Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 37(9): 1863-1870, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37184290

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Approximately 60% of patients with atopic dermatitis have involvement of the hands adding to the burden of disease. OBJECTIVE: This analysis aims to evaluate the effect of upadacitinib monotherapy on atopic hand eczema in patients with moderate-to-severe AD over 16 weeks in the Measure Up 1 and 2 studies. METHODS: Data from patients (ages 12-75) randomized 1:1:1 to receive upadacitinib 15 mg, 30 mg, or placebo once daily in the Measure Up 1 and 2 studies were analysed for impact on atopic hand eczema assessed using the Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI). The percent change from baseline in HECSI score was a prespecified additional endpoint at all visits. The proportion of patients with at least a 75% improvement in HECSI score (HECSI 75) was evaluated post hoc. RESULTS: Patients treated with upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg experienced greater improvement in HECSI score compared with placebo as early as Week 1, which was maintained through Week 16. At Week 16, the mean change from baseline in HECSI score for patients receiving upadacitinib 15 mg, 30 mg, and placebo was -68%, -74%, and -15% in Measure Up 1 and -68%, -74% and +21% (positive change indicates worsening for placebo) in Measure Up 2, respectively. A greater proportion of upadacitinib-treated patients achieved HECSI 75 compared with placebo at all timepoints beginning at Week 1 through Week 16. CONCLUSIONS: Upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg monotherapy provided rapid and sustained improvement in atopic hand eczema compared with placebo through Week 16 in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. At Week 16, the observed mean improvements in HECSI score in upadacitinib-treated patients were clinically meaningful based on previous interpretability studies. These results suggest that upadacitinib may be an effective treatment option for atopic hand eczema in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.


Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Eczema , Humanos , Dermatite Atópica/complicações , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Método Duplo-Cego , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Eczema/complicações , Eczema/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 74(9): 1667-75, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24748629

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous blisibimod, an inhibitor of B cell activating factor, in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in a dose-ranging Phase 2b clinical trial. METHODS: 547 patients with SLE with anti-double stranded DNA or antinuclear antibodies and Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-SLE Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) score ≥6 at baseline were randomised to receive placebo or blisibimod at one of 3 dose levels. The primary end point, measured at Week 24, was the SLE Responder Index-5 (SRI-5, meeting established SRI criteria but with ≥5 point improvement in SELENA-SLEDAI). RESULTS: Although SRI-5 response rates were not significantly improved in the pooled blisibimod groups compared with placebo, they were higher in subjects randomised to the highest dose of blisibimod (200 mg once-weekly (QW)) compared with pooled placebo, from Week 16 to Week 24, reaching statistical significance at Week 20 (p=0.02). SRI response rates compared with placebo were higher still in subjects who attained SELENA-SLEDAI improvements of ≥8, and in a subgroup of patients with severe disease (SELENA-SLEDAI ≥10 and receiving corticosteroids at baseline). In subjects with protein:creatine ratios of 1-6 at baseline, significant reductions in proteinuria were observed with blisibimod. Significant (p<0.01) changes in anti-double stranded DNA antibodies, complement C3 and C4, and reductions in B cells were observed with blisibimod.No imbalances in serious adverse events or infections (4/280 and 3/266), deaths (4/280 and 3/266) and malignancies (2/280 and 2/266) were reported for blisibimod compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: This study successfully identified a safe, effective and convenient dose, study population and end point for evaluation of blisibimod effect in Phase 3. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01162681.


Assuntos
Fatores Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/tratamento farmacológico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/administração & dosagem , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Anticorpos Antinucleares/imunologia , Antimaláricos/uso terapêutico , Complemento C3/imunologia , Complemento C4/imunologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/imunologia , Masculino , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/uso terapêutico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...