The association between food access and frailty among older adults with gastrointestinal malignancies-The CARE Registry.

BACKGROUND: Food access is associated with higher gastrointestinal (GI) cancer mortality; however, its association with frailty, which is a predictor of premature mortality among older adults with cancer, is less understood. METHODS: The authors included 880 adults aged 60 years and older who were recently diagnosed with GI cancers and were undergoing self-reported geriatric assessment at their first prechemotherapy visit to the University of Alabama at Birmingham oncology clinic. Food access was measured using the 2019 US Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service designation low-income, low-access (LILA), classifying census tracts based on income and/or access to food stores at various distances. The primary outcome was frailty on the CARE (Cancer and Aging Resilience Evaluation) Frailty Index, a composite of the proportion of impaired geriatric assessment measures. The authors examined the LILA-frailty association with modified Poisson regression accounting for census-tract clustering. RESULTS: The median patient age was 69 years, 58.1% were men, 22.5% were non-Hispanic Black, 29.2% had colorectal cancer, 28.0% had pancreatic cancer, 70.1% presented with stage III/IV disease, and 34.9% were frail. A higher proportion in LILA areas were non-Hispanic Black (44.1% vs. 10.8%; p < .001) and had less education (high school or less: 48.1% vs. 37.9%; p = .020). Adjusting for age, race and ethnicity, sex, cancer type and stage, and education, an LILA designation was associated with 58% greater odds of worsening frailty status (95% confidence interval, 1.18-2.12). An analysis of LILA subcategories revealed that associations were maintained across all LILA measures. CONCLUSIONS: Poor food access was associated with a greater risk of frailty among newly diagnosed older adults with GI cancers before they received systemic treatment. Intervening on local food access, particularly in LILA areas, may be a target for improving rates of frailty and promoting health equity in this population.

Association of emotional support with quality of life, mental health, and survival in older adults with gastrointestinal malignancies-Results from the CARE registry.

BACKGROUND: Emotional support (ES) is the most frequently reported support need among older adults with cancer. Yet, the association of ES with cancer outcomes is largely unknown. This study examined the association of ES with health-related quality of life (HRQoL), mental health, and survival among older adults with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. METHODS: We included newly diagnosed older adults (≥60 years) with GI cancer undergoing self-reported geriatric assessment at their first clinic visit. ES was measured using an adaptation of the Medical Outcomes Study (dichotomized adequate ES vs. inadequate ES). Outcomes included physical and mental HRQoL, anxiety, depression, and survival. Multivariable linear regression evaluated the association between ES and HRQoL scores. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the association of ES with anxiety and depression. All models were adjusted for age at geriatric assessments, race, sex, and cancer type/stage. RESULTS: 795 participants were included. Median patient age was 68 years (IQR: 64-74), 58% were male, and most cancers were either colorectal (37.9%) or pancreatic (30.8%). Most (77.6%) had adequate ES. Patients with inadequate ES were more likely to be Black (31.5 vs. 20.8%, p = 0.005), disabled (24.1 vs. 10.4%, p < 0.001), widowed/divorced (54.2 vs. 24.8%, p < 0.001) and had lower physical and mental HRQoL t-scores (Physical ß: -3.35, 95% CI: -5.25, -1.46; Mental ß: -2.46, 95% CI: -4.11, -0.81) and higher odds of depression (aOR: 2.22, CI: 1.34-3.69). This study found no difference between those with adequate ES versus inadequate ES in the proportion of deaths within 1 year of diagnosis (24.3% vs. 24.2%, p = 0.966), or within 2 years of diagnosis (32.4% vs. 33.2%, p = 0.126). CONCLUSIONS: Older adults with inadequate ES have worse physical and mental HRQoL and higher odds of depression compared to those with adequate ES.

Glycemic Control and Awareness of Insulin Therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Glycemic control is associated with better health outcomes among patients with diabetes. No previous research has examined the relationship between knowledge of one's insulin dose and glycemic control. This study sought to determine if patients who accurately recalled their insulin dose achieved better glycemic control than patients who could not remember their dose. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with 106 patients. Data were collected during patients' appointments at two endocrinology clinics in Wichita, Kansas from May 29, 2018 to February 15, 2019. Adequate glycemic control was defined as an HbA1c of less than 7.5%. A multiple logistic regression model was developed to identify factors associated with glycemic control. RESULTS: Of the 109 patients asked to participate, 105 agreed to participate in the study. About half (45%, n = 48) were male. Patients' mean age was 50 years (SD = 17). Seventy-seven percent (n = 81) were overweight (body mass index (BMI) of 25 to 29.9) or obese (BMI >30). Patients who correctly stated their insulin dose had a mean Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of 6.9% (SD = 0.98), whereas those who incorrectly stated their dose had a mean HbA1c of 9.5% (SD = 1.9; p <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant relationship between knowledge of one's insulin dose and adequate glycemic control.