SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Health Care Personnel and Their Household Contacts at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center: Protocol for a Longitudinal Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Health care personnel (HCP) are at high risk for exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. While personal protective equipment (PPE) may mitigate this risk, prospective data collection on its use and other risk factors for seroconversion in this population is needed. OBJECTIVE: The primary objectives of this study are to (1) determine the incidence of, and risk factors for, SARS-CoV-2 infection among HCP at a tertiary care medical center and (2) actively monitor PPE use, interactions between study participants via electronic sensors, secondary cases in households, and participant mental health and well-being. METHODS: To achieve these objectives, we designed a prospective, observational study of SARS-CoV-2 infection among HCP and their household contacts at an academic tertiary care medical center in North Carolina, USA. Enrolled HCP completed frequent surveys on symptoms and work activities and provided serum and nasal samples for SARS-CoV-2 testing every 2 weeks. Additionally, interactions between participants and their movement within the clinical environment were captured with a smartphone app and Bluetooth sensors. Finally, a subset of participants' households was randomly selected every 2 weeks for further investigation, and enrolled households provided serum and nasal samples via at-home collection kits. RESULTS: As of December 31, 2020, 211 HCP and 53 household participants have been enrolled. Recruitment and follow-up are ongoing and expected to continue through September 2021. CONCLUSIONS: Much remains to be learned regarding the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among HCP and their household contacts. Through the use of a multifaceted prospective study design and a well-characterized cohort, we will collect critical information regarding SARS-CoV-2 transmission risks in the health care setting and its linkage to the community. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/25410.

Rural Interfacility Emergency Department Transfers: Framework and Qualitative Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Interfacility transfers from rural emergency departments (EDs) are an important means of access to timely and specialized care. METHODS: Our goal was to identify and explore facilitators and barriers in transfer processes and their implications for emergency rural care and access. Semi-structured interviews with ED staff at five rural and two urban Veterans Health Administration (VHA) hospitals were recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed using an iterative inductive-deductive approach to identify themes and construct a conceptual framework. RESULTS: From 81 interviews with clinical and administrative staff between March-June 2018, four themes in the interfacility transfer process emerged: 1) patient factors; 2) system resources; and 3) processes and communication for transfers, which culminate in 4) the location decision. Current and anticipated resource limitations were highly influential in transfer processes, which were described as burdensome and diverting resources from clinical care for emergency patients. Location decision was highly influenced by complexity of the transfer process, while perceived quality at the receiving location or patient preferences were not reported in interviews as being primary drivers of location decision. Transfers were described as burdensome for patients and their families. Finally, patients with mental health conditions epitomized challenges of emergency transfers. CONCLUSION: Interfacility transfers from rural EDs are multifaceted, resource-driven processes that require complex coordination. Anticipated resource needs and the transfer process itself are important determinants in the location decision, while quality of care or patient preferences were not reported as key determinants by interviewees. These findings identify potential benefits from tracking transfer boarding as an operational measure, directed feedback regarding outcomes of transferred patients, and simplified transfer processes.

Risk factors associated with voiding dysfunction after anti-incontinence surgery.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study is to investigate the risk factors of voiding dysfunction occurring within 1 month after surgical treatment of urinary incontinence. METHODS: Medical records of 903 women who underwent anti-incontinence surgery at Yonsei Medical Health System from January 1999 to April 2007 were reviewed. The patient demographics, urodynamic parameters, pelvic organ prolapse stage, surgical procedures, and concomitant surgery were retrospectively evaluated. Postoperative voiding dysfunction was defined as post-void residual urine measuring greater than 100 cc at two or more successive trials. RESULTS: Age, menopausal status, maximum flow rate, average flow rate, post-void residual, anti-incontinence surgery type, stage of pelvic organ prolapse, and concomitant prolapse surgery were associated predictors of voiding dysfunction after anti-incontinence surgery. In multivariate analysis, concomitant anterior colporrhaphy (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.38-4.11) was the only independent risk factor. CONCLUSIONS: The most important risk factor associated with voiding dysfunction was concomitant anterior colporrhaphy.

Comparison of the treatment outcome of pubovaginal sling, tension-free vaginal tape, and transobturator tape for stress urinary incontinence with intrinsic sphincter deficiency.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the treatment outcome of 3 sling procedures for stress urinary incontinence with intrinsic sphincter deficiency. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective study included 253 patients who underwent incontinence surgery (pubovaginal sling [PVS] = 87, tension-free vaginal tape [TVT] = 94, and transobturator tape [TOT] = 72) for urodynamic stress incontinence with intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Analysis of variance, chi(2) test, Fisher's exact test, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and Cox proportional hazard regression were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Overall complication rates were not significantly different. At 2 years postoperatively, the cumulative cure rates of the PVS, TVT, and TOT groups were significantly different (87.25%, 86.94%, and 34.89%, respectively; P < .0001). The risk of treatment failure in women who received TOT was 4.6 times higher than in women who underwent PVS. The 7-year cumulative cure rates of PVS and TVT groups were 59.10% and 55.09%, respectively. CONCLUSION: PVS and TVT were more efficacious, but the long-term cure rates were low.