Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Adv Clin Exp Med ; 32(8): 921-931, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36753376

RESUMO

Three-dimensional bioprinting technology appears to be a promising solution for the treatment and reconstruction of a wide range of maxillofacial bone defects. In this review, the authors discuss different bioprinting solutions and options in the context of the 4 factors of bone healing: structures or scaffolds, osteogenic cells, growth factors, and stabilization (diamond concept of healing), as well as the influence of a 5th factor - vascularization. Bone is a complex tissue; hence, bone bioprinting may require different technical approaches and mixed methods. Ultraviolet (UV) crosslinkable hydrogels, such as gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA), are among the most promising bioinks; they are enhanced by hydroxyapatite or 1-2.5 mm beta-tricalcium phosphate (ß-TCP) granules and porous scaffolds with recommended pore sizes greater than 300 µm. The advantages of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are their significant availability, low tumorigenicity, and great potential for differentiation into osteoblasts or endothelial cells (ECs). Although growth factors require advanced delivery systems, they provide excellent improvement in the functionality of printed tissues. A proper vasculature system supplies cells with oxygen and nutrients, removes waste products, promotes osteogenesis, prevents ischemic necrosis, and improves the mechanical properties of bone. With all of these aspects perfectly balanced and working in synergy, the clinical use of bioprinting is only a matter of time.


Assuntos
Bioimpressão , Engenharia Tecidual , Engenharia Tecidual/métodos , Bioimpressão/métodos , Células Endoteliais , Osso e Ossos , Odontologia , Alicerces Teciduais/química , Impressão Tridimensional
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...