Neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy treated with hypothermia: Observations in a large Canadian population and determinants of death and/or brain injury.

BACKGROUND: Birth asphyxia in term neonates remains a serious condition that causes significant mortality and long-term neurodevelopmental sequelae despite hypothermia treatment. The objective of this study was to review therapeutic hypothermia practices in a large population of neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) across Canada and to identify determinants of adverse outcome. METHODS: Our retrospective observational cohort study examined neonates≥36 weeks, admitted to the Canadian Neonatal Network NICUs between 2010 and 2014, diagnosed with HIE, and treated with hypothermia. Adverse outcome was defined as death and/or brain injury. Maternal, birth, and postnatal characteristics were compared between neonates with adverse outcome and those without. The association between the variables which were significantly different (p < 0.05) between the two groups and adverse outcome were further tested, while adjusting for gestational age, birth weight, gender, and initial severity of encephalopathy. RESULTS: A total of 2187 neonates were admitted for HIE; 52% were treated with hypothermia and 40% developed adverse outcome. Initial severity of encephalopathy (moderate, p = 0.006; severe, p < 0.0001), hypotension treated with inotropes (p = 0.001), and renal failure (p = 0.007) were significantly associated with an increased risk of death and/or brain injury. CONCLUSIONS: In asphyxiated neonates treated with hypothermia, not only their initial severity of encephalopathy on admission, but also their cardiac and renal complications during the first days after birth were significantly associated with risk of death and/or brain injury. Careful monitoring and cautious management of these complications is warranted.

Effect of prophylactic indomethacin administration and early feeding on spontaneous intestinal perforation in extremely low-birth-weight infants.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of concomitant administration of prophylactic indomethacin and early enteral feeds on the risk of spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) in extremely low-birth-weight (ELBW) infants, and to describe the variation in prophylactic indomethacin use in Canada. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of 4268 ELBW infants born at <30 weeks' gestation admitted to Canadian neonatal units between 2010 and 2014 was conducted. Prophylactic indomethacin (I+ or I-, administered within 24 h) and early feeding (E+ or E-, initiated in the first 2 days) exposures were studied concurrently and independently. The primary outcomes were SIP and death before discharge. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: Compared with the I-/E+ reference group (n=1829), infants in I+/E+ (n=285; aOR 2.92, 95% CI 1.41 to 6.08) and I+/E- (n=213; aOR 2.84, 95% CI 1.35 to 5.98) groups had higher odds of SIP, whereas those in the I-/E- group had similar odds (n=1941; aOR 1.37, 95% CI 0.88 to 2.14). Odds of SIP were higher in the indomethacin exposed group (I+) compared with the unexposed (I-) group when controlled for early feeding (aOR 2.43, 95% CI 1.41 to 4.19), but not in the early feeding group when controlled for indomethacin. The use of prophylactic indomethacin ranged from 0% usage in 13 sites to 78% use in one site. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic indomethacin was associated with increased odds of SIP independently from early feeding in this cohort; however, early enteral feeding was not associated with SIP. Marked variation in the use of prophylactic indomethacin was identified.