Minimization of spreading of SARS-CoV-2 via household waste produced by subjects affected by COVID-19 or in quarantine.

Currently available evidence supports that the predominant route of human-to-human transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 is through respiratory droplets. Indirect hands contact with surfaces contaminated by infectious droplets subsequently touching the mouth, nose or eyes seems to be another route of an indirect contact transmission. Persistence of the virus on different surfaces and other materials has been reported in recent studies: SARS-CoV-2 was more stable on plastic and stainless steel than on copper and cardboard. Viable virus was detected up to 72 h after application to different surfaces, although infectivity decay was also observed. This evidence suggests the likelihood that waste generated from patients affected by COVID-19 or subjects in quarantine treated in private houses or in areas different from hospitals and medical centres could be contaminated by SARS-CoV-2. Consequently, waste streams may represent a route for viral spreading being a potential risk also for the operators directly involved in the different phases of waste management. To address this concern, a specific multidisciplinary working group was settled by the Italian National Institute of Health (ISS) during the COVID-19 emergency, in order to establish guidelines related to solid waste collection, delivering, withdrawal, transport, treatment and disposal. Temporary stop of waste sorting, instructions for the population on how to package waste, instructions for Companies and operators for the adoption of adequate personal protection equipment (PPE), the use and sanitation of proper vehicles were among the main recommendations provided to the community by publications of freely downloadable reports and infographics in layman language. Incineration, sterilization and properly managed landfills were identified as the facilities to be preferentially adopted for the treatment of this kind of waste, considering the main inactivation strategies of SARS-CoV-2 (e.g. treatment length > 9 days and temperature > 70 °C for more than 5 min).

Spontaneous splenic rupture in patient with metastatic melanoma treated with vemurafenib.

BACKGROUND: BRAF inhibitors such as vemurafenib are a new family of biological drugs, recently available to treat metastatic malignant melanoma. METHODS: We present the case of a 38-year-old man affected by metastatic melanoma who had been under treatment with vemurafenib for a few days. The patient suffered from sudden onset of abdominal pain due to intra-abdominal hemorrhage with profuse hemoperitoneum. An emergency abdominal sonography confirmed the clinical suspicion of a splenic rupture. RESULTS: The intraoperative finding was hemoperitoneum due to splenic two-step rupture and splenectomy was therefore performed. Histopathology confirmed splenic hematoma and capsule laceration, in the absence of metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: This report describes the occurrence of a previously unreported adverse event in a patient with stage IV melanoma receiving vemurafenib.

The single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography: a new procedure to perform the sentinel node biopsy in patients with head and neck melanoma.

The aim of this study was to define and validate a new technique to detect the sentinel node (SN) in patients treated for head and neck melanoma. In a small series of 23 head and neck melanoma patients, lymphatic mapping was followed by SN biopsy, using in 12 patients a new diagnostic imaging technique, single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography. The procedure is described and the major problems encountered are discussed. The preliminary data show that identification of SN using single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography never failed in 12 patients, and biopsies performed, compared with those in a standard group, took significantly less time (Mann-Whitney test P=0.006). In conclusion, the authors underline the possibility of a wide use for this technique.

Preliminary study on radioguided sentinel node identification in colon cancer.

The purpose of this study was to prove the prognostic value of the sentinel node (SN) in colon tumors, and to validate radioguided surgery in identifying the SN. Nodal metastases are a strong prognostic factor in patients operated on for colon or rectal cancer, decreasing the 5-year survival rate by approximately 20 per cent and dropping it to 30 per cent. Unfortunately, of 50 per cent of patients judged to be nodal disease-free at surgery, about 20 to 30 per cent will die from a local tumor relapse or distant metastases within 5 years of diagnosis. These data suggest that other steps are needed for more precise staging of patients, and specifically, to accurately harvest and study the nodes on which to base the prognosis. Mapping lymph nodes predictive of the whole basin status, referred to as SN, may help focus the pathologist's attention on a small but representative target, and achieve correct nodal harvesting, which includes atypical drainage pathways, when present. Twenty selected patients with colon tumor were administered a subserosal, peritumoral, intraoperative injection of blue dye and 99mTc-marked colloidal particles. The SN was identified visually and with a handheld gamma probe and was subsequently stitch-labeled. The operation was then conducted after standard surgical procedures, and the required lymphadenectomy was performed. Later, the probe was used to confirm radioactivity in the excised specimen and the absence of radioactivity in the operative field after resection; the purpose of the latter was to exclude the presence of aberrant routes of lymphatic drainage. The labeled SN were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and, in case of negative findings, cytokeratin immunostaining was performed. The remaining resected nodes were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The probe identification of SN was 95 per cent overall (19/20); in 13 patients, a single SN was labeled, and two were labeled in six patients, harvesting 25 SN. In the 19 patients in whom a radioemitting SN was labeled, we recorded only one false-negative; in one case, a micrometastasis in the SN was the only extracolonic site. The blue dye identified the SN in 14 cases; in some of them, the number of nodes was overestimated (five single, seven double, and two triple SN) in comparison with the radioisotope, but at least one of the dyed nodes was also radioemitting. SN identification in colon cancers is a safe, fast, and easy procedure for ultrastaging the nodal basin. The technique involves a relatively flat learning curve and could become standard care for identifying the presence of nodal micrometastases at a low cost, thereby also making it affordable at small health centers.