Effects of an outpatient intervention comprising nurse-led non-invasive assessments, telemedicine support and remote cardiologists' decisions in patients with heart failure (AMULET study): a randomised controlled trial.

AIM: Prevention of heart failure (HF) hospitalisations and deaths constitutes a major therapeutic aim in patients with HF. The role of telemedicine in this context remains equivocal. We investigated whether an outpatient telecare based on nurse-led non-invasive assessments supporting remote therapeutic decisions (AMULET telecare) could improve clinical outcomes in patients after an episode of acute HF during 12-month follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prospective randomised controlled trial, patients with HF and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤49%, after an episode of acute HF within the last 6 months, were randomly assigned to receive either an outpatient telecare based on nurse-led non-invasive assessments (n = 300) (AMULET model) or standard care (n = 305). The primary composite outcome of unplanned HF hospitalisation or cardiovascular death occurred in 51 (17.1%) patients in the telecare group and 73 (23.9%) patients in the standard care group up to 12 months after randomization [hazard ratio (HR) 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-0.99; P = 0.044]. The implementation of AMULET telecare, as compared to standard care, reduced the risk of first unplanned HF hospitalisation (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.42-0.91; P = 0.015) as well as the risk of total unplanned HF hospitalisations (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.41-0.99; P = 0.044).There was no difference in cardiovascular mortality between the study groups (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.54-1.67; P = 0.930). CONCLUSIONS: AMULET telecare as compared to standard care significantly reduced the risk of HF hospitalisation or cardiovascular death during 12-month follow-up among patients with HF and LVEF ≤49% after an episode of acute HF.

Rationale and design of the AMULET study: A new Model of telemedical care in patients with heart failure.

AIMS: Heart failure (HF) is characterized by high mortality and hospital readmission rates. Limited access to cardiologists restricts the application of guideline-directed, patient-tailored medical therapy. Some telemedicine solutions and novel non-invasive diagnostic tools may facilitate real-time detection of early HF decompensation symptoms, prompt initiation of appropriate treatment, and optimal management of medical resources. We describe the rationale and design of the AMULET trial, which investigates the effect of comprehensive outpatient intervention, based on individualized haemodynamic assessment and teleconsultations, on cardiovascular mortality and unplanned hospitalizations in HF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The AMULET trial is a multicentre, prospective, randomized, open-label, and controlled parallel group trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03476590). Six hundred and five eligible patients with HF (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤49%, at least one hospitalization due to acute HF decompensation within 6 months prior to enrolment) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either an intervention group or a standard care group. The planned follow-up is 12 months. The AMULET interventions are performed in ambulatory care points operated by nurses, with the remote support of cardiologists. The comprehensive clinical evaluation comprises measurements of heart rate, blood pressure, body mass, thoracic fluid content, and total body water. A recommendation support module based on these objective parameters is implemented in remote therapeutic decision-making. The primary complex endpoints are cardiovascular mortality and unplanned HF hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: The AMULET trial will provide a prospective assessment of the effect of comprehensive ambulatory intervention, based on telemedicine and haemodynamically guided therapy, on mortality and readmissions in HF patients.

Nurse-led ambulatory care supported by non-invasive haemodynamic assessment after acute heart failure decompensation.

Heart failure (HF) is characterized by frequent decompensation and an unpredictable trajectory. To prevent early hospital readmission, coordinated discharge planning and individual therapeutic approach are recommended. AIMS: We aimed to assess the effect of 1 month of ambulatory care, led by nurses and supported by non-invasive haemodynamic assessment, on the functional status, well-being, and haemodynamic status of patients post-acute HF decompensation. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study had a multicentre, prospective, and observational design and included patients with at least one hospitalization due to acute HF decompensation within 6 months prior to enrolment. The 1 month ambulatory care included three visits led by a nurse when the haemodynamic state of each patient was assessed non-invasively by impedance cardiography, including thoracic fluid content assessment. The pharmacotherapy was modified basing on haemodynamic assessment. Sixty eight of 73 recruited patients (median age = 67 years; median left ventricular ejection fraction = 30%) finished 1 month follow-up. A significant improvement was observed in both the patients' functional status as defined by New York Heart Association class (P = 0.013) and sense of well-being as evaluated by a visual analogue score (P = 0.002). The detailed patients' assessment on subsequent visits resulted in changes of pharmacotherapy in a significant percentage of patients (Visit 2 = 39% and Visit 3 = 44%). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed model of nurse-led ambulatory care for patients after acute HF decompensation, with consequent assessment of the haemodynamic profile, resulted in: (i) improvement in the functional status, (ii) improvement in the well-being, and (iii) high rate of pharmacotherapy modifications.

Real-world Experience of Cabozantinib as Second- or Subsequent Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Data From the Polish Managed Access Program.

BACKGROUND: Cabozantinib is an approved treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). This report presents an analysis of the safety profile and efficacy of cabozantinib in an unselected population from Poland. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with mRCC, who had been treated with at least 1 previous agent targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway, were eligible to receive cabozantinib at a once-daily dose of 60 mg orally, according to the Managed Access Program (MAP). Data were collected in 4 Polish centers. Patients who had received ≥ 1 dose of cabozantinib were monitored for adverse events (AEs) using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.4.0. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients were enrolled between October 2016 and March 2018, including 50% with bone metastases, 10% with brain metastases and 4.3% with non-clear-cell RCC; 76% had received ≥ 2 lines of therapy. The median time of follow-up was 12.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.5-14.1 months). The most common grade 3 and 4 AEs were fatigue (23%), hand-foot syndrome (12%), and diarrhea (10%). Only 4% of patients discontinued treatment owing to AEs, and there were no treatment-related deaths. Partial response was observed in 19% of patients, whereas 56% had stable disease. The median progression-free survival was 12.5 months (95% CI, 9.2-14.2 months), with a 12-month overall survival rate of 70.4% (95% CI, 60.2%-78.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Cabozantinib demonstrated acceptable tolerability and activity in a large unselected population of patients with mRCC under clinical conditions.

External validation of the systemic immune-inflammation index as a prognostic factor in metastatic renal cell carcinoma and its implementation within the international metastatic renal cell carcinoma database consortium model.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a study to validate the influence of the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) on overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and to verify whether the implementation of the SII in place of neutrophil and platelet counts within the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Consortium (IMDC) model might increase its prognostic accuracy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with mRCC, who were treated with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors from 2008 to 2016 in two major oncology centres in Poland. We stratified patients into low SII (< 730) and high SII (≥ 730) groups according to a recent literature report. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regressions (CPHRs) to assess the impact of the SII on OS and concordance, global 'goodness-of-fit', calibration and reclassification measures to quantify a potential prognostic benefit from the modification of the IMDC model. RESULTS: Overall, 502 patients (294 with low and 208 with high SII) were included. Median OS was 36.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 30.4-41.5 months] and 17.0 months (95% CI 12.5-19.6 months) in the low and high SII groups, respectively. The SII status was significant in CPHRs with the hazard ratio ranging from 1.38 to 1.68. All prognostic accuracy measures favored the SII-modified-IMDC model over the original IMDC model. CONCLUSIONS: Using an external dataset, we showed that high SII was an independent factor for poor OS. The addition of the SII to the IMDC model in place of neutrophil and platelet counts increased the model's prognostic performance.

Biomarkers defining probability of receiving second-line targeted therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

In order to facilitate long-term treatment decisions, we aimed to define biomarkers defining the probability of receiving second-line (SL) targeted therapy (TT) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) based on their characteristics present at first-line TT initiation. We analysed 152 consecutive mRCC patients treated and used multivariable binominal logistic regression to identify factors contributing to the probability of receiving SL TT. Final model was assessed with bias-corrected indices (Nagelkerke's R2 and area under receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]) and two bootstrap procedures were used for internal validation. Factors associated with the probability of SL TT eligibility were the presence of brain metastases (odds ratio [OR] 0.084, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.010-0.707), number of metastatic sites (OR 0.740, 95% CI 0.575-0.953 per each site), platelet count (OR 0.971, 95% CI 0.947-0.997, per 104/ml), lactate dehydrogenase level (OR 0.952, 95% CI 0.910-0.997 per 10 units/l), and albumin concentration (OR 1.924, 95% CI 1.057-3.503 per 1 g/dl). We developed on-line calculator that enables practicing clinicians to estimate SL treatment probability ( http://www.r-calc.com ).

Role of WNT/ß-Catenin Pathway as Potential Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Renal Cell Cancer Patients Treated With Everolimus in the Second and Subsequent Lines.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to search for predictive and prognostic factors in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with everolimus among the components of the WNT/ß-catenin pathway. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective, single-arm, phase II study, patients with mRCC received everolimus (10 mg/d) in a 30-day cycle. We performed a prospectively planned evaluation of the potential biomarkers of the WNT/ß-catenin pathway. RESULTS: The serum level of soluble E-cadherin (sE-cadherin) in patients with RCC was significantly greater than that in the controls (71.62 ± 22.28 pg/mL vs. 54.26 ± 10.317 pg/mL; P = .0069). After 2 cycles of everolimus therapy, we observed a significance increase in sE-cadherin (from 71.81 ± 21.18 pg/mL to 77.50 ± 28.212 pg/mL; P = .0151). The Dickkopf-1 protein levels in the study and control groups were not significantly different (P = .2135). The favorable independent predictors for everolimus therapy were normal lactate dehydrogenase level before treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.98; P = .0443) and low sE-cadherin level (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.29-0.98; P = .0422). On multivariate analysis, we observed that worse overall survival was seen in patients with a lower regression coefficient of sE-cadherin after 2 cycles of treatment (HR, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.23-5.52; P = .0128), an increased corrected calcium level (HR, 3.09; 95% CI, 1.21-7.88; P = .0180), and an increased lactate dehydrogenase level before treatment (HR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.02-3.83; P = .0426). CONCLUSION: WNT/ß-catenin component expression in patients with mRCC had no effect on progression-free survival or overall survival. However, we found that the sE-cadherin level might interact with response to everolimus therapy, although confirmation in future studies is needed.

Prognostic Significance of Pancreatic Metastases from Renal Cell Carcinoma in Patients Treated with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

AIM: The study aimed to define the true impact of pancreatic metastases (PM) from renal cell carcinoma on overall survival (OS) in patients treated with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Overall, 321 consecutive patients were analysed. The influence of PM on OS was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and the log-rank test (unadjusted and adjusted) and two multivariabe Cox proportional hazards regressions (CPHR). RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (10%) had PM and 287 (90%) had sites of metastasis other than the pancreas; the median OS was 46.1 and 23.1 months, respectively (unadjusted log-rank p=0.020; adjusted log-rank p=0.544). The PM status was an insignificant factor for OS in both CPHR (hazard ratio(HR)=0.84, p=0.603, and HR=0.66, p=0.098). CONCLUSION: The presence of PM was not an independent prognostic factor, but was rather an indicator of an indolent course of the disease.

Incorporating Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-lymphocyte Ratio in Place of Neutrophil Count and Platelet Count Improves Prognostic Accuracy of the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium Model.

PURPOSE: The study investigated whether a replacement of neutrophil count and platelet count by neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) within the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) model would improve its prognostic accuracy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis included consecutive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The IMDC and modified-IMDC models were compared using: concordance index (CI), bias-corrected concordance index (BCCI), calibration plots, the Grønnesby and Borgan test, Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), generalized R2, Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI), and continuous Net Reclassification Index (cNRI) for individual risk factors and the three risk groups. RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty-one patients were eligible for analyses. The modified-IMDC model with NLR value of 3.6 and PLR value of 157 was selected for comparison with the IMDC model. Both models were well calibrated. All other measures favoured the modified-IMDC model over the IMDC model (CI, 0.706 vs. 0.677; BCCI, 0.699 vs. 0.671; BIC, 2,176.2 vs. 2,190.7; generalized R2, 0.238 vs. 0.202; IDI, 0.044; cNRI, 0.279 for individual risk factors; and CI, 0.669 vs. 0.641; BCCI, 0.669 vs. 0.641; BIC, 2,183.2 vs. 2,198.1; generalized R2, 0.163 vs. 0.123; IDI, 0.045; cNRI, 0.165 for the three risk groups). CONCLUSION: Incorporation of NLR and PLR in place of neutrophil count and platelet count improved prognostic accuracy of the IMDC model. These findings require external validation before introducing into clinical practice.

Fuhrman Grade and Neutrophil-To-Lymphocyte Ratio Influence on Survival in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With First-Line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: The present study investigated the various features that might influence the overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of consecutive patients with metastatic RCC, in whom treatment with a first-line TKI was initiated from January 2010 to December 2014, at the Department of Oncology, Military Institute of Medicine (Warsaw, Poland). Cox proportional hazards regression was used to construct a prognostic model that included independent factors for OS. We validated the model using 2 bootstrap procedures and calculation of the bias-corrected concordance index. RESULTS: Of the 266 patients included in the study, 201, 45, and 20 received sunitinib, pazopanib, and sorafenib, respectively. The median OS for the whole cohort was 24.8 months (95% confidence interval, 20.2-29.4 months). Six factors were independently associated with poor survival: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status > 0 (P < .0001), Fuhrman grade 3 to 4 (P < .0001), hemoglobin less than the lower limit of normal (P < .0001), lactate dehydrogenase greater than the upper limit of normal (P = .0011), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ≥ 4 (P < .0001), and > 2 metastatic sites (P = .0012). The bias-corrected concordance index was 0.751. CONCLUSION: Fuhrman grade and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio are potential factors that affect the survival of patients with metastatic RCC treated with first-line TKIs. The presented prognostic model demonstrated satisfactory performance but requires external validation with a larger data set.

Second-line Treatment of Advanced Gastric Cancer: Current Options and Future Perspectives.

Due to its high incidence and poor prognosis, gastric cancer is an important health problem worldwide. The only possible curative treatment is to remove the primary tumor at an early stage of the disease. However, at diagnosis, most patients have unresectable or metastatic disease. Relapse in patients after primary surgery is frequent. In these patients, the aim of treatment is to extend the duration of survival and to improve quality of life and this accomplished by systemic therapies. Regimens containing fluoropyrimidine and platinum agents, in combination with trastuzumab in patients with overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), are recommended as the first-line treatment. Unfortunately, all patients develop progressive disease, but at least half of them are eligible for further treatment. This article presents current possibilities and near-future developments of chemotherapy and molecular targeted-therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer after failure of prior regimens containing fluoropyrimidine and platinum.