RESUMO
Background: A cardiac hibernoma is a rare phenomenon, with just a handful of reports in the literature. They are difficult to characterize with conventional imaging including echocardiography, computed tomography (CT), cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), or positron emission tomography (PET). Their definitive diagnosis relies primarily on histopathology via either endovascular or surgical biopsy. Previous case reports have entailed surgical excision followed by histopathology; however, surgery may be unfavourable in some patients with increased perioperative risk. Case summary: We present the case of a 57-year-old woman who was referred to our cardiology service with an interatrial lipomatous mass found incidentally on chest CT for assessment of rib fractures. She had 6 months of unexplained syncope, which was attributed to superior vena cava (SVC) compression demonstrated by chest CT. The mass had benign characteristics on echocardiography, CT, and CMR but was glucose-avid on PET, which indicated a possible malignancy such as liposarcoma. Her comorbid and very significant airways disease precluded her from surgical excision, so instead, endovascular biopsy was performed. Histopathology showed brown fat which was negative for mouse double minute 2 amplification on fluorescence in situ hybridisation testing; hence, a diagnosis was made of hibernoma, a rare benign tumour of brown fat. Given the benign diagnosis and her surgical risk with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a multidisciplinary recommendation was made favouring conservative management, with careful ongoing follow-up and the consideration of SVC stenting if symptoms progressed. Discussion: The definitive diagnosis of a cardiac hibernoma is complex and relies heavily on histopathology due to the contradictory findings on chest imaging. Careful consideration of management within a multidisciplinary team setting is essential to achieve a successful outcome.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: End stage heart failure is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, and its prevalence is expected to rise with the ageing population. For suitable patients, orthotopic heart transplantation remains the gold standard therapy, however, a paucity of donor organs has led to the development of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). These devices can be utilized as either a bridge-to-transplant (BTT) or as an alternative to heart transplantation. While these devices can prolong life and improve quality of life, they are associated with a significant number of adverse events. We aim to systematically review the literature to quantify survival and the incidence of adverse events following implantation of continuous-flow LVADs (cf-LVAD). METHODS: A systematic review was performed to determine outcomes following implantation of a cf-LVAD. Primary outcomes were survival and frequency of adverse events (such as bleeding, infection, thrombosis, stroke and right ventricular failure). Secondary outcomes included quality of life and assessment of functional status. RESULTS: Sixty-three studies reported clinical outcomes of 9,280 patients. Survival after cf-LVAD varied between studies. Industry-funded trials generally reported better overall survival than the single- and multi-center case series, which showed significant variation. The largest registry report documented twelve, twenty-four and forty-eight-month survival rates of 82%, 72% and 57% respectively. The most commonly reported adverse events were gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), device-related infection, neurological events and right heart failure (RHF). Bleeding, RHF and infection were the most frequent complications experienced by those supported with cf-LVAD, occurring in up to 35%, 40% and 55% of patients, respectively. Quality of life as measured using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and functional status as measured with the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) improved after cf-LVAD implantation with no decline evident two years after implantation. CONCLUSIONS: The paucity of donor hearts has led to the development of left-ventricular assist devices as a BTT or as a destination therapy (DT). Outcomes after cf-LVAD implantation are excellent, with short-term survival comparable to heart transplantation, but long-term survival remains limited due to the incidence of post-implantation adverse events. Despite these complications, quality of life and functional status improve significantly post-implantation and remain improved over the long-term. This study demonstrates the potential benefits of cf-LVAD therapy whilst also identifying adverse events as an area of increased morbidity and mortality.
