Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Rehabil ; 28(11): 1107-14, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24803644

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of virtual reality (VR) rehabilitation on upper extremity motor performance of patients with early stroke. DESIGN: Pilot randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Rehabilitation wards. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty three adults with stroke (mean age (SD) = 58.35 (13.45) years and mean time since stroke (SD) = 16.30 (7.44) days). INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to VR group (n=11) or control group (n=12). VR group received nine 30 minutes upper extremity VR therapy in standing (five weekdays in two weeks) plus conventional therapy, which included physical and occupational therapy. Control group received only conventional therapy, which was comparable to total training time received by VR group (mean training hours (SD):VR = 17.07 (2.86); control = 15.50 (2.79)). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA). Secondary outcomes included Action Research Arm Test, Motor Activity Log and Functional Independence Measure. Results were taken at baseline, post intervention and 1-month post intervention. Participants' feedback and adverse effects were recorded. RESULTS: All participants improved in FMA scores (mean change (SD) = 11.65 (8.56), P<.001). These effects were sustained at one month after intervention (mean (SD) change from baseline = 18.67 (13.26), P<.001). All other outcome measures showed similar patterns. There were no significant differences in improvement between both groups. Majority of the participants found VR training useful and enjoyable, with no serious adverse effects reported. CONCLUSION: Although additional VR training was not superior to conventional therapy alone, this study demonstrates the feasibility of VR training in early stroke.


Assuntos
Atividades Cotidianas , Terapia Ocupacional/métodos , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Extremidade Superior/fisiopatologia , Terapia de Exposição à Realidade Virtual/métodos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Intervenção Médica Precoce , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Medição de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Sexuais , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Urol Oncol ; 29(2): 177-82, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19362862

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We report the natural history of voiding function in men with clinically localized prostate cancer after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RLRP), describing the trend of functional recovery, which is currently not well described using the robot-assisted laparoscopic approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We determined the impact on voiding function by prospectively evaluating 100 consecutive men who underwent RLRP between May 2005 and December 2006 and compared their reported International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Quality of Life (QOL) scores at 3, 6, and 12 months with preoperative scores after surgery. Patients with preoperative IPSS of 0-7 and 8-35 were defined as having mild lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and moderate to severe LUTS, respectively. RESULTS: Continence was achieved in 82%, 87%, and 91% of men at 3, 6, and 12 months after RLRP, respectively. There were statistically and clinically significant improvements in both IPSS and QOL preoperative scores at all studied time points for patients with moderate to severe preexisting LUTS. The mean IPSS scores for these patients preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery were 14.1, 5.2, 3.0, and 2.9, respectively and the corresponding mean QOL scores were 3.4, 2.1, 1.6, and 1.6, respectively. Patients with mild preexisting LUTS showed no statistically significant improvement in IPSS at 3 and 6 months after surgery but significant improvement was found at 1 year (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Good continence recovery is expected in most patients undergoing RLRP. Patients with moderate to severe preexisting LUTS can expect early and clinically significant symptom and QOL improvements after RLRP. Patients with mild preexisting LUTS show significant symptom improvement at 1 year.


Assuntos
Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/fisiopatologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Micção/fisiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Pós-Operatório , Período Pré-Operatório , Estudos Prospectivos , Prostatectomia/instrumentação , Qualidade de Vida , Robótica , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA