[Comparing the Health Needs of Older Aboriginal and Older Ethnic Chinese Individuals in Taiwan].

BACKGROUND: Providing healthcare to older people is an essential policy in Taiwan. Previous studies have assessed the health needs of older people residing in urban areas. Evidence related to the differences in healthcare needs between older aboriginal and older ethnic Chinese people in Taiwan is insufficient. As both groups exhibit mutually distinct physical and socio-cultural attributes, understanding their different health needs is necessary to provide tailored and effective healthcare. PURPOSE: To investigate the distinct health needs of older aboriginal and older ethnic Chinese using a comprehensive health-needs assessment tool. METHODS: A cross-sectional study design was used. Older people aged 65 or over were proportionally sampled from communities. The Elderly Assessment System Care Standard instrument was used to collect data through interviews held in participant homes or in community activity centers between October 20th and December 20th, 2011. RESULTS: A total of 180 older people were recruited. A majority of participants had at least one chronic disease, disability, or frailty. Across a range of dimensions and categories of health needs, older aboriginal people had statistically significant higher health needs than non-aboriginal ones. However, older ethnic Chinese participants had higher levels of need in the domains of housing/financing and social participation/isolation. Regression analysis found that independence, risk of frailty, and risk of falls explained the majority of health needs, with R2 values of 64% and 69.6% for older aboriginal and older ethnic Chinese participants, respectively. However, the respective impact of these three categories on overall health needs varied between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Based on our findings, healthcare providers should focus on improving the self-care capabilities of older aboriginal people and on reducing the risk of breakdowns in care for older ethnic Chinese people in order to enhance the quality of elderly care in Taiwan.

How to differentiate spontaneous intramural intestinal hemorrhage from acute mesenteric ischemia.

OBJECTS: The purpose of our study was to assess the diagnostic values of laboratory tests to differentiate spontaneous intramural intestinal hemorrhage (SIIH) from acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) after abdominal computed tomography (CT) survey in the emergency department (ED). METHOD: We retrospectively included 76 patients diagnosed SIIH or AMI after abdominal CT. RESULTS: The mean ages of 28 SIIH patients and 48 AMI patients were 75.9 ± 13.7 years and 75.8 ± 11.6 years, respectively. Patients with SIIH had significantly higher rate of Coumadin use (P < .001) and localized tenderness (P < .05). In laboratory findings, SIIH patients had prolonged prothrombin time (PT) (83.6 ± 30.0 vs. 13.4 ± 3.2, P < .001), lower blood urea nitrogen (P < .05), lower creatinine (P < .05), and lower creatine kinase (P < .05). Prolonged PT showed good discriminative value to differentiate acute abdomen patients with SIIH from AMI after abdominal CT, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.980 (95% confidence interval, 0.918-0.998; P < .0001). Prolonged PT cut-off value of ≧22.5 seconds had a sensitivity of 92.9% and a specificity of 100%. Logistic regression analysis identified prolonged PT as an independent predictor of SIIH (odds ratio, OR, 22.2; P = .007). CONCLUSION: Abdominal pain patients with either SIIH or AMI are rare in the ED, but abdominal CT sometimes cannot help to differentiate them due to similar CT findings. Prolonged PT might help emergency physicians and surgeons differentiate SIIH from AMI in such cases.

Non-compressibility ratio of sonography in deep venous thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: The risk of post-thrombotic syndrome and pulmonary embolism can be increased if there is failure to diagnose deep venous thrombosis (DVT) promptly. Emergency physicians (EPs) need a quick and readily available test to diagnose, treat and help them decide whether to discharge or admit DVT patients in a timely manner. The aim of this study was to investigate the value of the non-compressibility ratio of thrombosed veins in DVT patients, and give EPs an objective value to aid them in their decision-making with regard to DVT patients in the emergency department. METHODS: We reviewed 34 adult patients with DVT diagnosed by sonography in an emergency department. Medical records including demographic data and sonography results were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. RESULTS: Mean age was 72.9 ± 16.5 years. Group I comprised 14 patients (41.2%) who had DVT in the popliteal and femoral veins. Group II comprised 8 patients (23.5%) who had DVT isolated to the popliteal vein and 12 patients (35.3%) who had DVT isolated to the femoral vein. Group I had a significantly higher non-compressibility ratio than Group II (93.4 ± 6.2% vs. 80.1 ± 19.2%, p < 0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the non-compressibility ratio between discriminating groups was 0.711 (95% confidence interval, 0.527-0.854; p < 0.05). The clinical prognostic score of Group I was significantly higher than that of Group II (6.2 ± 1.8 vs. 4.1 ± 2.6, p < 0.05). There was a significant positive correlation between the non-compressibility ratio of the thrombosed vein and the clinical prognostic score (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The non-compressibility ratio of the thrombosed vein provides EPs with an objective test to evaluate the severity of DVT and to admit patients for consideration of adverse outcomes.