Systematic Review of the Incidence and/or Prevalence of Eating Disorders in Individuals With Food Allergies.

BACKGROUND: Chronic diseases involving strict dietary adherence have been associated with an increased risk of eating disorders (EDs). This is the first systematic review investigating the rate of EDs among individuals with food allergies (FAs). OBJECTIVE: To report the incidence, prevalence, and types of EDs in individuals with FAs. METHODS: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched 4 databases for studies published to January 2022 that reported the prevalence or incidence of EDs in samples with immunoglobulin E (IgE) or non-IgE-mediated allergy. Risk of bias was assessed and evidence qualitatively synthesized. RESULTS: From 1,180 papers identified, 9 met inclusion criteria. There were 4,161 adult and pediatric participants with IgE-mediated FAs or eosinophilic esophagitis. Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) or anorexia nervosa/bulimia nervosa were the main EDs identified. The prevalence of EDs in samples with FA ranged from 0.8% to 62.9%. Among studies investigating IgE-mediated FA (n = 6), the prevalence of anorexia nervosa and/or bulimia nervosa ranged from 17.6 to 61%, ARFID was 62.9%, and unspecified EDs was 0.8% to 6%. Among samples with eosinophilic esophagitis (n = 3), ARFID prevalence ranged from 4.5% to 51%. Most studies were limited by small sample size, possible selection bias, and lack of diagnostic EDs tools validated for food allergic populations. CONCLUSIONS: Eating disorders appear prevalent in individuals with FA; however, prevalence estimates varied widely. Large studies with healthy control groups and validated measures to identify EDs in individuals with FA are needed to accurately determine the prevalence of EDs.

Complementary and Allergenic Food Introduction in Infants: An Umbrella Review.

BACKGROUND: Multiple systematic reviews examine the introduction of foods in relation to individual health outcomes, but the balance of harms and benefits has not been overviewed systematically. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to perform an overview of systematic reviews on age of introduction of complementary and allergenic foods to the infant diet and long and short-term health outcomes. DATA SOURCES: We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed (July 25, 2022). STUDY SELECTION: Included systematic reviews examining the introduction of complementary or allergenic foods before age 1. Outcomes included allergic, autoimmune, and inflammatory diseases, neurodevelopment, nutrition, and weight. DATA EXTRACTION: Extraction and quality assessment were performed in duplicate (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) and strength of evidence was assessed. RESULTS: We screened 4015 articles and included 32 systematic reviews. There was moderate evidence that peanut and egg should be introduced from 4 to 11 months to prevent food allergy (6 of 10 reviews). Complementary food introduction was not associated with food allergy. Moderate certainty evidence suggested age of complementary food introduction was not associated with eczema. Age at introduction of gluten was not associated with celiac disease (high certainty evidence; 3 of 4 reviews). Low certainty evidence indicated that introducing solids before 4 months may increase the risk of childhood obesity, but not growth. There was insufficient evidence regarding an association between any food introduction and bone health, gastrointestinal diseases, autoimmune disorders, asthma, or allergic rhinitis. LIMITATIONS: Gray literature was not included. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence supports introducing complementary foods around 6 months and allergenic foods before 11 months.