Current Controversies in Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy for Barrett's Esophagus.

OPINION STATEMENT: Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the most important risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Through the sequence of no dysplasia to low-grade dysplasia (LGD) and high-grade dysplasia (HGD), eventually early cancer (EC) may develop. The risk of neoplastic progression is relatively low, 0.5-0.9 % per patient per year. However, once diagnosed, esophageal adenocarcinoma is often irresectable, and 5-year survival is only 15 %. Therefore, non-dysplastic BE patients are kept under endoscopic surveillance to detect early neoplasia in a curable stage. In case of LGD confirmed by an expert pathologist, risk of neoplastic progression is high. In these confirmed LGD patients, prophylactic ablation using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the Barrett's segment has proven to significantly reduce risk of neoplastic progression. Once patients are diagnosed with HGD or EC, they have a clear indication for endoscopic treatment. The cornerstone for endoscopic management of early Barrett's neoplasia is endoscopic resection of mucosal abnormalities. Endoscopic resection (ER) provides a large tissue specimen for accurate histological evaluation to select those patients for further endoscopic management, who have neoplasia limited to the mucosa, well to moderately differentiated and without lymph-vascular invasion. After ER, the remainder of the Barrett's mucosa can be eradicated with RFA, to prevent occurrence of metachronous lesions.

Does EUS-FNA molecular analysis carry additional value when compared to cytology in the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasm? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasonography with fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has become an integral tool in the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) and the analysis of molecular/DNA abnormalities might improve the accuracy of pre-operative diagnosis. A review was conducted of all studies using EUS-FNA aspirates of PCLs to assess the accuracy and added benefit that molecular analysis provides to cytological analysis. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PRISMA guidelines and electronic databases: PubMed/SCOPUS/EMBASE/Cochrane/CINAHL. Surgical pathology was used as the definitive reference standard. The QUADAS-2 tool was used for quality assessment. RESULTS: In total, 162 articles were identified; 12 articles met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Ten studies reported on cytology and 8 studies reported k-ras mutational analysis. 362 patients (of 1115 total) had surgical pathology available. The sensitivity and specificity of cytology was 0.42 and 0.99; the sensitivity and specificity of k-ras was 0.39 and 0.95; and the sensitivity and specificity of the combined test of cytology and k-ras was 0.71 and 0.88, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: k-ras mutational analysis used as an individual screening test has a poor diagnostic accuracy, as does cytology when used alone. The benefit comes with utilization in a combined fashion. More studies are needed to evaluate the correct sequence and utility of these tests for cyst differentiation.

Surgical treatment of locally advanced anal cancer after male-to-female sex reassignment surgery.

We present a case of a transsexual patient who underwent a partial pelvectomy and genital reconstruction for anal cancer after chemoradiation. This is the first case in literature reporting on the occurrence of anal cancer after male-to-female sex reassignment surgery. We describe the surgical approach presenting our technique to avoid postoperative complications and preserve the sexual reassignment.