Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BJU Int ; 98(1): 205-16, 2006 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16831170

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in gene expression levels between renal cell carcinoma (RCC) tissue and 'normal' appearing renal tissue using a commercially available DNA macroarray. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tissue was obtained from 47 consecutive radical nephrectomies, 29 of which were eligible. DNA macroarrays were analysed on the tumour and normal-appearing control tissue to measure the expression of 1185 cancer-related genes. The group of samples was also stratified according to the presence or absence of granular cells and according to tumour grade. Quantitative real-time polymerase-chain reaction (PCR) was also performed on seven key genes present on the macroarray. RESULTS: In all, 444 genes were over-expressed and 33 genes were under-expressed. Using selection criteria reduced the list to nine that were significantly over-expressed and 23 that were under-expressed. These significant genes belonged to the families of oncogenes, growth factors, interleukins, receptors, immune system components, cytoskeleton, matrix proteins and intracellular modulators, or they coded for proteins involved in DNA transcription and RNA translation, DNA repair, protein turnover, and metabolism of carbohydrates and lipids. There were differences in gene expression according to the presence or absence of granular cells and according to tumour grade. Using quantitative real-time PCR there was over-expression of epidermal growth factor receptor, c-myc, transforming growth factor-alpha, vascular endothelial growth factor and vimentin, and under-expression of TYRO3 protein tyrosine kinase. The von Hippel-Lindau gene was under-expressed but not significantly. CONCLUSIONS: A procedure for collecting and storing fresh renal tissue and subsequent gene expression profiling of RCC and normal renal tissue was established. A commercially available DNA macroarray coupled with the significance analysis of macroarrays allowed the identification of sets of differentially expressed cancer-related genes that were characteristic of RCC, compared with apparently normal renal tissue, and which distinguished among subgroups divided according to tumour grade and histological subtype. Quantitative PCR is important to validate the results of macroarray experiments.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/genética , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica/métodos , Neoplasias Renais/genética , DNA de Neoplasias/análise , DNA de Neoplasias/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise de Sequência com Séries de Oligonucleotídeos
2.
Environ Health Perspect ; 114(3): 420-9, 2006 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16507466

RESUMO

This is the report of the first workshop "Validation of Toxicogenomics-Based Test Systems" held 11-12 December 2003 in Ispra, Italy. The workshop was hosted by the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) and organized jointly by ECVAM, the U.S. Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM), and the National Toxicology Program (NTP) Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM). The primary aim of the workshop was for participants to discuss and define principles applicable to the validation of toxicogenomics platforms as well as validation of specific toxicologic test methods that incorporate toxicogenomics technologies. The workshop was viewed as an opportunity for initiating a dialogue between technologic experts, regulators, and the principal validation bodies and for identifying those factors to which the validation process would be applicable. It was felt that to do so now, as the technology is evolving and associated challenges are identified, would be a basis for the future validation of the technology when it reaches the appropriate stage. Because of the complexity of the issue, different aspects of the validation of toxicogenomics-based test methods were covered. The three focus areas include a) biologic validation of toxicogenomics-based test methods for regulatory decision making, b) technical and bioinformatics aspects related to validation, and c) validation issues as they relate to regulatory acceptance and use of toxicogenomics-based test methods. In this report we summarize the discussions and describe in detail the recommendations for future direction and priorities.


Assuntos
Toxicogenética/legislação & jurisprudência , Alternativas aos Testes com Animais/legislação & jurisprudência , Biologia Computacional , Regulamentação Governamental , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Testes de Toxicidade/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...