A case for stronger integration of physical landscape processes in conservation science and practice.

I argue that the dynamic nature of contemporary, landscape-shaping (geomorphic) processes deserves more consideration in conservation science and practice. In an analysis of a sample of fundamental terms related to geomorphology and area-based conservation in the Web of Science, I found that the terms co-occurred in <2% of the analyzed entries (titles, abstracts, and keywords) from 2000 to 2020. This result is indicative of the rather peripheral attention that, more broadly, landscape-shaping processes seem to receive in the conservation literature. Among conservation scientists and practitioners, landforms that define the physical structure of habitat are often perceived as largely static, whereas the consideration of their dynamic adjustments to geomorphic processes is often limited to extreme events. I use examples derived from river-floodplain environments to illustrate strong, multifaceted, and reciprocal interactions between biota and various erosional and depositional processes. These ubiquitous interdependencies clearly demonstrate that geomorphic processes are an integral part of ecosystem dynamics at time scales relevant for conservation. Crucially, erosional and depositional processes modulate many environmental impacts of past and current anthropogenic activities. I conclude that the absence of a more explicit and widespread consideration of geomorphic processes in conservation science and practice is surprising and detrimental to their effectiveness. I call for bolstered efforts among the conservation and geoscience communities to better integrate landscape dynamics within the field of conservation. The rise of the ecosystem-based and social-ecological systems approaches to conservation and the growth of interdisciplinary geoscience branches (e.g., biogeomorphology, ecohydraulics, and geoconservation) will facilitate such an integration.

Un caso para una mayor integración de los procesos paisajísticos físicos en las ciencias y prácticas de la conservación Resumen En este artículo sostengo que la naturaleza dinámica de los procesos paisajísticos (geomórficos) contemporáneos merecen ser mejor considerados en las ciencias y práctica de la conservación. Con el análisis de una muestra de términos fundamentales de Web of Science relacionados con la geomorfología y la conservación basada en el área, encontré que los términos tuvieron una coocurrencia en <2% de las entradas analizadas (títulos, resúmenes y palabras clave) entre el 2000 y 2020. Este resultado indica que hay una atención relativamente periférica que, en términos más generales, parece que reciben los procesos paisajísticos dentro de la literatura de la conservación. Los científicos y practicantes de la conservación con frecuencia perciben el relieve que define la estructura física del hábitat como estático, mientras que la consideración de sus ajustes dinámicos a los procesos geomórficos está casi siempre limitado a eventos extremos. En las llanuras aluviales existen interacciones fuertes, multifacéticas y recíprocas entre la biota y varios procesos de erosión y deposición. Estas interdependencias predominantes demuestran con claridad que los procesos geomórficos son una parte integral de las dinámicas ambientales en escalas de tiempo relevantes para la conservación. Es destacable que los procesos de erosión y deposición modulan muchos impactos ambientales del pasado y actividades antropogénicas actuales. Concluyo que la ausencia de una consideración más explícita y extendida de los procesos geomórficos dentro de las ciencias y práctica de la conservación es sorprendente y nociva para su efectividad. Hago un llamado para fortalecer esfuerzos dentro de las comunidades de conservación y geociencias para integrar de mejor manera las dinámicas del paisaje dentro del campo de conservación. El incremento en las estrategias basadas en ecosistemas y sistemas socio­ecológicos en la conservación y el aumento de ramas interdisciplinarias de las geociencias (p. ej.: biogeomorfología, ecohidráulica y geoconservación) facilitarán dicha integración.

Interdecadal variation in sediment yield from a forested mountain basin: The role of hydroclimatic variability, anthropogenic disturbances, and geomorphic connectivity.

Variation in sediment yield may reflect a signal of disturbances in the upstream landscape, modified by sediment routing. This study, conducted in a forested drainage basin in the inland Pacific Northwest, USA, sought to generate a better insight into the interdecadal variability of sediment yield in mountain landscapes in response to environmental change during the last century. To this end, we examined: (1) sediment yield fluctuations; and (2) their association with streamflow and land use changes; as well as (3) streamflow links to climate variability modes; and (4) the influence of sediment delivery from hillslope sources to streams (lateral connectivity) and its downstream routing through the stream network (longitudinal connectivity) on land use signal at the basin's outlet. Sediment yield between 1910 and 2017, estimated based on reconstructed fluvial delta growth, displayed an order of magnitude variability, which indicates a substantial geomorphic sensitivity. The interpretation of temporal patterns and an exploratory statistical analysis pointed to land use-related sediment supply changes as the primary driver of these fluctuations, dominating system behavior before changes in environmental regulations and practices in the mid-1970s. Hydroclimatically controlled streamflow variability appeared to be more prominent in the subsequent period. Our connectivity analysis suggested that a considerable portion of coarse sediment mobilized by harvest and road construction may still reside within the channel network. In light of previous research in this landscape system, we speculate that, despite limited anthropogenic pressures in the recent decades, its characteristics and behavior continue to be conditioned by land use legacies. Overall, this study contributes to the growing understanding of profound anthropogenic transformation of the earth surface. Specifically, it demonstrates that historical resource extraction may have left a lasting imprint even in relatively remote mountain landscapes. Given the ongoing rapid environmental change, such understanding is crucial for watershed management, conservation, and restoration.