Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Med. intensiva (Madr., Ed. impr.) ; 45(5): 298-312, Junio - Julio 2021. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-222311

RESUMO

El soporte respiratorio no invasivo (SRNI) comprende 2 modalidades de tratamiento, la ventilación mecá-nica no invasiva (VMNI) y la terapia de alto flujo con cánulas nasales (TAFCN) que se aplican en pacientes adultos, pediátricos y neonatales con insuficiencia respiratoria aguda (IRA). Sin embargo, el grado de acuerdo entre las distintas especialidades sobre el beneficio de estas técnicas en diferentes escenarios clínicos es controvertido. El objetivo del presente consenso fue elaborar una serie de recomendaciones de buena práctica clínica para la aplicación de soporte no invasivo en pacientes con IRA, avaladas por todas las sociedades científicas involucradas en el manejo del paciente adulto y pediátrico/neonatal con IRA. Para ello se contactó con las diferentes sociedades implicadas, quienes designaron a su vez a un grupo de 26 profesionales con suficiente experiencia en su aplicación. Se realizaron 3 reuniones presenciales para consensuar las recomendaciones (hasta un total de 71) fundamentadas en la revisión de la literatura y en la actualización de la evidencia disponible en relación con 3 categorías: indicaciones, monitorización yseguimiento del SRNI. Finalmente, se procedió a votación telemática de cada una de las recomendaciones, por parte de los expertos de cada sociedad científica implicada. Para la clasificación del grado de acuerdo se optó por un sistema analógico de clasificación fácil e intuitivo de usar, y que expresara con claridad si el procedimiento relacionado con el SRNI debía hacerse, podía hacerse o no debía hacerse. (AU)


Non-invasive respiratory support (NIRS) in adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) comprises two treatment modalities, non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy. However, experts from different specialties disagree on the benefit of these techniques in different clinical settings. The objective of this consensus was to develop a series of good clinical practice recommendations for the application of non-invasive support in patients with ARF, endorsed by all scientific societies involved in the management of adult and pediatric/neonatal patients with ARF. To this end, the different societies involved were contacted, and they in turn appointed a group of 26 professionals with sufficient experience in the use of these techniques. Three face-to-face meetings were held to agree on recommendations (up to a total of 71) based on a literature review and the latest evidence associated with 3 categories: indications, monitoring and follow-up of NIRS. Finally, the experts from each scientific society involved voted telematically on each of the recommendations. To classify the degree of agreement, an analogue classification system was chosen that was easy and intuitive to use and that clearly stated whether the each NIRS intervention should be applied, could be applied, or should not be applied. (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Adulto , Ventilação não Invasiva , Insuficiência Respiratória , Cânula , Consenso
2.
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed) ; 45(5): 298-312, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34059220

RESUMO

Non-invasive respiratory support (NIRS) in adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) comprises two treatment modalities, non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy. However, experts from different specialties disagree on the benefit of these techniques in different clinical settings. The objective of this consensus was to develop a series of good clinical practice recommendations for the application of non-invasive support in patients with ARF, endorsed by all scientific societies involved in the management of adult and pediatric/neonatal patients with ARF. To this end, the different societies involved were contacted, and they in turn appointed a group of 26 professionals with sufficient experience in the use of these techniques. Three face-to-face meetings were held to agree on recommendations (up to a total of 71) based on a literature review and the latest evidence associated with 3 categories: indications, monitoring and follow-up of NIRS. Finally, the experts from each scientific society involved voted telematically on each of the recommendations. To classify the degree of agreement, an analogue classification system was chosen that was easy and intuitive to use and that clearly stated whether the each NIRS intervention should be applied, could be applied, or should not be applied.


Assuntos
Ventilação não Invasiva , Insuficiência Respiratória , Adulto , Cânula , Criança , Consenso , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Oxigênio , Piruvatos , Insuficiência Respiratória/terapia , Sociedades Científicas
3.
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed) ; 45(5): 298-312, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33309463

RESUMO

Non-invasive respiratory support (NIRS) in adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) comprises two treatment modalities, non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy. However, experts from different specialties disagree on the benefit of these techniques in different clinical settings. The objective of this consensus was to develop a series of good clinical practice recommendations for the application of non-invasive support in patients with ARF, endorsed by all scientific societies involved in the management of adult and pediatric/neonatal patients with ARF. To this end, the different societies involved were contacted, and they in turn appointed a group of 26 professionals with sufficient experience in the use of these techniques. Three face-to-face meetings were held to agree on recommendations (up to a total of 71) based on a literature review and the latest evidence associated with 3 categories: indications, monitoring and follow-up of NIRS. Finally, the experts from each scientific society involved voted telematically on each of the recommendations. To classify the degree of agreement, an analogue classification system was chosen that was easy and intuitive to use and that clearly stated whether the each NIRS intervention should be applied, could be applied, or should not be applied.

4.
Arch. bronconeumol. (Ed. impr.) ; 56(supl.2): 261-270, jul. 2020. ilus, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-192469

RESUMO

La enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) es una infección del tracto respiratorio causada por un nuevo coronavirus emergente que se reconoció por primera vez en Wuhan, China, en diciembre de 2019. Actualmente la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) ha definido la infección como pandemia y existe una situación de emergencia sanitaria y social para el manejo de esta nueva infección. Mientras que la mayoría de las personas con COVID-19 desarrollan solo una enfermedad leve o no complicada, aproximadamente el 14% desarrollan una enfermedad grave que requiere hospitalización y oxígeno, y el 5% pueden requerir ingreso en una Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos. En casos severos, COVID-19 puede complicarse por el síndrome de dificultad respiratoria aguda (SDRA), sepsis y shock séptico y fracaso multiorgánico. Este documento de consenso se ha preparado sobre directrices basadas en evidencia desarrolladas por un panel multidisciplinario de profesionales médicos de cuatro sociedades científicas españolas (Sociedad Española de Medicina Intensiva y Unidades Coronarias [SEMICYUC], Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica [SEPAR], Sociedad Española de Urgencias y Emergencias [SEMES], Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor [SEDAR]) con experiencia en el manejo clínico de pacientes con COVID-19 y otras infecciones virales, incluido el SARS, así como en sepsis y SDRA. El documento proporciona recomendaciones clínicas para el soporte respiratorio no invasivo (ventilación no invasiva, oxigenoterapia de alto flujo con cánula nasal) en cualquier paciente con presentación sospechada o confirmada de COVID-19 con insuficiencia respiratoria aguda. Esta guía de consenso debe servir como base para una atención optimizada y garantizar la mejor posibilidad de supervivencia, así como permitir una comparación fiable de las futuras intervenciones terapéuticas de investigación que formen parte de futuros estudios observacionales o de ensayos clínicos


Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a respiratory tract infection caused by a newly emergent coronavirus, that was first recognized in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. Currently, the World Health Organization (WHO) has defined the infection as a global pandemic and there is a health and social emergency for the management of this new infection. While most people with COVID-19 develop only mild or uncomplicated illness, approximately 14% develop severe disease that requires hospitalization and oxygen support, and 5% require admission to an intensive care unit. In severe cases, COVID-19 can be complicated by the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis and septic shock, and multiorgan failure. This consensus document has been prepared on evidence-informed guidelines developed by a multidisciplinary panel of health care providers from four Spanish scientific societies (Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine [SEMICYUC], Spanish Society of Pulmonologists [SEPAR], Spanish Society of Emergency [SEMES], Spanish Society of Anesthesiology, Reanimation, and Pain [SEDAR]) with experience in the clinical management of patients with COVID-19 and other viral infections, including SARS, as well as sepsis and ARDS. The document provides clinical recommendations for the noninvasive respiratory support (noninvasive ventilation, high flow oxygen therapy with nasal cannula) in any patient with suspected or confirmed presentation of COVID-19 with acute respiratory failure. This consensus guidance should serve as a foundation for optimized supportive care to ensure the best possible chance for survival and to allow for reliable comparison of investigational therapeutic interventions as part of randomized controlled trials


Assuntos
Humanos , Adulto , Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Coronavírus Relacionado à Síndrome Respiratória Aguda Grave/patogenicidade , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Ventilação não Invasiva/métodos , Síndrome Respiratória Aguda Grave/terapia , Consenso , Padrões de Prática Médica , Pandemias , Administração por Inalação , Administração Intranasal/métodos , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/métodos
5.
Rev. esp. anestesiol. reanim ; 67(5): 261-270, mayo 2020. ilus, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-187650

RESUMO

La enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) es una infección del tracto respiratorio causada por un nuevo coronavirus emergente que se reconoció por primera vez en Wuhan, China, en diciembre de 2019. Actualmente la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) ha definido la infección como pandemia y existe una situación de emergencia sanitaria y social para el manejo de esta nueva infección. Mientras que la mayoría de las personas con COVID-19 desarrollan solo una enfermedad leve o no complicada, aproximadamente el 14% desarrollan una enfermedad grave que requiere hospitalización y oxígeno, y el 5% pueden requerir ingreso en una Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos. En casos severos, COVID-19 puede complicarse por el síndrome de dificultad respiratoria aguda (SDRA), sepsis y shock séptico y fracaso multiorgánico. Este documento de consenso se ha preparado sobre directrices basadas en evidencia desarrolladas por un panel multidisciplinario de profesionales médicos de cuatro sociedades científicas españolas (Sociedad Española de Medicina Intensiva y Unidades Coronarias [SEMICYUC], Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica [SEPAR], Sociedad Española de Urgencias y Emergencias [SEMES], Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor [SEDAR]) con experiencia en el manejo clínico de pacientes con COVID-19 y otras infecciones virales, incluido el SARS, así como en sepsis y SDRA. El documento proporciona recomendaciones clínicas para el soporte respiratorio no invasivo (ventilación no invasiva, oxigenoterapia de alto flujo con cánula nasal) en cualquier paciente con presentación sospechada o confirmada de COVID-19 con insuficiencia respiratoria aguda. Esta guía de consenso debe servir como base para una atención optimizada y garantizar la mejor posibilidad de supervivencia, así como permitir una comparación fiable de las futuras intervenciones terapéuticas de investigación que formen parte de futuros estudios observacionales o de ensayos clínicos


Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a respiratory tract infection caused by a newly emergent coronavirus, that was first recognized in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. Currently, the World Health Organization (WHO) has defined the infection as a global pandemic and there is a health and social emergency for the management of this new infection. While most people with COVID-19 develop only mild or uncomplicated illness, approximately 14% develop severe disease that requires hospitalization and oxygen support, and 5% require admission to an intensive care unit. In severe cases, COVID-19 can be complicated by the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis and septic shock, and multiorgan failure. This consensus document has been prepared on evidence-informed guidelines developed by a multidisciplinary panel of health care providers from four Spanish scientific societies (Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine [SEMICYUC], Spanish Society of Pulmonologists [SEPAR], Spanish Society of Emergency [SEMES], Spanish Society of Anesthesiology, Reanimation, and Pain [SEDAR]) with experience in the clinical management of patients with COVID-19 and other viral infections, including SARS, as well as sepsis and ARDS. The document provides clinical recommendations for the noninvasive respiratory support (noninvasive ventilation, high flow oxygen therapy with nasal cannula) in any patient with suspected or confirmed presentation of COVID-19 with acute respiratory failure. This consensus guidance should serve as a foundation for optimized supportive care to ensure the best possible chance for survival and to allow for reliable comparison of investigational therapeutic interventions as part of randomized controlled trials


Assuntos
Humanos , Adulto , Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Coronavírus Relacionado à Síndrome Respiratória Aguda Grave/patogenicidade , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Ventilação não Invasiva/métodos , Síndrome Respiratória Aguda Grave/terapia , Consenso , Padrões de Prática Médica , Pandemias , Administração por Inalação , Administração Intranasal/métodos , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/métodos
6.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed) ; 67(5): 261-270, 2020 May.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32307151

RESUMO

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a respiratory tract infection caused by a newly emergent coronavirus, that was first recognized in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. Currently, the World Health Organization (WHO) has defined the infection as a global pandemic and there is a health and social emergency for the management of this new infection. While most people with COVID-19 develop only mild or uncomplicated illness, approximately 14% develop severe disease that requires hospitalization and oxygen support, and 5% require admission to an intensive care unit. In severe cases, COVID-19 can be complicated by the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis and septic shock, and multiorgan failure. This consensus document has been prepared on evidence-informed guidelines developed by a multidisciplinary panel of health care providers from four Spanish scientific societies (Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine [SEMICYUC], Spanish Society of Pulmonologists [SEPAR], Spanish Society of Emergency [SEMES], Spanish Society of Anesthesiology, Reanimation, and Pain [SEDAR]) with experience in the clinical management of patients with COVID-19 and other viral infections, including SARS, as well as sepsis and ARDS. The document provides clinical recommendations for the noninvasive respiratory support (noninvasive ventilation, high flow oxygen therapy with nasal cannula) in any patient with suspected or confirmed presentation of COVID-19 with acute respiratory failure. This consensus guidance should serve as a foundation for optimized supportive care to ensure the best possible chance for survival and to allow for reliable comparison of investigational therapeutic interventions as part of randomized controlled trials.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Ventilação não Invasiva/métodos , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/diagnóstico , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Consenso , Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Humanos , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/complicações , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/etiologia , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Rev. clín. esp. (Ed. impr.) ; 217(9): 522-525, dic. 2017. tab, graf
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-169078

RESUMO

Objetivos. Averiguar la correlación entre la presión arterial de oxígeno (PaO2) y la saturación de la oxihemoglobina por pulsioximetría (SpO2) en pacientes que acuden a Urgencias con sospecha de insuficiencia respiratoria aguda. Material y métodos. Estudio prospectivo, observacional y multicéntrico realizado en los servicios de Urgencias de 3 hospitales españoles. Resultados. Se incluyeron 166 pacientes, que presentaron unos valores medios±desviación estándar de PaO2, SpO2 y fracción inspiratoria de O2 (FiO2) de 61,64±17,3mmHg, 87,61±8,8% y 0,28±0,15%, respectivamente. La mediana de los cocientes PaO2/FiO2 y SpO2/FiO2 fue de 256,6 y 359,2, respectivamente. La correlación entre la PaO2/FiO2 y la SpO2/FiO2 fue de 0,745 (p<0,001). Conclusiones. La SpO2/FiO2 se puede utilizar como estimación de la PaO2/FiO2 y conocer el estado de oxigenación del paciente con insuficiencia respiratoria aguda (AU)


Objectives. To ascertain the correlation between the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) and oxyhaemoglobin saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2) in patients who were admitted to the emergency department with suspected acute respiratory failure. Material and methods. A prospective, observational multicentre study was conducted in the emergency departments of 3 Spanish hospitals. Results. The study included 166 patients who presented mean±standard deviation PaO2, SpO2 and fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) values of 61.64±17.3mmHg, 87.61±8.8% and 0.28±0.15%, respectively. The median PaO2/FiO2 and SpO2/FiO2 ratios were 256.6 and 359.2, respectively. The correlation between PaO2/FiO2 and the SpO2/FiO2 was 0.745 (P<.001). Conclusions. The SpO2/FiO2 ratio can be used to calculate PaO2/FiO2 and determine the oxygenation state of patients with acute respiratory failure (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Oxiemoglobinas/análise , Oximetria/métodos , Insuficiência Respiratória/fisiopatologia , Gasometria/métodos , Doença Aguda , Estudos Prospectivos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Tratamento de Emergência/métodos , Testes de Função Respiratória/métodos
8.
Rev Clin Esp (Barc) ; 217(9): 522-525, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29032960

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To ascertain the correlation between the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) and oxyhaemoglobin saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2) in patients who were admitted to the emergency department with suspected acute respiratory failure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective, observational multicentre study was conducted in the emergency departments of 3 Spanish hospitals. RESULTS: The study included 166 patients who presented mean±standard deviation PaO2, SpO2 and fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) values of 61.64±17.3mmHg, 87.61±8.8% and 0.28±0.15%, respectively. The median PaO2/FiO2 and SpO2/FiO2 ratios were 256.6 and 359.2, respectively. The correlation between PaO2/FiO2 and the SpO2/FiO2 was 0.745 (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: The SpO2/FiO2 ratio can be used to calculate PaO2/FiO2 and determine the oxygenation state of patients with acute respiratory failure.

9.
Emergencias (St. Vicenç dels Horts) ; 23(2): 93-98, abr. 2011. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-94166

RESUMO

Objetivo: Describir las características de los pacientes reatendidos en las primeras 72 horas por cólico renoureteral (CR) en el servicio de urgencias (SUH). Método: Estudio epidemiológico unicéntrico descriptivo mediante revisión de historias de pacientes con CR atendidos el año 2009. Se comparó el grupo de readmitidos en las 72 horas siguientes frente a aquéllos que no volvieron a consultar. Se estudiaron los datos demográficos, los antecedentes de CR, el método diagnóstico y el tratamiento. Resultados: Se realizaron 1.386 asistencias a 1.256 pacientes: 1.150 (91,6%) enfermos consultaron en una ocasión, mientras 106 (8,4%) realizaron al menos 2 consultas (total:236 asistencias). Los varones presentaron una mayor frecuencia de reconsulta (OR 3,14;IC 95% 1,92-5,17; p < 0,001). Como también se observó en los pacientes con antecedentes con urolitiais el 57,54% reconsultaron (OR 1,89; IC 95% 1,24-2,89; p = 0,0017).Se realizaron 756 (65,7%) radiografías simples en primera visita y 57 (53,8%) en reconsultas(OR 0,61; IC 95% 0,40-0,93; p < 0,001). Se realizó ecografía abdominal inicial a155 (13,4%) pacientes y en visitas posteriores a 29 (27,5%) (OR 2,18; IC 95% 1,50-3,16; p < 0,001). La analgesia incluyó más frecuentemente dexketoprofeno (OR 1,44; IC95% 1,05-1,96; p = 0,016). En readmitidos se empleó más tramadol (OR 1,75; IC 95%1,05-2,88; p = 0,002) y benzodiacepinas (OR 2,01; IC 95% 1,32-3,07; p < 0,001).Conclusiones: Las reconsultas por CR es elevado, mayoritariamente varones y con antecedentes de CR. La ecografía se reservó para pacientes con dolor persistente. El uso de dexketoprofeno resultó beneficioso. Los escalones terapéuticos de analgesia estuvieron presentes al prescribir tramadol como analgésico y las benzodiacepinas como adyuvantes y fueron fármacos eficaces (AU)


Objective: To describe the characteristics of patients seeking retreatment for renal or ureteral colic within 72 hours of afirst visit to the emergency department. Material and methods: Descriptive single center epidemiologic study based on records for patients with nephritic colictreated in the emergency department of Hospital General Reina Sofía in Murcia, Spain, in 2009. Data for patients who were readmitted to the emergency department were compared with data for patients who did not return. We studied demographic variables, history of emergency visits, diagnostic workup, and treatment. Results: A total of 1386 emergency department visits for nephritic colic by 1256 patients were studied; 1150 (91.56%) patients came to the emergency department once and 106 (8.44%) sought emergency care at least twice (236 visits). Men revisited more frequently than women (odds ratio [OR], 3.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.92-5.17; P<.001). As well as those patients with a history of urinary tract stones, 57.54% came more than once to the emergency room(OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.24-2.89; P=.0017). Plain radiographs were ordered during 756 (65.7%) first visits and 57 (53.8%)subsequent visits (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40-0.93; P<.001). Abdominal sonograms were done on the first visits of 155(13.4%) patients and on 29 (27.45%) subsequent visits (OR, 2.18, 95% CI, 1.5-3.16; P<.001). Analgesics prescribed included dexketoprofen (OR, 1.44, 95% CI, 105.1-96; P=.016). On subsequent visits to the emergency department tramadol (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.05-2.88; P=.002) and benzodiazepines (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.32-3.07; P<.001) were prescribed more often. Conclusions: The number of emergency department visits for nephritic colic is high; most patients are men with a (..) (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Recidiva/prevenção & controle , Cálculos Renais/epidemiologia , Cólica/tratamento farmacológico , Tratamento de Emergência/métodos , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...