RESUMO
While single cell studies have made significant impacts in various subfields of biology, they lag in the Glycosciences. To address this gap, we analyzed single-cell glycogene expressions in the Tabula Sapiens dataset of human tissues and cell types using a recent glycosylation-specific gene ontology (GlycoEnzOnto). At the median sequencing (count) depth, ~40-50 out of 400 glycogenes were detected in individual cells. Upon increasing the sequencing depth, the number of detectable glycogenes saturates at ~200 glycogenes, suggesting that the average human cell expresses about half of the glycogene repertoire. Hierarchies in glycogene and glycopathway expressions emerged from our analysis: nucleotide-sugar synthesis and transport exhibited the highest gene expressions, followed by genes for core enzymes, glycan modification and extensions, and finally terminal modifications. Interestingly, the same cell types showed variable glycopathway expressions based on their organ or tissue origin, suggesting nuanced cell- and tissue-specific glycosylation patterns. Probing deeper into the transcription factors (TFs) of glycogenes, we identified distinct groupings of TFs controlling different aspects of glycosylation: core biosynthesis, terminal modifications, etc. We present webtools to explore the interconnections across glycogenes, glycopathways, and TFs regulating glycosylation in human cell/tissue types. Overall, the study presents an overview of glycosylation across multiple human organ systems.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Knowledge on the molecular targets of diseases and drugs is crucial for elucidating disease pathogenesis and mechanism of action of drugs, and for driving drug discovery and treatment formulation. In this regard, high-throughput gene transcriptional profiling has become a leading technology, generating whole-genome data on the transcriptional alterations caused by diseases or drug compounds. However, identifying direct gene targets, especially in the background of indirect (downstream) effects, based on differential gene expressions is difficult due to the complexity of gene regulatory network governing the gene transcriptional processes. RESULTS: In this work, we developed a network analysis method, called DeltaNeTS+, for inferring direct gene targets of drugs and diseases from gene transcriptional profiles. DeltaNeTS+ uses a gene regulatory network model to identify direct perturbations to the transcription of genes using gene expression data. Importantly, DeltaNeTS+ is able to combine both steady-state and time-course expression profiles, as well as leverage information on the gene network structure. We demonstrated the power of DeltaNeTS+ in predicting gene targets using gene expression data in complex organisms, including Caenorhabditis elegans and human cell lines (T-cell and Calu-3). More specifically, in an application to time-course gene expression profiles of influenza A H1N1 (swine flu) and H5N1 (avian flu) infection, DeltaNeTS+ shed light on the key differences of dynamic cellular perturbations caused by the two influenza strains. CONCLUSION: DeltaNeTS+ is a powerful network analysis tool for inferring gene targets from gene expression profiles. As demonstrated in the case studies, by incorporating available information on gene network structure, DeltaNeTS+ produces accurate predictions of direct gene targets from a small sample size (~ 10 s). Integrating static and dynamic expression data with transcriptional network structure extracted from genomic information, as enabled by DeltaNeTS+, is crucial toward personalized medicine, where treatments can be tailored to individual patients. DeltaNeTS+ can be freely downloaded from http://www.github.com/cabsel/deltanetsplus .
