A pilot study to evaluate the impact of digital imaging on the delivery of oral hygiene instruction.

AIMS: To determine whether personalised Oral Hygiene Advice (OHA) using an intra-oral-camera (IOC) combined with standard OHA as provided in general dental practice reduces plaque levels after 4 weeks more than the provision of standard OHA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 22 healthy adult participants diagnosed with gingivitis took part in this pilot parallel-designed, randomised, examiner-blind, 2x-treatment, study regarding their home-care oral hygiene habits and attitudes to oral health. An IOC-image was taken and plaque, gingival and bleeding scores were recorded. Test group participants received standard OHA with IOC-images to indicate areas for improvement, control group participants received standard OHA. Questionnaires and plaque, gingival and bleeding scores were repeated after 4 weeks. Plaque was scored from the IOC-images and scores compared to clinical plaque scores. RESULTS: Lifestyle habits, attitudes to oral health, plaque (0.63vs0.61, control vs test) and bleeding scores (1.17vs0.96, control vs test) were similar at baseline. After 4-weeks, plaque scores improved more in test as compared to control group (39.4vs20.6%, p<0.05, while gingival and bleeding scores approached significance. There was no difference in lifestyle habits between groups, but the test group reported significantly greater confidence in adhering to their bespoke oral health plan. Agreement between the clinical and IOC plaque scores was good. CONCLUSIONS: Use of IOC further personalises the prevailing standard of oral hygiene advice and generates great patient engagement with pictorial reports to facilitate a more in-depth patient explanation of their gingival health, resulting in significant plaque reduction and improved gingival health compared to the standard OHA alone.

Randomised controlled trial demonstrating the impact of behaviour change intervention provided by dental professionals to improve gingival health.

AIMS: To determine impact of oral hygiene behaviour change intervention compared to the prevailing standard of oral hygiene advice provided in general dental practice, on bleeding on probing (BOP) in gingivitis patients, over 3-months. The effect of providing power-brushes was also evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: NHS dental practices were cluster-randomised to intervention or control (2:1). Dentists at intervention sites received behaviour modification training. Participants were stratified to high (≥20% BOP) or low (<20% BOP) presence of gingivitis and a subset assigned a power-brush. BOP and plaque scores were assessed at baseline and 3-months. RESULTS: A total of 538 participants (369:169; intervention: control) completed the study. BOP reduced in both gingivitis groups with significantly greater reduction in intervention compared to control group (BOP:38% vs 19%, p = 0.0236); Borderline significance favouring the intervention was demonstrated for the low gingivitis group (BOP:37% vs 15%, p = 0.0523). A highly significant reduction in BOP (intervention vs control) was demonstrated for volunteers who swapped from manual to power-brush (44% vs 37%, p = 0.0039). Plaque score improved more in control than intervention group (Plaque:37% vs 44%, p = 0.00215). CONCLUSIONS: Behaviour change techniques were readily mastered by the dental professional researchers. The introduction of an oral hygiene behaviour change intervention significantly reduced gingivitis in volunteer patients compared to control at 3 months. Swapping to a power-brush significantly favoured BOP reduction compared to manual brush continuation although plaque reduction did not follow expectation in comparison to BOP scores. Behaviour change techniques should routinely be considered in patient care. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Plaque-induced gingivitis is highly prevalent in the UK despite being preventable with good oral hygiene. Its continuum, periodontitis, negative impacts quality of life. This study suggests oral hygiene behavioural interventions (GPS) significantly reduce gingivitis and that GPS introduction will improve oral health and may improve quality of life.

Randomised controlled trial of a microneedle patch with a topical anaesthetic for relieving the pain of dental injections.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a microneedle patch combined with 5% topical lidocaine reduces dental injection pain more than a patch without microneedles combined with 5% topical lidocaine. METHODS: This proof of principle randomised, two-treatment, double-blind, crossover split-unit design study in 16 healthy participants investigated levels of perceived pain from 3 increasing pain provoking challenges, when topical 5% lidocaine dental gel was applied to the oral mucosa with a microneedle patch and a patch with no microneedles, prior to infiltration with local anaesthesia on 2 visits. Pain was assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) and 4-point verbal rating scale (VRS). RESULTS: 15 participants completed the study. Mean pain scores, lower at buccal sites, increased in both groups across challenges 1-3: Test palatal 5.1, 11.9, 26.8; buccal 0.7, 2.8, 18.3; Control palatal 12.3, 18.7, 39.5; buccal 4.0, 6.9, 30.6. The microneedle patch plus lidocaine significantly lowered VAS pain scores at both sites for all challenges, the biggest mean difference seen palatally after challenge 3 (12.7, p < 0.001). VRS pain scores were also significantly reduced for test compared to control for all 3 challenges (p = 0.014). Buccal scores favoured the microneedle patch, significantly for pain challenge 3 (p = 0.025). No adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Prior oral application of a microneedle patch combined with 5% topical lidocaine gel reduced the pain experienced from dental infiltration. Microneedle patch use in the dental setting offers the prospect of improving degree and depth of anaesthesia from topically applied anaesthetic gel, without itself causing any pain. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Dental injections are associated with fear and anxiety. Application of a microneedle patch, combined with topical anaesthetic, to the oral mucosa prior to delivery of the injection reduces the pain from this dental procedure. This novel technique may allay patients' apprehension of local anaesthesia and improve quality of life outcomes.

A randomised controlled trial to determine patient experience of a magnetostrictive stack scaler as compared to a piezoelectric scaler, in supportive periodontal therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the pain/discomfort experienced by patients in supportive periodontal therapy, following treatment with a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler, designed for use with warmed water irrigation, and a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler. METHODS: This was a single-centre, randomised, split mouth study with regard to side, and crossover with regard to treatment order. Patients attending general dental practice for supportive periodontal therapy were randomised to receive treatment from one scaler on the left and the other scaler on the right-hand side of the mouth, the left side of the mouth always being treated first. The piezo scaler (Tigon+®) was used with room temperature irrigation for half of the participants (approx 20 °C) and warmed water irrigation (approx 36 °C) for the other half. The magnetostrictive scaler (Cavitron Select SPS 30K®) was used with room temperature irrigation (approx 20 °C) only. Participants rated their pain/discomfort, noise and vibration by VAS scale. RESULTS: 140 participants completed the study. Mean VAS scores for all measures were significantly better for the piezo scaler used with warm irrigation as compared to the magnetostrictive scaler p < 0.001. When both scalers were used with room temperature irrigant, there were no significant differences in the VAS scores between scalers (pain/discomfort, p = 0.68; noise p = 0.2; vibration p = 0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Participants indicated to statistical significance, less pain/discomfort, noise and vibration when the piezo scaler (Tigon+®) device was used with warmed irrigant, compared to the magnetostrictive scaler (Cavitron Select SPS 30K®). There were no significant differences between the instruments when room temperature irrigant was used. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Regular scaling in supportive periodontal therapy, is essential for maintenance of susceptible patients, however it can be painful due to dentine hypersensitivity deterring patients from attending. Using a piezo scaler with warm water improves patient quality of life and subsequent oral health. This may have positive effects on patient attendance. ISRCTN REGISTERED: ISRCTN15573995.

The Efficacy of Plasma Rich in Growth Factors for the Treatment of Alveolar Osteitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF; BTI Biotechnology Institute, San Antonio, Spain) for the treatment of alveolar osteitis compared with a positive control (Alvogyl; Septodont, Maidstone, Kent, UK). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center, single-blinded, randomized, 2-treatment, parallel study was conducted in a UK dental hospital. All healthy adults who presented with alveolar osteitis after tooth extraction over a 3-month period were invited to participate. Each socket was randomized and treated with 1 of 2 treatment modalities, a test treatment (PRGF) or a positive control (Alvogyl). After treatment, patients were reviewed at 3 and 7 days by a second clinician blinded to the treatment given. Outcome measures included pain, exposed bone, inflammation, halitosis, dysgeusia, and quality-of-life assessment. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with data from 44 sockets (22 in the PRGF group and 22 in the Alvogyl group) were analyzed. The PRGF group showed significantly faster bone coverage and significantly decreased inflammation and halitosis (P < .05) compared with the control group receiving Alvogyl. There was no significant difference for pain, quality-of-life measures, or dysgeusia between groups. CONCLUSION: PRGF predictably treated alveolar osteitis after tooth extraction compared with the conventional standard treatment of Alvogyl, which has been used for many years. PRGF could be considered an alternative treatment for alveolar osteitis and indeed appears to have considerable advantages over Alvogyl.

Randomised clinical trial to evaluate changes in dentine tubule occlusion following 4 weeks use of an occluding toothpaste.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to determine whether a silicone impression material could precisely replicate dentine tubule changes following 4 weeks toothbrushing with occluding or non-occluding toothpaste and whether changes reflected hypersensitivity clinical assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single site, examiner blind, parallel, two treatment arm, randomised clinical trial. Participants were healthy, ≥18, with ≥1 sensitive tooth with exposed dentine, Schiff sensitivity score ≥2, and patent tubules with dentine occlusion score 4-5 as determined by scanning electron microscopy of replica impressions. Nine participants received Sensodyne® Rapid Relief (occluding toothpaste) and 10 Crest® Decay Prevention (non-occluding toothpaste), and were re-evaluated for sensitivity and occlusion score after two timed minutes and 4 weeks twice-daily home brushing. RESULTS: Occlusion scores did not correlate significantly with pain scores, but correlations were positive and impressions showed characteristic dentine tubule patency and occlusion. After 4 weeks, thermal VAS was significantly lower than baseline for the non-occluding toothpaste; all other pain scores were significantly lower for both treatments. Dentine occlusion scores also decreased after 4 weeks of either treatment, but did not achieve significance (p = 0.0625). CONCLUSIONS: Both toothpastes reduced clinical sensitivity and increased tubule occlusion. It is hypothesised that during impression, taking some material may have sheared off and occluded tubules resulting in false positives. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study has demonstrated that a silicone impression material can accurately replicate the dentine surface to demonstrate dentine tubular occlusion and patency; however, although the association between occlusion and pain score was positive, this technique needs to be refined before use in future studies.

Randomized controlled trial to study plaque inhibition in calcium sodium phosphosilicate dentifrices.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of three calcium sodium phosphosilicate (CSPS)/sodium monofluorophosphate containing dentifrices, compared to positive and negative controls on plaque re-growth in a non-brushing model, after 4 days of twice daily use, as determined by plaque area and Turesky plaque index (TPI). METHODS: This was an exploratory, single-centre, examiner-blind, randomised, controlled, five treatment period, crossover, plaque re-growth study, with supervised use of study products. Twenty-three healthy adult volunteers were randomized to receive experimental 5% CSPS dentifrice; two marketed 5% CSPS dentifrices; active comparator mouthrinse and negative control dentifrice. At the start of each treatment period, zero plaque was established by dental prophylaxis and study products were dispensed as either dentifrice slurries or mouthrinse, twice daily for the next 4 days. No other forms of oral hygiene were permitted. After 96h, supra-gingival plaque was determined by plaque area (direct entry, planimetric method) and TPI. Changes from zero plaque were analysed. RESULTS: For both measures, plaque re-growth at 96h was significantly lower following treatment with active comparator mouthrinse and significantly higher following treatment with the experimental 5% CSPS dentifrice, compared to all other treatments. There were no statistically significant differences between the three other treatments, except between the marketed 5% CSPS dentifrices, for overall plaque area. CONCLUSIONS: The comparator mouthwash was significantly more effective at preventing plaque accumulation than the dentifrice slurries. The three marketed dentifrices contained sodium lauryl sulphate and were more effective at reducing plaque re-growth than the experimental dentifrice formulated with a tegobetaine/adinol surfactant system. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The CSPS containing dentifrices tested in this study showed no significant chemical-therapeutic anti-plaque benefits compared to a negative control dentifrice. However, sodium lauryl sulphate-containing dentifrices controlled plaque more effectively than a tegobetaine/adinol-containing CSPS dentifrice suggesting that the impact of surfactant selection on anti-plaque activity of formulations warrants further investigation.