A Review of OIE Country Status Recovery Using Vaccinate-to-Live Versus Vaccinate-to-Die Foot-and-Mouth Disease Response Policies II: Waiting Periods After Emergency Vaccination in FMD Free Countries.

For countries with OIE status, FMD free country where vaccination is not practised, vaccinate-to-live policies have a significant economic disincentive as the trade restriction waiting period is double that of vaccinate-to-die policies. The disposal of healthy vaccinated animals strictly for the purpose of regaining markets with debatable scientific justification is a global concern. The feasibility of aligning the waiting periods to facilitate vaccinate-to-live is explored. The first article of this two-part review (Barnett et al., 2015) explored the qualities of higher potency Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD) vaccines, performance of differentiating infected from vaccinated animals (DIVA) diagnostic assays particularly in vaccinates and carriers, as well as aspects of current limitations of post-outbreak surveillance. Here, the history behind the OIE waiting periods for FMD free status is reviewed as well as whether the risk of vaccinated animals and their subsequent products differ appreciably at 3 versus 6 months. It is concluded that alignment is feasible for vaccinate-to-live using higher potency FMD vaccines within the current OIE waiting period framework of 3 and 6 months blocks of time. These waiting periods reflect precedence, historical practicalities and considered expert opinion rather than a specific scientific rationale. The future lies in updated epidemiological and diagnostic technology to establish an acceptable level of statistical certainty for surveillance or target probability of freedom of FMDV (infection or circulation) not time restricted waiting periods. The OIE Terrestrial Code limits trade from a FMD free country where vaccination is not practiced to animal products and live non-vaccinated animals. The risk of FMDV in products derived from higher potency vaccinated animals is appreciably less than for countries with infected FMD status or even from a FMD free country where vaccination is practised for which the Code has Articles with guidelines for safe trade with time restrictions of 3 months or less. All these presume that key requirements in the implementation of emergency vaccination including appropriate vaccine match, vaccine application, susceptible population coverage, etc. are addressed.

New and existing pharmacotherapeutic options for persistent asthma and COPD.

Asthma and COPD are chronic inflammatory airway disorders with systemic manifestations. The two diseases have different airway inflammation, features of airway remodelling with subsequent pathophysiology and clinical presentation. The international management guidelines recommend stepwise pharmacotherapy depending on disease control and÷or disease stage, comprising relievers and overall uniform controller treatment, despite the heterogeneity across the conditions and treatment response. Despite effective medications per se, still too many patients remain uncontrolled and no treatment can definitely cure either of the conditions. This overview includes currently recommended pharmacotherapeutic options with novel and future treatment targets.

Elevated expression of adenosine A1 receptor in bronchial biopsy specimens from asthmatic subjects.

Asthmatics, unlike healthy subjects, experience bronchoconstriction in response to inhaled adenosine, and extracellular adenosine concentrations are elevated in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and exhaled breath condensate of asthmatic subjects. However, little is known about the location and expression of adenosine receptors in asthmatic airways. The aim of the present study was to investigate the distribution of adenosine A(1) receptors in bronchial biopsy specimens from mildly asthmatic steroid-naïve subjects and then compare the degree of expression with that of healthy subjects. Biopsy sections were immunostained using an adenosine A(1) receptor antibody, the selectivity of which was validated in specific experiments. Image analysis was then performed in order to determine differences in immunostaining intensity. Immunostaining of biopsy sections from the asthmatic subjects revealed strong expression of the A(1) receptor, located predominantly in the bronchial epithelium and bronchial smooth muscle. In comparison, very weak immunostaining was observed in biopsy specimens obtained from healthy subjects. Image analysis revealed that the intensity of positive staining of the asthmatic bronchial epithelium and smooth muscle regions was significantly greater than that observed for the healthy epithelium and smooth muscle. In conclusion, the sensitivity of asthmatics to inhaled adenosine coupled with increased adenosine A(1) receptor expression implies that these receptors play a role in the pathophysiology of this disease.