Synergistic Coronary Artery Calcium Modification With Combined Atherectomy and Intravascular Lithotripsy.

BACKGROUND: Severe coronary artery calcification (CAC) remains challenging during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and often requires 1 or more advanced calcium modification tools. OBJECTIVES: We describe the combination use of rotational (RA) or orbital atherectomy (OA), with intravascular lithotripsy (IVL), termed rotatripsy and orbital-tripsy, respectively, for modifying CAC prior to stent implantation during PCI. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients treated with rotatripsy or orbital-tripsy at our center between July 2019 and March 2022. The primary efficacy endpoint was procedural success (successful stent implantation, <30% residual stenosis visually, Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 3 flow; absence of types C to F dissection/perforation or loss of side branch ≥2.0mm visually) without in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE, defined as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction [MI], target-vessel revascularization). RESULTS: A total of 25 patients (14 rotatripsy and 11 orbital-tripsy) were included in our study. The mean age was 72.2 ± 7.6 years and 76% were men. PCI was guided by intravascular imaging in 24 patients (96%). All cases were treated with either RA or OA before utilization of IVL. Procedural success was achieved in 22 cases (88%) with 1 sidebranch loss without periprocedural MI (4%) and 2 in-patient deaths (8%) unrelated to the procedure (1 intracerebral hemorrhage and 1 cardiac arrest). CONCLUSION: We describe efficacious use of both rotatripsy and orbital-tripsy to modify severe CAC during PCI in a real-world setting. Intravascular imaging can guide appropriate use of these devices to complement each other to modify severe CAC to achieve optimal outcomes.

Critical Left Main Coronary Stenosis After Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement.

Our case illustrates the feasibility of high-risk PCI to salvage LMCA stenosis, possibly caused by coronary injury during direct coronary cardioplegia for a recent triple-valve operation.

Role of copeptin in dual-cardiac marker strategy for patients with chest pain presented to ED.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to evaluate the role of copeptin in the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and its role in dual-cardiac marker diagnostic strategy with troponin. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study was carried out from May 2012 to October 2012. SETTING: The study was conducted at the emergency department (ED) of a public hospital in a cluster of Hong Kong. METHODS: Patients aged at least 18 years presented with chest pain to ED who have intermediate or high likelihood of ACS were included. All patients had blood taken in the ED for copeptin and troponin I. The adjudicated diagnoses of ACS were made by 2 independent physicians based on the universal definition. Diagnostic characteristics were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic curves were created. Areas under the curves were compared for copeptin, troponin I, and dual-marker strategy with copeptin and troponin I. RESULTS: A total of 637 patients were recruited. Seventy-eight had been diagnosed to be ACS. The negative predictive value of copeptin for ACS was 0.881 (0.849-0.907) compared with troponin I, 0.937 (0.913-0.956). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of copeptin, troponin I, and dual-marker strategy were 0.68, 0.859, and 0.880, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of copeptin to troponin does not have significant improvement of the diagnostic accuracy of ACS in patients presented with chest pain.