Nucleoside analog monotherapy for prophylaxis in Hepatitis B liver transplant patients is safe and efficacious.

BACKGROUND: Combination therapy with HBIG and NAs has reduced HBV recurrence post LT. Despite its efficacy, costs of HBIG remain prohibitive. With high-potency NAs, HBIG's use has been questioned. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HBIG-free regimens in patients transplanted for HBV-related liver disease. METHODS: A review of LT patients at the National University Hospital, Singapore from 2001 to 2015 was performed. Patients transplanted for HBV were divided by antiviral treatment received: high- or low-potency NAs, or a combination of HBIG with high-potency NAs. Post-transplant outcomes were reviewed till data censure. Primary outcome was recurrence of HBV viremia post-transplant, while secondary outcomes were HBsAg sero-clearance, graft survival and mortality. RESULTS: Among 58 patients, 51 (88%) had persistent HBV viral suppression. Patients on a high-potency agent had significantly higher viral suppression compared to those on a low-potency agent (97% vs 72%, p = 0.02). This was also seen in patients with VL detectable at transplant (100% vs 50%, p < 0.01). None of the 16 patients with VL detectable at transplant and treated with high-potency agents developed recurrence. 42 patients (72%) achieved persistent HBsAg sero-clearance. Although this was higher in the high-potency NA-only group, it was not statistically significant (p = 0.56). There were no graft failures or mortalities attributed to HBV recurrence. CONCLUSION: With the use of high-potency agents, HBIG may not be necessary in the treatment of patients transplanted for HBV-related liver disease, even in the presence of detectable VL at time of transplant.

A predictive nomogram to identify factors influencing the success of a concomitant laparoscopic cholecystectomy with common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis.

BACKGROUND: Single-staged laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) offers clear benefits in terms of cost and shorter hospitalization stays. However, a failed LCBDE requiring conversion to open surgery is associated with increased morbidity. This study reviewed the factors determining success of LCBDE, and created a predictive nomogram to stratify patients for the procedure. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 109 patients who underwent LCBDE was performed. A nomogram was developed from factors significantly associated with conversion to open surgery and validated. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients underwent a successful LCBDE, while 47 patients required a conversion to open CBDE. The presence of underlying cholangitis (crude OR 2.70, 95% CI: 1.12-6.56, p = 0.017), together with its subsequent interventions, seemed to adversely increase the rate of conversion to open surgery. The predictive factors included in the nomogram for a failed laparoscopic CBDE included prior antibiotic use (adjusted OR (AOR) 2.98, 95% CI: 1.17-7.57, p = 0.022), previous ERCP (AOR 4.99, 95% CI: 2.02-12.36, p = 0.001) and abnormal biliary anatomy (AOR 9.37, 95% CI: 2.18-40.20, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: LCBDE is useful for the treatment of choledocholithiasis. However, patients who were predicted to have an elevated risk for open conversion might not be ideal candidates for the procedure.