Survival curves to support quality improvement in hospitals with excess 30-day mortality after acute myocardial infarction, cerebral stroke and hip fracture: a before-after study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate survival curves (Kaplan-Meier) as a means of identifying areas in the clinical pathway amenable to quality improvement. DESIGN: Observational before-after study. SETTING: In Norway, annual public reporting of nationwide 30-day in-and-out-of-hospital mortality (30D) for three medical conditions started in 2011: first time acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke and hip fracture; reported for 2009. 12 of 61 hospitals had statistically significant lower/higher mortality compared with the hospital mean. PARTICIPANTS: Three hospitals with significantly higher mortality requested detailed analyses for quality improvement purposes: Telemark Hospital Trust Skien (AMI and stroke), Østfold Hospital Trust Fredrikstad (stroke), Innlandet Hospital Trust Gjøvik (hip fracture). OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival curves, crude and risk-adjusted 30D before (2008-2009) and after (2012-2013). INTERVENTIONS: Unadjusted survival curves for the outlier hospitals were compared to curves based on pooled data from the other hospitals for the 30-day period 2008-2009. For patients admitted with AMI (Skien), stroke (Fredrikstad) and hip fracture (Gjøvik), the curves suggested increased mortality from the initial part of the clinical pathway. For stroke (Skien), increased mortality appeared after about 8 days. The curve profiles were thought to reflect suboptimal care in various phases in the clinical pathway. This informed improvement efforts. RESULTS: For 2008-2009, hospital-specific curves differed from other hospitals: borderline significant for AMI (p=0.064), highly significant (p≤0.005) for the remainder. After intervention, no difference was found (p>0.188). Before-after comparison of the curves within each hospital revealed a significant change for Fredrikstad (p=0.006). For the three hospitals, crude 30D declined and they were non-outliers for risk-adjusted 30D for 2013. CONCLUSIONS: Survival curves as a supplement to 30D may be useful for identifying suboptimal care in the clinical pathway, and thus informing design of quality improvement projects.

Conversion of knee fusion to total arthroplasty: complications in 8 patients.

BACKGROUND: There are no clear indications for conversion of knee fusion to total arthroplasty. In this paper we report outcome and complications in 8 patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed 8 total knee arthroplasties after takedown of previous fusion 24-55 months after the conversion. The original diagnoses were complications following injury in 3 patients, rheumatoid arthritis in 3, complication after chondromalacia in 1 patient and tuberculous arthritis in 1 patient. The age at operation ranged from 31 to 67 years. The time since arthrodesis ranged from 1 to 49 years. RESULTS: 5 patients had to undergo reoperation for postoperative complications. 2 patients experienced recurrence of previous deep infection, which led to thigh amputation in one and chronic fistulation in the other. Only 1 patient had an uneventful course after the conversion procedure, but he died later on due to a heart attack. As another patient also died of cardiovascular disease, 5 of the 8 patients were available for evaluation of knee function. In these patients the knee flexion ranged from 90 to 120 degrees, extension lag ranged from 10 to 40 degrees, and all knees were aligned at 6 to 8 degrees of valgus. The Knee Society clinical scores ranged from 47 to 74, the Womac scores ranged from 9 to 47, and EuroQol ranged from 0.1 to 0.8. INTERPRETATION: Our findings indicate that conversion of knee arthrodesis to total arthroplasty should only be performed in selected cases, and after giving the patient extensive information about the high risk of rather serious complications.