Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Patients with Massive Rotator Cuff Tears or Cuff Tear Arthropathies at a Minimum Follow-up of 7 Years.

Purpose: To evaluate indications and factors that influence long-term clinical outcomes and revision rates for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in shoulders with irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (mRCTs) or cuff tear arthropathies (CTAs). Methods: The authors retrospectively evaluated a consecutive series of shoulders with no fracture sequelae that underwent primary RSA between 2011 and 2013. Independent observers collected demographic data, surgical techniques, and implant types, as well as primary outcome measures such as American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) score and Constant score (CS). Study design: Case series, level IV. Results: From the initial series of 123 patients that underwent RSA, 29 patients died (24%) for reasons unrelated to the shoulder arthroplasty, 11 were lost to follow-up (9%), and 4 required revision surgery (3%). The final cohort of 79 patients comprised 55 women (70%), and 24 men (30%), aged 72.7 ± 7.0. At a final follow-up of 8.9 ± 0.6 years (range: 7.4-10.3) the absolute CS was 59.0 ± 16.2, the age-/sex-adjusted CS was 76.6 ± 41.2, and ASES was 77.1 ± 20.3. Univariable analysis revealed no associations for absolute CS, but revealed that age-/sex-adjusted CS was significantly lower for patients with high blood pressure (ß = -15.8, p = .025). Conclusions: At a minimum follow-up of 7.4 years, the absolute CS was 59.0 ± 16.2, the age-/sex-adjusted CS was 87.4 ± 24.1 and ASES was 77.1 ± 20.3. When stratifying the outcomes of RSA by indication, there were no significant differences in patients with mRCTs versus CTA in terms of absolute CS, age-/sex-adjusted CS, and ASES. Univariable analysis revealed no association with absolute and age-/sex-adjusted CS for type of indication or surgical approach.

Cementless anatomical prosthesis for the treatment of 3-part and 4-part proximal humerus fractures: cadaver study and prospective clinical study with minimum 2 years followup.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional and radiological outcomes of a cementless, trauma-specific locked stem for 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study consisted of two parts: a cadaver study with 22 shoulders and a multicenter prospective clinical study of 23 fracture patients evaluated at least 2 years after treatment. In the cadaver study, the locked stem (Humelock(TM), FX Solutions) and its instrumentation were evaluated. In the clinical study, five senior surgeons at four different hospitals performed the surgical procedures. An independent surgeon evaluated the patients using clinical (Constant score, QuickDASH) and radiological (X-rays, CT scans) outcome measures. RESULTS: The cadaver study allowed us to validate the height landmarks relative to the pectoralis major tendon. In the clinical study, at the review, abduction was 95° (60-160), forward flexion was 108° (70-160), external rotation (elbow at body) was 34° (0-55), the QuickDASH was 31 (4.5-59), the overall Constant score was 54 (27-75), and the weighted Constant score was 76 (31.5-109). DISCUSSION: This preliminary study of hemiarthroplasty (HA) with a locked stem found results that were at least equivalent to published series. As all patients had at least a 2-year follow-up, integration of the locked stem did not cause any specific complications. These results suggest that it is possible to avoid using cement when hemiarthroplasty is performed for the humeral stem. This implant makes height adjustment and transosseous suturing of the tuberosities more reproducible.