Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 95(2): 131-3, 2013 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23484996

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is established in many procedures but not in bariatric surgery. One explanation may be that SILS is technically demanding in morbidly obese patients. This report describes our technique and experience with single incision laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (SILAGB). METHODS: Prospective data collection was performed on consecutive obese patients who underwent SILAGB between November 2009 and February 2011. A single 3 cm transverse incision in the right upper quadrant was used for a Covidien SILS™ multichannel access port. The technique is described with a standard pars flaccida approach and the 'tips and tricks' needed for a wide range of candidates using standard laparoscopic equipment. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients (27 female) with a median body mass index of 41 kg/m(2) (range: 35-52 kg/m(2)) and median age of 44 years (range: 22-57 years) underwent SILAGB. There were no 'conversions' to a standard laparoscopic technique. Two cases required the addition of one single 5 mm port. The only complications were two postoperative wound infections (one with a port site infection requiring replacement of the port) and one faulty band requiring replacement. There were therefore two returns to theatre and no 30-day deaths. All patients were discharged on the first postoperative day. In this series, operative times reduced significantly to be comparable with the conventional laparoscopic approach. CONCLUSIONS: SILAGB is safe and feasible in the morbidly obese. Proficiency in this technique using conventional laparoscopic equipment can be achieved with a short learning curve.


Assuntos
Gastroplastia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Adulto , Falha de Equipamento , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Curva de Aprendizado , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Adulto Jovem
2.
Br J Surg ; 96(11): 1300-7, 2009 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19847875

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) has been proposed as an alternative therapy for selected patients with oesophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes of dCRT, surgery alone, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery (CS) in patients with oesophageal cancer. METHODS: Consecutive patients diagnosed with oesophageal cancer and managed by a multidisciplinary team were staged by computed tomography and endoluminal ultrasonography. Those deemed unsuitable for surgery on the grounds of performance status, bulky local disease or personal choice received dCRT. The primary outcome measure was overall survival measured from date of diagnosis. RESULTS: Of 417 patients, 173 received dCRT, 126 underwent surgery alone and 118 received CS. The incidence of grade III/IV toxicity after dCRT and CS was 39.3 and 60.2 per cent respectively. Operative morbidity rates were 42.9 and 44.4 per cent after surgery alone and CS respectively. Thirty-day mortality rates were zero, 7.9 and 0.8 per cent after dCRT, surgery alone and CS respectively. Overall 2-year survival rates were 44.3, 56.2 and 42.4 per cent (P = 0.422). CONCLUSION: These findings support the need for a randomized trial of dCRT versus CS for resectable oesophageal cancer.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/mortalidade , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidade , Esofagectomia/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Radioterapia Adjuvante/mortalidade , Análise de Sobrevida , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
3.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 90(6): 467-71, 2008 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18765024

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine whether one specialist unit could manage all patients diagnosed with oesophagogastric cancer in Gwent and Cardiff and Vale NHS Trusts over a 6-month period with regard to workload, resource and training opportunities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients diagnosed with oesophagogastric (OG) cancer in Gwent and Cardiff and Vale NHS Trusts and referred to the regional South East Wales Upper GI multidisciplinary team over the 6-month period from 1 July to 31 December 2005 were studied prospectively and compared with the previous 6-month caseload at Cardiff and Vale. RESULTS: Out-patient workload increased from 160 new (33 OG cancers) and 533 follow-up patients (161 OG cancers) between 1 January and 30 June 2005, to 290 new (68 OG cancers, 106% increase) and 865 follow-up patients (230 OG cancers, 43% increase) between 1 July, and 31 December 2005. The number of patients undergoing radical surgery increased from 14 to 23 (D2 gastrectomy 8 versus 13; oesophagectomy 6 versus 10). Cancer-related workload in the latter period generated 118 intermediate equivalents (IEs) of operative work for two specialist surgeons and one SpR occupying 38% of the total time available on 104 scheduled operating lists, compared with 64 IEs in the previous 6 months, representing an 84% increase in cancer-related operative training opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: Centralisation of oesophagogastric cancer surgery is feasible and desirable if national guidelines are to be satisfied, and this strategy has significant positive implications for surgical training and audit.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Carga de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Consultores , Cuidados Críticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Auditoria Médica , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , País de Gales
4.
Br J Surg ; 94(12): 1509-14, 2007 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17902093

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy are common neoadjuvant treatments for resectable T3 N0-1 M0 oesophageal carcinoma. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of these therapies in consecutive cohorts of patients. METHODS: Between January 1998 and December 2001, 88 patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (two cycles of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), prior to 45 Gy in 25 F concurrent radiotherapy with cisplatin and 5-FU). From 2002, 117 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (76 patients had two cycles of cisplatin and 41 had four cycles of epirubicin, cisplatin and 5-FU). The primary outcome measure was survival, and analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS: Postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were 56 per cent (40 patients) and 10 per cent (seven patients) respectively in the chemoradiotherapy group, compared with 47 per cent (46 patients) and 1 per cent (one patient) in the chemotherapy group (P = 0.008). The cumulative 5-year survival rate by intention to treat was 35 per cent after chemoradiotherapy versus 21 per cent after chemotherapy (P = 0.188). The cumulative corrected 5-year survival rate after completed treatment was 44 per cent for chemoradiotherapy compared with 25 per cent for chemotherapy (P = 0.032). CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy should remain an option for patients with satisfactory performance status.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Estudos de Coortes , Epirubicina/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Esofágicas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Dis Esophagus ; 20(3): 225-31, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17509119

RESUMO

Transthoracic esophagectomy (TT) has been championed as a better cancer operation than transhiatal esophagectomy (TH) because the approach facilitates meticulous wide tumor excision and lymphadenectomy. However, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRTS) and chemotherapy (CS) have been reported to improve outcomes, and we aimed to compare outcomes after multimodal therapy related to the operative approach. One hundred and fifty-one consecutive patients were studied prospectively. All patients were staged with computed tomography and endoluminal ultrasound, and treatment decisions were related to stage and performance status. One hundred and nineteen TT (median age 58 years, 92 male, 54 CRTS, 65 CS) were performed compared to 32 TH (median age 57 year, 27 male, 14 CRTS, 18 CS). Primary outcome measure was survival. Post-operative morbidity and mortality were 54% and 4%, respectively, after TT compared with 59% and 6% after TH (chi2 0.239 df 1, P=0.625). Recurrent cancer was no less frequent after TT (52%) than after TH (37.5%, chi2 2.151 df=1, P=0.142). Cumulative uncorrected 5-year survival was 34% after TT compared with 53% after TH (log rank 1.44, df=1, P=0.2298). Median survival was also similar in lymph node positive patients (TT vs. TH, 23 months vs. 22 months, respectively, log rank 0.25, df=1, P=0.6199). Despite the fact that patients receiving multimodal therapy and a TH esophagectomy were less fit, operative morbidity, mortality and recurrence were similar, and survival did not differ significantly when compared with multimodal TT esophagectomy.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Esofagectomia/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Estudos Prospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Surgeon ; 5(1): 58-9, 2007 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17313131

RESUMO

We report a patient in whom the diagnoses of the syndrome of inappropriate anti-diuretic hormone secretion (SIADH) and gastric carcinoma were made concurrently. After a gastrectomy, there was resolution of the electrolyte disturbances. This represents the third reported case of this association in the English language literature.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/complicações , Síndrome de Secreção Inadequada de HAD/etiologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/complicações , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Idoso , Biópsia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Seguimentos , Gastrectomia/métodos , Gastroscopia , Humanos , Síndrome de Secreção Inadequada de HAD/diagnóstico , Masculino , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
7.
Dis Esophagus ; 20(1): 29-35, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17227307

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to determine the role of body mass index (BMI) in a Western population on outcomes after esophagectomy for cancer. Two hundred and fifteen consecutive patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer of any cell type were studied prospectively. Patients with BMIs > 25 kg/m were classified as overweight and compared with control patients with BMIs below these reference values. Ninety-seven patients (45%) had low or normal BMIs, 86 patients (40%) were overweight, and a further 32 (15%) were obese. High BMIs were associated with a higher incidence of adenocarcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma (83%vs. 14%, P = 0.041). Operative morbidity and mortality were 53% and 3% in overweight patients compared with 49% (P = 0.489) and 8% (P = 0.123) in control patients. Cumulative survival at 5 years was 27% for overweight patients compared with 38% for control patients (P = 0.6896). In a multivariate analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.492, 95% CI 1.143-1.948, P = 0.003), T-stage (HR 1.459, 95% CI 1.028-2.071, P = 0.034), N-stage (HR 1.815, 95% CI 1.039-3.172, P = 0.036) and the number of lymph node metastases (HR 1.008, 95% CI 1.023-1.158, P = 0.008), were significantly and independently associated with durations of survival. High BMIs were not associated with increased operative risk, and long-term outcomes were similar after R0 esophagectomy.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Índice de Massa Corporal , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidade , Esofagectomia , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Terapia Combinada , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Prognóstico , Análise de Sobrevida
8.
Br J Surg ; 90(10): 1220-4, 2003 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14515290

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) offers very accurate tumour and node staging information for oesophagogastric cancer. The aim was to determine whether the addition of EUS directly influenced the definitive management plan for individual patients. METHODS: Personal and staging information from 100 consecutive patients with carcinoma of the oesophagus or oesophagogastric junction were summarized and blinded. Three consultant oesophagogastric surgeons independently made a management decision for each patient, in the presence and absence of the EUS data. All scored their perceived value of the EUS staging data for each patient. RESULTS: EUS was deemed useful in 63-87 per cent of patients and its addition resulted in an increased number of concordant management plans (from 53 to 62 per cent), and increased agreement between surgeons. The greatest change in concordant management was an increased referral of patients for non-surgical palliation. CONCLUSION: The addition of EUS to the staging of patients with oesophageal and oesophagogastric junction cancer significantly altered the management strategy for some of these patients.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico por imagem , Endossonografia/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/patologia , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Tomada de Decisões , Método Duplo-Cego , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Junção Esofagogástrica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/métodos , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Radioterapia Adjuvante
9.
J Clin Pathol ; 56(3): 205-8, 2003 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12610100

RESUMO

AIMS: To determine the value of squamous mucosal histology in the assessment of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms. METHODS: Sixty six patients with reflux symptoms underwent endoscopy with oesophageal biopsy, manometry, and 24 hour oesophageal pH testing. The following histological features were assessed in squamous mucosa: the degree of basal cell hyperplasia, the degree of papillary zone elongation, and the density of neutrophil and eosinophil infiltration. Comparisons were made between the histological findings and the oesophageal function tests. RESULTS: The correlation between the traditionally accepted histological markers of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in squamous mucosa and 24 hour pH testing was predominantly negative, with the exception of neutrophil inflammation in the squamous mucosa of patients with complicated reflux disease. CONCLUSIONS: This study was unable to confirm the value of the Ismail-Beigi criteria as histological markers of acid reflux. By inference, biopsy of the oesophageal squamous mucosa is of limited value in the assessment of patients with reflux symptoms.


Assuntos
Refluxo Gastroesofágico/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biópsia , Esofagite/metabolismo , Esofagite/patologia , Esofagoscopia , Feminino , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/metabolismo , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Hiperplasia/patologia , Masculino , Manometria , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Monitorização Ambulatorial/métodos , Mucosa/patologia , Infiltração de Neutrófilos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...