Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ginekol Pol ; 2023 Jul 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37417377

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The luteal phase supplementation (LPS) of the in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle is crucial to increase the chance of a live birth. There is no preferred progestogen for use in the general population. The optimal progestogen regimen in the event of prior IVF failure is unknown. The aim was to compare the live birth rate for dydrogesterone plus progesterone gel versus aqueous progesterone plus progesterone gel in LPS of the IVF cycle in women with at least one previous IVF failure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective randomized single-center study enrolled women with at least one previous IVF failure undergoing another IVF cycle. Women were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to 2 arms depending on LPS protocol: dydrogesterone (Duphaston®) + progesterone in vaginal gel (Crinone®) vs aqueous progesterone solution in subcutaneous injection (Prolutex®) + progesterone in vaginal gel (Crinone®). All women underwent fresh embryo transfer. RESULTS: The live birth rate with one prior IVF failure was 26.9% for D + PG vs 21.2% for AP + PG (p = 0.54), and with at least two IVF failures: 16% for D + PG vs 31.1% for AP + PG (p = 0.16). There were no significant differences in live birth rates between protocols, regardless of the number of prior IVF failures. CONCLUSIONS: In light of the evidence from this study that neither of the two LPS protocols is more effective in women with prior IVF failure, other factors, such as potential side effects, dosing convenience and patient preference, should be considered when choosing a treatment.

2.
Reprod Sci ; 29(12): 3521-3531, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35821349

RESUMO

Changes in coagulation and fibrinolysis have been reported in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) supporting a potential hypercoagulable condition related to this treatment. This study aimed at evaluating the changes in fibrin clot properties and thrombin generation induced by two different COH protocols: long with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and GnRH antagonist (GnRH-ant). Primary outcomes included determination of plasma fibrin clot properties, including clot permeability (Ks) and efficiency of fibrinolysis using clot lysis time (CLT), along with thrombin generation (prothrombin fragments 1 + 2) and endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) and fibrinolysis inhibitor levels. One hundred twenty-nine infertile women were included in the final analysis. The GnRH-ant protocol resulted in increased ETP (+ 9.8%) and reduced Ks (- 2.4%). Conversely, COH with the GnRH-a protocol reduced thrombin generation by decreasing both ETP (- 6.6%) and F1 + 2 (- 30.8%) together with favorably altered fibrin clot properties represented by increased Ks (+ 21.7%) and reduced CLT (- 13.8%) as well as decreased PAI-1 levels (by 2.5 times). The GnRH-ant compared to the GnRH-a protocol increased PAI-1 levels (+ 77.3%), thrombin generation (9.3% higher ETP), and Ks (+ 13.7%). In the GnRH-a group, post-COH Ks was 14.3% higher (Ks ≥ 7.92 × 10-9 cm2) in women with positive vs. negative pregnancy outcomes. Our results show that the GnRH-ant protocol enhanced thrombin generation and slightly decreased fibrin clot density. COH with the GnRH-a reduced thrombin generation and improved fibrin clot features. This trial was registered (NCT04166825). Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT04166825.


Assuntos
Infertilidade Feminina , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Trombina , Coagulação Sanguínea , Fibrinólise , Fibrina , Inibidor 1 de Ativador de Plasminogênio , Antagonistas de Hormônios , Indução da Ovulação , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina
3.
Ginekol Pol ; 76(9): 747-54, 2005 Sep.
Artigo em Polonês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16417089

RESUMO

Age-related infertility that is caused by diminished reproductive potential is both medical and social problem of a great concern. Changes in modern ways of life make women postpone the decision of starting up a family, what may reduce their chances of having a healthy baby. It is also a problem of subfertile couples who after many years of insufficient treating approach the period where the age imposes on primary causes of infertility, what even more reduces the chance of pregnancy. The main reason of this is increased number of chromosomal abnormalities resulting in lower quality of oocytes. There is a lot of research being held on the reconstruction of gametes by transferring the nucleus or cytoplasm among the oocytes derived from young and older patients. However, it has not brought the expected results so far. The method of preimplantation genetic diagnosis--aneuploidy screening (PGD-AS) in patients older than 35 gives some hope for improving the efficiency of infertility treatment. Nevertheless, oocyte donation still remains the most effective and applied method of assisted reproduction in the group of older patients.


Assuntos
Envelhecimento , Infertilidade Feminina/terapia , Idade Materna , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Serviços de Planejamento Familiar/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Diagnóstico Pré-Implantação/métodos , Saúde da Mulher
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...