Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Spine Surg ; 29(4): E182-7, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24136048

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To determine the short-term clinical succesrate of the M6-C cervical disk prosthesis in primary and secondary surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA) provides an alternative to anterior cervical decompression and fusion for the treatment of spondylotic radiculopathy or myelopathy. The prevention of adjacent segment disease (ASD), a possible complication of anterior cervical decompression and fusion, is its most cited--although unproven--benefit. Unlike older arthroplasty devices that rely on a ball-and-socket-type design, the M6-C cervical disk prosthesis represents a new generation of unconstrained implants, developed to achieve better restoration of natural segmental biomechanics. This device should therefore optimize clinical performance of CDA and reduce ASD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients had preoperative computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging and postoperative x-rays. Clinical outcome was assessed using the Neck Disability Index, a Visual Analog Scale, and the SF-36 questionnaire. Patients were asked about overall satisfaction and whether they would have the surgery again. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were evaluated 17.1 months after surgery, on average. Nine patients had a history of cervical interventions. Results for Neck Disability Index, Visual Analog Scale, and SF-36 were significantly better among patients who had undergone primary surgery. In this group, 87.5% of patients reported a good or excellent result and 91.7% would have the procedure again. In contrast, all 4 device-related complications occurred in the small group of patients who had secondary surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The M6-C prosthesis appears to be a valuable addition to the CDA armatorium. It generates very good results in patients undergoing primary surgery, although its use in secondary surgery should be avoided. Longer follow-up is needed to determine to what measure this device can prevent ASD.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Substituição/métodos , Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Disco Intervertebral/cirurgia , Prótese Articular , Espondilose/cirurgia , Adulto , Discotomia/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Desenho de Prótese , Radiculopatia/etiologia , Radiculopatia/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doenças da Medula Espinal/etiologia , Doenças da Medula Espinal/cirurgia , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/etiologia , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/prevenção & controle , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Espondilose/complicações
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...