Variation in Twitter posts referencing pediatric sleep aids.

OBJECTIVES: Over 50% of parents who use social media seek parenting advice, however little is known about social media discussions surrounding child sleep aid use. The current study investigated Twitter posts about the use of pediatric sleep aids (melatonin, cannabidiol, weighted blankets, and essential oils), including post frequency, user characteristics, and content. In addition, variation in tweets before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic was examined. METHODS: Twitter was searched over a 25-month period using TweetDeck. Tweets were coded for user characteristics (eg, affiliations, gender) and content (eg, tone, states sleep or health outcomes, reference to a neurodevelopmental condition). RESULTS: Of the 2754 tweets analyzed, melatonin was referenced most often (60%), followed by essential oils (23%), weighted blankets (14%), and cannabidiol (3%). Most were published by individual users (77%) and were positive (51%) in tone. About 1-third of tweets noted positive sleep or health effects of the sleep aid and only 7% referenced a neurodevelopmental condition. Tweets about pediatric sleep aids increased during the pandemic, primarily those posts about melatonin. CONCLUSIONS: Melatonin is the most commonly discussed sleep aid on Twitter, followed by essential oils. Tweets are primarily positive. The number of tweets about sleep aids, specifically melatonin, has increased with time, with significantly more tweets after the start of the pandemic. Clinicians should consider using this outlet to provide empirically-based information regarding the efficacy and benefits or risks of sleep aid use in children.

A multimethod evaluation of bed provision and sleep education for young children and their families living in poverty.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the impact of bed provision and sleep education through the Beds for Kids (BfK) program on early childhood sleep and behavior and maternal mood and sleep. METHODS: Twenty-seven mother-child dyads (childage= 2-5 years, 85.2% Black) living in poverty and without an individual child bed were randomly assigned (multimethod randomized waitlist control trial design) to BfK intervention ∼1 week postbaseline (initial intervention) or ∼2 weeks postbaseline (waitlist control), with follow-up at 1 month. BfK intervention (home bed delivery and written sleep health education) was provided to all families. Children wore actigraphs and mothers completed daily diaries to assess child and maternal sleep, child behavior, and maternal mood for the initial 1-week comparison period. Maternal-reported child sleep and behavior (internalizing and externalizing problems) were collected at 1 month after BfK participation for all families; 11 families completed a qualitative interview at 1-month follow-up. RESULTS: At 1 week after BfK, mothers' sleep duration increased by 1 hour compared to that of waitlist controls. No changes were found in child sleep, child behavior, or maternal mood. However, at 1 month after BfK intervention, improvements were found in mother-reported child night awakenings, sleep quality, sleep problems, and behavior. Mothers qualitatively reported significant BfK benefits for child sleep and family well-being, although they noted challenges to transitioning young children to sleeping independently. CONCLUSIONS: Bed provision and sleep education for families living in poverty has an immediate impact on maternal sleep and reported well-being. Child sleep and behavioral improvements are seen by 1 month, with children experiencing an initial adjustment period to sleeping independently. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Impact of Beds for Kids Program on Child Sleep; URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03392844; Identifier: NCT03392844. CITATION: Williamson AA, Min J, Fay K, Cicalese O, Meltzer LJ, Mindell JA. A multimethod evaluation of bed provision and sleep education for young children and their families living in poverty. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(9):1583-1594.

Discrepancies Between Caregiver Reported Early Childhood Sleep Problems and Clinician Documentation and Referral.

OBJECTIVE: The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends routine sleep problem screenings during child well-visits. However, studies suggest a discrepancy between caregiver- and clinician-reported child sleep problems. The present study examines whether caregiver-reported child sleep problems (ie, habitual snoring, insomnia symptoms, poor sleep health) and clinician-documented child sleep problems and management are congruent. METHODS: The sample included 170 caregiver-child dyads (child Mage = 3.3 years, range = 2-5 years; 56.5% girls; 64.1% Black, 20.0% non-Latinx White, and 4.1% Latinx; 86.5% maternal caregiver reporter). Caregivers' questionnaire-based reports of habitual snoring, insomnia symptoms, and sleep health behaviors (nighttime electronics, caffeine intake, insufficient sleep) were compared with clinician documentation in the electronic health record. RESULTS: About 92.3% of children had at least 1 caregiver-reported sleep problem (66% insomnia symptoms, 64% electronics, 38% insufficient sleep, 21% caffeine, 17% snoring). In contrast, a substantially lower percent of children had a clinician documented sleep problem (20% overall; 10% insomnia symptoms, 7% electronics, 0% insufficient sleep, 3% caffeine, 4% snoring), sleep-related referral (1% overall; 0.6% Otolaryngology, 0.6% polysomnogram, 0% sleep clinic), or recommendation (12% overall; 8% insomnia symptoms, 4% electronics, 0% insufficient sleep, 1% caffeine). CONCLUSIONS: There is a vast discrepancy between caregiver-reported child sleep problems and clinician-documented sleep problems and management, with a higher proportion of caregiver reports. To benefit overall child health and well-being, future research and quality improvement initiatives should focus on enhancing screening tools and educational opportunities to improve clinician documentation and enhance family conversations about early childhood sleep problems.

Sleep Well! An adapted behavioral sleep intervention implemented in urban primary care.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To describe the adaptation, feasibility, and initial outcomes of Sleep Well!, an intervention for early childhood insomnia and insufficient sleep, designed for families from lower-socioeconomic status backgrounds presenting to large metropolitan primary care sites. METHODS: Fifteen caregiver-child dyads (caregivers: 92.3% mothers, 80.0% Black, 53.3% ≤ 125% US poverty level; children: 73.3% female, 86.7% Black, mean age = 3.0 years) participated in this multimethod, single-arm trial. A family advisory board of caregivers (n = 4) and a clinician advisory board of sleep experts, primary care clinicians, and psychologists (n = 13) provided intervention feedback throughout the pilot. Most adaptations were related to intervention delivery methods, with some related to sleep strategies. At postintervention, caregivers completed surveys on intervention acceptability and cultural humility (primary outcomes) and completed semistructured interviews. Caregivers also reported on child sleep pre- and postintervention. RESULTS: Thirteen (86.6%) families completed Sleep Well! and 12 (80.0%) completed pre- and postintervention measures. Caregivers reported strong intervention acceptability and cultural humility. There were preintervention to postintervention reductions in child sleep problems, bedroom electronics, sleep onset latency, and night awakening frequency and duration. Nighttime sleep duration and overall insufficient sleep also improved. Qualitative data also showed strong intervention acceptability and perceived flexibility, with few participation barriers. CONCLUSIONS: A brief, early childhood behavioral sleep intervention delivered in primary care with families from primarily lower-socioeconomic status backgrounds and/or racially minoritized backgrounds is feasible to implement, with strong retention rates, acceptability, and perceptions of cultural humility. Child sleep improvements are positive and warrant replication in a randomized controlled trial. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Implementing Behavioral Sleep Intervention in Urban Primary Care; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04046341; Identifier: NCT04046341. CITATION: Williamson AA, Okoroji C, Cicalese O, et al. Sleep Well! An adapted behavioral sleep intervention implemented in urban primary care. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(4):1153-1166.

Sleep Problems, Cumulative Risks, and Psychological Functioning in Early Childhood.

BACKGROUND: Sleep problems and cumulative risk factors (e.g., caregiver depression, socioeconomic disadvantage) have independently been linked to adverse child development, but few studies have examined the interplay of these factors. We examined whether cumulative risk exposure moderated the link between sleep problems, including insomnia and poor sleep health, and child psychological outcomes. METHODS: 205 caregiver-child dyads (child Mage = 3.3 years; 53.7% girls; 62.9% Black, 22.4% non-Latinx White, and 4.4% Latinx; 85.4% maternal caregiver reporter) completed child sleep, family sociodemographic, and child psychological functioning (internalizing, externalizing, and executive functioning) questionnaires. Indexes of cumulative risk exposure, insomnia symptoms, and poor sleep health were created. RESULTS: Ninety percent of children had ≥1 cumulative risks, 62.9% had ≥1 insomnia symptom, and 84.5% had ≥1 poor sleep health behavior. Increased insomnia symptoms were significantly associated with increased child internalizing, externalizing, and global executive functioning impairments controlling for child age, race/ethnicity, and sex. Poor sleep health behaviors were associated with internalizing concerns. Cumulative risk exposure was not associated with outcomes but moderated the association between insomnia symptoms and all psychological outcomes, such that children with higher cumulative risk exposure and insomnia symptoms had the greatest impairments. Children with the poorest sleep health behaviors and highest cumulative risks had the greatest internalizing concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Insomnia symptoms in particular are associated with poor child outcomes, which are exacerbated when accompanied by greater cumulative risk exposure. Clinicians should assess sleep when treating early psychological concerns, especially within the context of increased cumulative risks.

Early Childhood Sleep Intervention in Urban Primary Care: Caregiver and Clinician Perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Despite significant income-related disparities in pediatric sleep, few early childhood sleep interventions have been tailored for or tested with families of lower socio-economic status (SES). This qualitative study assessed caregiver and clinician perspectives to inform adaptation and implementation of evidence-based behavioral sleep interventions in urban primary care with families who are predominantly of lower SES. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with (a) 23 caregivers (96% mothers; 83% Black; 65% ≤125% U.S. poverty level) of toddlers and preschoolers with insomnia or insufficient sleep and (b) 22 urban primary care clinicians (physicians, nurse practitioners, social workers, and psychologists; 87% female; 73% White). Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, the interview guide assessed multilevel factors across five domains related to intervention implementation. Qualitative data were analyzed using an integrated approach to identify thematic patterns across participants and domains. RESULTS: Patterns of convergence and divergence in stakeholder perspectives emerged across themes. Participants agreed upon the importance of child sleep and intervention barriers (family work schedules; household and neighborhood factors). Perspectives aligned on intervention (flexibility; collaborative and empowering care) and implementation (caregiver-to-caregiver support and use of technology) facilitators. Clinicians identified many family barriers to treatment engagement, but caregivers perceived few barriers. Clinicians also raised healthcare setting factors that could support (integrated care) or hinder (space and resources) implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Findings point to adaptations to evidence-based early childhood sleep intervention that may be necessary for effective implementation in urban primary care. Such adaptations could potentially reduce significant pediatric sleep-related health disparities.