Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Surg ; 196(3): 339-45, 2008 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18585676

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) is diagnosed in 4% to 10% of directional vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsies (DVABs) performed for microcalcifications. Since the underestimation rate varies from 7% to 36%, surgical excision is still recommended, although some authors have tried to identify a subset of patients who can be spared surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this study, we analyzed a retrospective series of 300 patients with ADH on 11-gauge DVAB. The only 4 events that occurred (3%) in 135 of 184 patients (61%) who were followed may not be due to underestimation. Comparing the diagnoses on DVAB and surgical excisions for 116 patients (39%), we identified 3 subsets of patients: no underestimation (size <6 mm and complete removal), low rate of 4% (< or =2 foci ADH in microcalcifications either <6 mm with incomplete removal or > or =6 mm and <21 mm), and high rate of 36% to 38% (>2 foci ADH in microcalcifications either <6 mm with incomplete removal or > or =6 mm and <21 mm, lesion size > or =21 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that strict follow-up can be a safe option for the first 2 groups of patients, but that surgical excision is mandatory for patients from the third group.


Assuntos
Doenças Mamárias/patologia , Mama/patologia , Calcinose/patologia , Biópsia por Agulha , Doenças Mamárias/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Calcinose/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Humanos , Hiperplasia , Mamografia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Técnicas Estereotáxicas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...