The Eye as the Window to the Heart: Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Biomarkers as Indicators of Cardiovascular Disease.

Alterations in microvasculature represent some of the earliest pathological processes across a wide variety of human diseases. In many organs, however, inaccessibility and difficulty in directly imaging tissues prevent the assessment of microvascular changes, thereby significantly limiting their translation into improved patient care. The eye provides a unique solution by allowing for the non-invasive and direct visualization and quantification of many aspects of the human microvasculature, including biomarkers for structure, function, hemodynamics, and metabolism. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) studies have specifically identified reduced capillary densities at the level of the retina in several eye diseases including glaucoma. This narrative review examines the published data related to OCTA-assessed microvasculature biomarkers and major systemic cardiovascular disease. While loss of capillaries is being established in various ocular disease, pilot data suggest that changes in the retinal microvasculature, especially within the macula, may also reflect small vessel damage occurring in other organs resulting from cardiovascular disease. Current evidence suggests retinal microvascular biomarkers as potential indicators of major systemic cardiovascular diseases, including systemic arterial hypertension, atherosclerotic disease, and congestive heart failure.

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Antagonists: Promising Players in the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treatment has been revolutionized by the introduction of vascular endothelial growth factor antagonists (anti-VEGF), but the need for frequent intravitreal injections poses a heavy burden to patients and physicians. Evolving anti-VEGF therapies include longer duration agents, approaches that target multiple pathways, topical anti-VEGF agents, sustained-release, and genetic therapies. Abicipar pegol, a designed ankyrin repeat protein (DARPin), demonstrated the ability to maintain stable visual acuity with 12-week dosing, but was not approved by the FDA due to higher than usual rates of intraocular inflammation. Conbercept, a recombinant anti-VEGF fusion protein, has been approved in China, and is in Phase 3 trials globally. KSI-301 is an anti-VEGF antibody biopolymer conjugate that allowed 66% of nAMD patients to maintain at least a 6-month treatment-free interval in Phase 1b studies. OPT-302, an inhibitor of VEGF-C/D, will be tested in phase 3 studies that compare anti-VEGF-A monotherapy against combination therapy with OPT-302. Faricimab is a bispecific anti-VEGF/Ang-2 antibody that upregulates the Tie-2 signaling pathway and promotes vascular stability; it is undergoing phase 3 trials with potential for 12- or 16-week dosing. PAN-90806 is a topical anti-VEGF agent that showed the ability to reduce injection frequency by 79% compared to ranibizumab monotherapy in a phase 1/2a trial. Sustained-release anti-VEGF therapies include the ranibizumab Port Delivery System (in phase 3 studies), GB-102 (Phase 2b), OTX-TKI (phase 1), and Durasert (preclinical). Suprachoroidal delivery of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor, axitinib, is in preclinical studies. Genetic therapies in phase 1 studies include RGX-314 and ADVM-022, which introduce a viral vector that modifies the retina's cellular apparatus to create an anti-VEGF biofactory, potentially serving as a one-time treatment. Further investigation is warranted for drugs and delivery systems that hope to advance visual outcomes and reduce treatment burden of nAMD.

Circadian Rhythm and Glaucoma: What do We Know?

PURPOSE: The current understanding of circadian regulation disorders and their involvement in glaucoma pathophysiology are poorly understood, yet they may have a substantial impact on the onset and progression of glaucoma. Herein, we review and summarize all the available literature on circadian rhythm disorder and glaucoma to uncover the impact on glaucoma risk, and we highlight future research and potential novel targets for glaucoma management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of the relevant literature was performed through PubMed through August 1, 2019. RESULTS: Within a normal circadian rhythm, intraocular pressure (IOP) peaks at night, whereas blood pressure (BP) troughs at night. High nocturnal IOP coupled with low nocturnal systemic BP results in low ocular perfusion pressure and potential for unobserved damage to retinal tissues and the optic nerve. Circadian-related melatonin and sleep disorders also result in changes in IOP and ocular perfusion pressure that lead to the progression of glaucoma. In addition, impaired perception of light input due to glaucoma can subsequently lead to abnormal serum levels of melatonin, resulting in circadian rhythm misalignment. This disruption of the circadian rhythm also contributes to sleep and mood disorders, common in individuals with glaucoma. As regards treatment, glaucoma medications that lower nocturnal IOP without influencing nocturnal BP or diminishing circadian variation seem most effective. CONCLUSIONS: Glaucoma progression is influenced by multiple physiological factors regulated by the circadian rhythm. Progression of the disease may also cause physiological changes that lead to circadian-related issues. Further research is warranted on the diurnal cycle, melatonin-mediated processes, and their influence on glaucoma management.

EFFICACY OF DEXAMETHASONE INTRAVITREAL IMPLANT FOR REFRACTORY MACULAR EDEMA CAUSED BY RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION.

PURPOSE: To investigate efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal (DEX) implant in treating refractory macular edema caused by retinal vein occlusion. METHODS: Retrospective chart review. RESULTS: Twenty-two eyes with refractory macular edema caused by retinal vein occlusion were treated with a mean of 2.2 DEX over 12 months. Patient had previously received a mean of 7 treatments (laser, bevacizumab, and/or triamcinolone) for macular edema present for at least 4 months duration (mean 20.8 ± 17.6 months, range 4-72 months) before starting DEX. Mean baseline visual acuity was 20/91, and mean central subfield thickness was 506 µm. DEX improved mean best-corrected visual acuity to 20/75 and 20/66 at 7 weeks and 6 months follow-up, although it worsened to 20/132 at 12 months. Mean central subfield thickness improved to 292, 352, and 356 µm at 7 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up, respectively. There was a statistically significant association between number of DEX treatments and central subfield thickness (P = 3.28 × 10). There was a statistically significant association between number of days followed and best-corrected visual acuity (P = 0.006). Six of 12 (50%) phakic patients developed visually significant cataract requiring surgery. Five of 22 (23%) patients developed ocular hypertension (intraocular pressure > 30) and consequently did not undergo further treatment with DEX. CONCLUSION: DEX resulted in sustained anatomical reduction of retinal vein occlusion-associated refractory macular edema, although this did not translate into long-term best-corrected visual acuity improvement in either phakic or pseudophakic patients, possibly related to chronic structural alterations in the retina despite reduction of edema.

RANIBIZUMAB FOR DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA REFRACTORY TO MULTIPLE PRIOR TREATMENTS.

PURPOSE: Diabetic macular edema can be refractory to multiple treatment modalities. Although there have been anecdotal reports of ranibizumab showing efficacy when other modalities provided limited benefit, little has been published on treatment for refractory diabetic macular edema. This study sought to investigate this observation further. METHODS: Retrospective chart review. RESULTS: Thirty-three eyes of 22 patients with refractory diabetic macular edema were treated with 0.3 mg intravitreal ranibizumab. This group of eyes received an average of 5.1 prior treatments (macular laser, intravitreal bevacizumab, triamcinolone acetonide, or dexamethasone implant). The mean best corrected visual acuity before the initial ranibizumab injection was 20/110 and the mean central subfield thickness was 384 µm. After 7 visits over an average of 48 weeks, during which an average of 6 ranibizumab injections were administered, the mean visual acuity improved to 20/90 and the mean central subfield thickness improved to 335 µm. Both central subfield thickness and best corrected visual acuity improved with number of days of follow-up in a statistically significant fashion (P < 0.01). Similarly, both central subfield thickness and visual acuity improved with number of ranibizumab injections in a linear fashion, but this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Ranibizumab can improve diabetic macular edema refractory to prior treatments of laser photocoagulation, intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide, and bevacizumab.