Is the Impedance Baseline Helpful in the Evaluation of Globus Patients?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been suggested to be responsible for 23-68% of globus cases. The impedance baseline (IB) acquired by 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance monitoring has been proven to represent esophageal mucosal integrity. We aimed to investigate whether the IB is helpful for evaluating globus patients. METHODS: Twenty-four-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance pH tracings (MII-pH) were evaluated in globus patients. Differences in the IB between the acid reflux, non-acid reflux, and no reflux groups were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were obtained to determine the optimal measurement point from the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). RESULTS: A total of 62 patients were analyzed. MII-pH showed that acid reflux, non-acid reflux, and no reflux were present in 13, 5, and 44 patients, respectively. The acid reflux group had a significantly lower IB than the other groups at a location 3 cm from the LES. ROC curve analysis revealed that placement at a position 3 cm from the LES resulted in moderate diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve = 0.88). When we set 2500 Ω as the cut-off value for acid reflux at a position 3 cm from the LES, the additional diagnostic yield for acid reflux was increased by 19.4% compared with that obtained by MII-pH. CONCLUSIONS: IB is complementary to pH findings enabling identification of a subset of patients with co-existing acid reflux. Catheter place-ment at a location 3 cm from the LES and a cut-off value of 2500 Ω may be reasonable criteria for estimating acid reflux.

Prospective assessment of risk of bacteremia following colorectal stent placement.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal stent insertion is an invasive endoscopic procedure. However, there are no reports regarding the incidence of bacteremia with colorectal stent. OBJECTIVE: This study was to evaluate the risk of bacteremia and infectious complications after stent insertion for colorectal obstruction. METHODS: Patients who underwent colorectal stent insertion were enrolled consecutively. Blood cultures were obtained before colorectal stent insertion and at 30 min after the procedure. Patients were monitored for 48 h after colorectal stent insertion to detect the development of infectious complications. Procedural data collected included location of obstruction, degree of bowel preparation, obstructive symptoms, and the time required for the procedure. RESULTS: Of 64 patients undergoing colorectal stent, four (6.3%) had a positive post-stent blood culture. All patients, including those with positive cultures, remained asymptomatic during the 48 h after the procedure. Site of obstruction, degree of bowel preparation, age, and underlying disease were not different between the two groups. Development of bacteremia was associated with long procedure time (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal stent insertion does not induce significant bacteremia in patients with colorectal obstruction. These findings suggest that the routine use of prophylactic antibiotics may not be necessary in colorectal stent insertion.

[Steroid responsive pancreatic mass-forming type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis].

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) has two distinct subsets. Type 1 AIP or lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis is systemic disease with the elevation in serum levels of the IgG4. Type 2 AIP, also called duct-centric pancreatitis, features granulocyte epithelial lesions with duct obstruction in the pancreas without systemic involvement. Here, we report a case of type 2 AIP diagnosed by pathology, which is the first report in Korea. The case is a 56-year-old woman who presented with anorexia and vomiting. Computed tomography revealed mass-like lesion in the pancreatic head and the compression of the distal common bile duct and the head portion of the main pancreatic duct. Serum levels of the IgG4 were normal. Histologic examination revealed a dense neutrophil infiltration in the pancreatic parenchyme associated with extensive fibrosis, thereby confirming the diagnosis of type 2 AIP. The abnormalities in the clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings improved after oral steroid treatment.