Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 22(1): E11-9, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25837328

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Public health climate change adaptation planning is an urgent priority requiring stakeholder feedback. The 10 Essential Public Health Services can be applied to adaptation activities. OBJECTIVE: To develop a state health department climate and health adaptation plan as informed by stakeholder feedback. DESIGN: With Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funding, the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) implemented a 2010-2013 climate and health planning process, including 7 surveys on perceptions and adaptation priorities. PARTICIPANTS: New York State Department of Health program managers participated in initial (n = 41, denominator unknown) and follow-up (72.2%) needs assessments. Surveillance system information was collected from 98.1% of surveillance system managers. For adaptation prioritization surveys, participants included 75.4% of NYSDOH leaders; 60.3% of local health departments (LHDs); and 53.7% of other stakeholders representing environmental, governmental, health, community, policy, academic, and business organizations. Interviews were also completed with 38.9% of other stakeholders. RESULTS: In 2011 surveys, 34.1% of state health program directors believed that climate change would impact their program priorities. However, 84.6% of state health surveillance system managers provided ideas for using databases for climate and health monitoring/surveillance. In 2012 surveys, 46.5% of state health leaders agreed they had sufficient information about climate and health compared to 17.1% of LHDs (P = .0046) and 40.9% of other stakeholders (nonsignificant difference). Significantly fewer (P < .0001) LHDs (22.9%) were incorporating or considering incorporating climate and health into planning compared to state health leaders (55.8%) and other stakeholders (68.2%). Stakeholder groups agreed on the 4 highest priority adaptation categories including core public health activities such as surveillance, coordination/collaboration, education, and policy development. CONCLUSIONS: Feedback from diverse stakeholders was utilized by NYSDOH to develop its Climate and Health Strategic Map in 2013. The CDC Building Resilience Against Climate Effects (BRACE) framework and funding provides a collaborative model for state climate and health adaptation planning.


Assuntos
Pessoal Administrativo , Mudança Climática , Retroalimentação , Planejamento em Saúde , Saúde Pública , Saúde Ambiental , Humanos , New York , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos
2.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep ; 6(2): 138-45, 2012 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22700022

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This project evaluated New York (NY) hospitals outside of New York City (upstate) for their awareness and utilization of the NY State Department of Health Pediatric and Obstetric Emergency Preparedness Toolkit (toolkit) and presence of pediatric emergency preparedness planning elements. METHODS: A survey assessing toolkit awareness and utilization was distributed to all 145 upstate NY hospitals. Quantitative survey data were analyzed using summary statistics, χ(2) analysis, and odds ratios (OR) in aggregate, by hospital size, and by presence of pediatric medicine/surgery, pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), and/or neonatal ICU (NICU) beds (pediatric beds). RESULTS: Of the 145 hospitals, 116 (80%) completed the survey; 86% of these had reviewed the toolkit. Most had staff clinicians with pediatric expertise, but fewer had appointed pediatric clinical (physician or nurse) coordinators. Hospitals with at least one pediatric bed were more than 2.5 times more likely to have an emergency management plan (EMP) for pediatric patients (P = .0223) and nearly 8 times more likely to have appointed a pediatric physician coordinator (P < .0001) than were hospitals without pediatric beds. Appointment of a pediatric clinical coordinator was significantly associated (P < .001) with presence of various pediatric emergency plan elements (OR range: 3.06-15.13), while staff pediatric clinical expertise or toolkit review were not. CONCLUSIONS: Appointment of at least one pediatric clinical coordinator and the presence of one or more pediatric beds were significantly associated with having developed key EMP pediatric elements. Further research should examine barriers to pediatric clinical coordinator appointment and explore the awareness that pediatric patients may arrive at nonpediatric hospitals during a disaster with no option for transfer.


Assuntos
Conscientização , Planejamento em Desastres/estatística & dados numéricos , Administração Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Pediatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Planejamento em Desastres/organização & administração , Diretrizes para o Planejamento em Saúde , Número de Leitos em Hospital/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , New York , Razão de Chances , Pediatria/organização & administração , Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de Saúde
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...