Bendamustine impairs humoral but not cellular immunity to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in rituximab-treated B-cell lymphoma-affected patients.

Background: Patients with B-cell lymphoma are a fragile category of subjects, particularly exposed to infections and characterized by an impaired vaccination response due to the disease itself and, even more, to the chemotherapy regimen. For this reason, extensive knowledge of the immune response status of these subjects is of fundamental importance to obtain possible indications for a tailored immunization strategy. Methods: We enrolled two cohorts of patients with B-cell lymphoma under rituximab treatment or 3-24 months after treatment. In all patients, we evaluated both humoral and cellular immunological memory toward SARS-CoV-2, after standard vaccination and upon one booster dose. Results: We observed no Spike-specific IgG production in patients (n = 25) under anti-CD20 treatment, whereas patients (n = 16) vaccinated after the completion of chemotherapy showed a higher humoral response. Evaluating SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell response, we found that patients in both cohorts had developed robust cellular immunity after vaccination. Of the 21 patients (51%) that experienced a breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection, only six patients developed severe disease. Interestingly, these six patients had all been treated with rituximab plus bendamustine. Notably, we observed that Spike-specific IgG levels in patients treated with rituximab plus bendamustine were absent or lower compared with those in patients treated with rituximab plus other chemotherapy, whereas Spike-specific T-cell response was not different based on chemotherapy regiment. Discussion: Our results show that, in patients with B-cell lymphoma under rituximab therapy, anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination induces a weak or absent humoral response but a consistent T-cell response. In addition, chemotherapy regimens with bendamustine further reduce patients' ability to mount a Spike-specific humoral response even after a long time period from chemotherapy discontinuation. These results provide evidence that different chemotherapeutics display different immunosuppressive properties that could be taken in to account in the choice of the right drug regimen for the right patient. Moreover, they question whether immunocompromised patients, particularly those treated with bendamustine, need interventions to improve vaccine-induced immune response.

Ibrutinib in relapsed/refractory patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia: a real-life, retrospective study on behalf of the "RTL" (regional Tuscan lymphoma network).

Ibrutinib represents the first approved treatment for patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). There are very few published experiences outside of a clinical trial. In this study, we investigated treatment response, survival, and safety in a real life setting. We retrospectively analyzed 49 consecutive R/R WM patients, managed in 8 Tuscan onco-hematological centers, that received ibrutinib after its approval, at a maximum dose of 420 mg once per day, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Median age was 65 years (range 32-86), and the median number of previous regimens was 2 (range 1-5). Overall and major response rate were 91.8% and 87.7%, respectively. At best response, median IgM level declined from 3,094 to 831 mg/dl, and Hb level increased from 10.4 to 12.7 g/dl. In an intention-to-treat analysis, 36/49 patients (73.5%) were still receiving treatment, while 13/49 (26.5%) had discontinued therapy. Six out of 49 cases (12.2%) relapsed after an initial response, and 13/49 (26.5%) had a dose reduction. Estimated 2-year PFS, DOR, and OS were 76.7%, 88.7%, and 84.1%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 18.3 months, 43/49 patients (87.8%) were alive. The most frequent AE included atrial fibrillation or flutter (6/49 cases, 12.2%), bleeding (6/49 cases, 12.2%), arthralgia/myalgia (5/49 cases, 10.2%). Ibrutinib is a suitable treatment option for R/R WM patients and also suggested by ESMO, NCCN, and other societies. PFS and OS were durable, and DOR was sustained for responsive patients. Treatment toxicity is not negligible, but manageable in most cases without treatment discontinuation.