Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Med Surg (Lond) ; 78: 103857, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35734745

RESUMO

Background: The effects of impaired plasma glucose levels on predicting clinical outcomes and in-hospital events in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unknown. Therefore, we evaluated random blood glucose at admission and its association with clinical outcomes in STEMI patients treated with PCI. Methods: Patients with STEMI undergoing PCI were enrolled and were divided into 4 tertiles according to random blood glucose levels. Tertile 1 had levels below 100 mg/dL, tertile 2 had 100-200 mg/dL, tertile 3 had 200-300 mg/dL, and tertile 4 had random blood glucose levels >300 mg/dL. The cumulative rates of in-hospital mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events were calculated. Results: Both the incidence of all-cause deaths and cumulative rates of major adverse cardiovascular events were significantly the lowest in patients within tertile 1. The cumulative incidence of in-hospital events was 14.3% in tertile 1, 17.6% in tertile 2, 23.5% in tertile 3, and 30.8% in tertile 4. The odds ratio of major adverse cardiovascular events was 1.286 [0.397-4.161] in tertile 2, 1.846 [0.492-6.927] in tertile 3, and 2.667 [0.693-10.254] in tertile 4. The cumulative proportion of adverse events was seen higher in tertile 4 on Kaplan-Meier log-rank (chi-square: 8.094, p = 0.044). Conclusion: Poor glycemic control or stress hyperglycemia on admission experienced the highest rates of major adverse cardiovascular events including deaths. Plasma random glucose was predictive of a worse prognosis for STEMI patients undergoing PCI in our study.

2.
Ann Med Surg (Lond) ; 76: 103527, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35371473

RESUMO

Background: & Objectives: We conducted this single-centered retrospective study including female patients infected with COVID-19 with aim to compare laboratory findings and the outcomes between pregnant and non-pregnant women infected with COVID-19. Previous data rendered pregnant women as vulnerable population for COVID-19. Methods: We included 131 patients in our analysis out of which 60 were pregnant females and rest 71 were non-pregnant females. Results: Factors like fatigue, total leukocyte count (TLC) and neutrophils were higher in pregnant patients, while mean age, fever, hemoglobin, ferritin, D-dimer and use of mechanical ventilation was lower in pregnant patients as compared to non-pregnant females. Conclusion: Our study concluded that COVID-19 do not show significant high risk of disease severity when compared with non-pregnant females of similar age group.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...