Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Pediatr Urol ; 11(5): 271.e1-6, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26096439

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is being utilized more frequently as a surgical technique in general surgery and in paediatric urology. It is associated with a steep learning curve. Currently, the centre does not offer a MIS training programme. It is hypothesized that the number of MIS procedures performed in the low-volume specialty of paediatric urology will offer insufficient training potential for surgeons. OBJECTIVE: To assess the MIS training potential of a highly specialized, tertiary care, paediatric urology training centre that has been accredited by the Joint Committee of Paediatric Urology (JCPU). STUDY DESIGN: The clinical activity of the department was retrospectively reviewed by extracting the annual number of admissions, outpatient consultations and operative procedures. The operations were divided into open procedures and MIS. Major ablative procedures (nephrectomy) and reconstructive procedures (pyeloplasty) were analysed with reference to the patients' ages. The centre policy is not to perform major MIS in children who are under 2 years old or who weigh less than 12 kg. RESULTS: Every year, this institution provides approximately 4300 out-patient consultations, 600 admissions, and 1300 procedures under general anaesthesia for children with urological problems. In 2012, 35 patients underwent major intricate MIS: 16 pyeloplasties, eight nephrectomies and 11 operations for incontinence (seven Burch, and four bladder neck procedures). In children ≥2 years of age, 16/21 of the pyeloplasties and 8/12 of the nephrectomies were performed laparoscopically. The remaining MIS procedures included 25 orchidopexies and one intravesical ureteral reimplantation. DISCUSSION: There is no consensus on how to assess laparoscopic training. It would be valuable to reach a consensus on a standardized laparoscopic training programme in paediatric urology. Often training potential is based on operation numbers only. In paediatric urology no minimum requirement has been specified. The number of procedures quoted for proficiency in MIS remains controversial. The MIS numbers for this centre correspond to, or exceed, numbers mentioned in other literature. To provide high-quality MIS training, exposure to laparoscopic procedures should be expanded. This may be achieved by centralizing patients into a common centre, collaborating with other specialities, modular training and training outside the operating theatre. CONCLUSION: Even in a high-volume, paediatric urology educational centre, the number of major MIS procedures performed remains relatively low, leading to limited training potential.


Assuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Internato e Residência , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/educação , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/educação , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/educação , Urologia/educação , Criança , Hospitais Pediátricos , Humanos , Curva de Aprendizado , Pediatria/educação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doenças Urológicas/cirurgia
2.
J Pediatr Urol ; 10(1): 67-73, 2014 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23863474

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To present an overview of the clinical presentation and pathological anatomy, and the results of surgical correction of 7 cases of epispadias with intact prepuce; a rare condition that has only occasionally been reported in literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective search was performed in the surgical and diagnoses database between 1991 and 2011. Seven cases of epispadias with intact prepuce were identified. Five presented as a webbed and buried penis, 1 as phimosis and 1 with suspicion for congenital anomaly of the genitalia. RESULTS: In 3 of 7 cases, epispadias was suspected or diagnosed at first presentation and could be surgically corrected in the first intervention. In the other 4 cases, epispadias was discovered during surgery, requiring an additional intervention to perform epispadias repair in 3 cases. One boy was diagnosed with glandular, 3 with coronal, 1 with shaft and 2 with penopubic epispadias. Epispadias repair was successful with regard to cosmesis and erectile function. Five patients developed normal continence after surgery, 1 after intensive urotherapy. An under average penile length was the main reported problem during follow-up. CONCLUSION: In the diagnostic process for a concealed penis, the possibility of epispadias should be considered. If epispadias is suspected or confirmed, epispadias repair can occur in the first intervention, reducing the number of additional interventions. Epispadias with intact prepuce appears to have a better prognosis concerning urinary continence compared to classical epispadias.


Assuntos
Epispadia/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/métodos , Epispadia/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Prognóstico , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...