESULTS: There were 61 biopsies analyzed. Oxidative stress enzymes were evaluated by Western blot including catalase, manganese superoxide dismutase, copper zinc superoxide dismutase, thioredoxin reductase, and thioredoxin. Upregulation of most antioxidant enzymes was observed in pretransplant biopsies. Increased expression of manganese superoxide dismutase was observed in donor kidneys and kidneys with acute cellular rejection and calcineurin toxicity. Copper zinc superoxide dismutase and catalase were elevated in donor and acute cellular rejection biopsies. Thioredoxin was elevated in donor biopsies and thioredoxin reductases were elevated in donor biopsies and biopsies with acute cellular rejection and calcineurin toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The kidney allograft biopsies showed that oxidative stress levels were elevated during allograft dysfunction in all biopsies regardless of diagnosis, but not significantly. The levels also were elevated in pretransplant biopsies. The study showed that oxidative stress is involved in various acute injuries occurring within the allograft.

Randomised placebo-controlled trial of rituximab (anti-CD20) in active ulcerative colitis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of the B lymphocyte (anti-CD20) antibody, rituximab, in the treatment of steroid-resistant moderately active ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: A double-blinded, randomised controlled trial with a 2:1 ratio of treatment:placebo (phase II) was carried out in the setting of a University teaching hospital. The subjects comprised 24 patients with moderately active UC who have either failed to respond to conventional corticosteroid therapy or who have relapsed during corticosteroid withdrawal. Five of 8 placebo-treated patients and 12 of 16 rituximab-treated patients were receiving azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine or methotrexate. Two infusions of rituximab 1 g in 500 ml of 0.9% saline intravenously over 4 h (n=16) or saline placebo (n=8) were given at 0 and 2 weeks. Patients still receiving corticosteroids on entry (placebo group 7/8; rituximab group 14/16) continued a standard steroid tapering regimen. The primary end point was remission (Mayo score ≤ 2) at 4 weeks. Secondary end points included response (Mayo score reduced ≥ 3) at 4 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Mayo score at entry was higher in rituximab-treated patients (mean 9.19; 95% CI 8.31 to 10.06) than for placebo patients (7.63; 6.63 to 8.62, p=0.03). At week 4 only 1/8 placebo-treated patients and 3/16 rituximab-treated patients were in remission (p=1.0), but 8/16 rituximab-treated patients had responded compared with 2/8 placebo-treated patients, with a median reduction in Mayo score of 2.5 (rituximab) compared with 0 (placebo; p=0.07). This response was only maintained to week 12 in 4/16. Mucosal healing was seen at week 4 in 5/16 rituximab-treated patients and 2/8 placebo-treated patients (non-significant). Rituximab was well tolerated, with one chest infection, three mild infusion reactions plus one case of (probably unrelated) non-fatal pulmonary embolism. CONCLUSIONS Rituximab has no significant effect on inducing remission in moderately active UC not responding to oral steroids. There was a possible short-term response that was not sustained. Rituximab is well tolerated in UC. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT00261118.