Staggered enforcement of infection control and prevention measures following four consecutive potential laboratory exposures to imported Brucella melitensis.

From 2015 until 2020, Brucella melitensis was isolated four times in our microbiology laboratory. All patients had travelled in endemic-areas. Immediately after the first occurrence, all laboratory staff were risk-stratified and preventive and protective measures were applied according to CDC guidelines. Nineteen workers were exposed and needed chemoprophylaxis and follow-up. At each subsequent occurrence, risk analysis was performed, and additional measures were implemented accordingly, leading to a progressive reduction of exposed staff members to none the fourth time. We describe here the additional measures that permitted this important exposure reduction.

A case report of serious haemolysis in a glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase-deficient COVID-19 patient receiving hydroxychloroquine.

While the COVID-19 epidemic occurred since December 2019, as of end April 2020, no treatment has been validated or invalidated by accurate clinical trials. Use of hydroxychloroquine has been popularised on mass media and put forward as a valid treatment option without strong evidence of efficacy. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has its own side effects, some of which are very serious like acute haemolysis in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficient patients. Side effects may be worse than the disease itself. Belgian national treatment guidelines recommend the use of HCQ in mild to severe COVID-19 disease. As opinions, politics, media and beliefs are governing COVID-19 therapy, performance of randomised controlled blinded clinical trials became difficult. Results of sound clinical trials are eagerly awaited. We report a case of acute haemolysis leading to admission in intensive care unit and renal failure in a patient with uncovered G6PD deficiency.

Disrupted trabecular bone micro-architecture in middle-aged male HIV-infected treated patients.

OBJECTIVES: HIV-infected individuals are at increased risk of incident fractures. Evaluation of trabecular bone micro-architecture is an important tool to assess bone strength, but its use has not yet been reported in middle-aged HIV-infected male individuals. The aim of the study was to compare bone micro-architecture between HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected men. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 53 HIV-infected male individuals with a mean (± standard deviation) age of 49 ± 9 years who had been receiving antiretroviral therapy including tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DF) for at least 60 months were compared with 50 HIV-uninfected male controls, matched for age and ethnic origin. We studied the volumetric bone density and micro-architecture of the radius and tibia using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-p QCT). RESULTS: Volumetric trabecular bone density was 17% lower in the tibia (P < 10(-4) ) and 16% lower in the radius (P < 10(-3) ) in HIV-infected patients compared with controls. By contrast, the cortical bone density was normal at both sites. The tibial trabecular micro-architecture differed markedly between patients and controls: bone volume/total volume (BV/TV) and trabecular number were each 13% lower (P < 10(-4) for both). Trabecular separation and inhomogeneity of the network were 18% and 24% higher in HIV-infected patients than in controls, respectively. The radial BV/TV and trabecular thickness were each 13% lower (P < 10(-3) and 10(-2) , respectively). Cortical thickness was not different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of lower volumetric trabecular bone density and disrupted trabecular micro-architectural parameters in middle-aged male HIV-infected treated patients help to explain bone frailty in these patients.

Isoniazid preventive therapy for people living with HIV: public health challenges and implementation issues.

Isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) is recognised as an important component of collaborative tuberculosis (TB) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) activities to reduce the burden of TB in people living with HIV (PLHIV). However, there has been little in the way of IPT implementation at country level. This failure has resulted in a recent call to arms under the banner title of the 'Three I's' (infection control to prevent nosocomial transmission of TB in health care settings, intensified TB case finding and IPT). In this paper, we review the background of IPT. We then discuss the important challenges of IPT in PLHIV, namely responsibility and accountability for the implementation, identification of latent TB infection, exclusion of active TB and prevention of isoniazid resistance, length of treatment and duration of protective efficacy. We also highlight several research questions that currently remain unanswered. We finally offer practical suggestions about how to scale up IPT in the field, including the need to integrate IPT into a package of care for PLHIV, the setting up of operational projects with the philosophy of 'learning while doing', the development of flow charts for eligibility for IPT, the development and implementation of care prior to antiretroviral treatment, and finally issues around procurement, distribution, monitoring and evaluation. We support the implementation of IPT, but only if it is done in a safe and structured way. There is a definite risk that 'sloppy' IPT will be inefficient and, worse, could lead to the development of multidrug-resistant TB, and this must be avoided at all costs.

Database-supported teleconferencing: an additional clinical mentoring tool to assist a multinational company HIV/AIDS treatment program in Africa.

BACKGROUND: The lack of human resources for health is presently recognized as a major factor limiting scale-up of antiretroviral treatment (ART) programs in resourcelimited settings. The mobilization of public and private partners, the decentralization of care, and the training of non-HIV specialist nurses and general practitioners could help increase the number of HIV-infected patients receiving ART. In addition to other forms of training, scheduled teleconferences (TCs) have been organized to support a comprehensive HIV treatment program delivered by a private company's health team. OBJECTIVE: To describe the role of the TC as an additional tool in mentoring a company's health care workers (HCWs). METHOD: For this study, all TC reports were retrospectively reviewed and the questions classified by topic. Participating Heineken physicians evaluated the technical quality and scientific relevance of the TCs through an anonymous survey. RESULTS: From October 2001 to December 2003, 10 HCWs working in 14 operating companies in 5 African countries raised 268 problems during 45 TCs. A total of 79 questions (29%) were asked about antiretroviral (ARV) therapy, 53 (20%) about the diagnosis and treatment of opportunistic infection, 43 (16%) about ARV toxicity, 40 (15%) about care organization and policy, 32 (12%) about laboratory or drug supply, and 21 (8%) about biological parameters. The mean TC attendance rate was 70%. The level of satisfaction among local company physicians was 65% for logistics, 89% for scientific relevance, 84% for applicability of advice, and 85% overall. The most common complaints concerned the poor quality of the telephone connection and language problems for francophone participants. CONCLUSION: Database-supported teleconferencing could be an additional tool to mentor company HCWs in their routine care of HIV-infected workers and family members. The role and costeffectiveness of telemedicine in improving health outcomes should be further studied.

Management of adults living with HIV/AIDS in low-income, high-burden settings, with special reference to persons with tuberculosis.

Because of the increasing availability of antiretroviral (ARV) agents for HIV in low-income countries, many clinicians now need training on their use. This is especially true for clinicians caring for individuals with tuberculosis (TB), given its close relationship with HIV/AIDS. This article summarizes the key decisions facing clinicians who manage HIV-infected persons, with particular reference to issues regarding those dually infected with TB. Health care provider-initiated diagnostic testing using rapid HIV tests should be offered to all individuals with symptoms and signs suggesting HIV infection, including all persons with TB. Issues to be included in pre- and post-test counseling sessions are discussed. HIV-infected patients should be evaluated to determine clinical staging of HIV; certain laboratory examinations should ideally be performed to assess the degree of immunosuppression and to aid decisions about when best to start ARV therapy and preventive therapies. The recommended ARV regimens and guidance on proposed patient follow-up are presented. Good adherence to ARVs is required and factors that induce and reinforce compliance are suggested. The treatment of TB is a high priority, and follows the same principles whether the patient is HIV-infected or not. Suggestions are made about ARV use in patients with TB. A standardized and complementary information system should be developed to monitor management of HIV-TB patients and performance of joint TB and HIV care efforts. By diagnosing and managing additional HIV cases detected through the portal of the TB control programme, clinicians will contribute to diminishing the burden of HIV, and thus, TB.

Efficacy, safety and predictive factors of virological success of a boosted amprenavir-based salvage regimen in heavily antiretroviral-experienced HIV-1-infected patients.

BACKGROUND: Amprenavir (APV) has been shown to be effective in naive or treatment-experienced HIV-1 infected patients. However, the safety and efficacy of the APV 600 mg/ritonavir (RTV) 100 mg twice a day (bid) combination, the usually recommended dosage for boosted APV, have been less well studied. We assessed the predictive factors associated with virological success of APV/RTV-based regimens. METHODS: Patients in the PharmAdapt study receiving an APV/RTV-containing regimen were included in the study. The predictivity of covariates on virological response at 4 months was analysed according to the data analysis plan. We processed logistic regression using bootstrapping to allow several covariates in the models. RESULTS: Forty patients received an APV/RTV-containing regimen, 38 of whom were male (95%). Risk factors were heterosexual contacts (four patients; 10%), homosexual contacts (31 patients; 78%), and intravenous drug use (four patients; 10%). Twenty-seven per cent of patients were Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Classification System (CDC) stage A, 38% were stage B and 35% were stage C. The median baseline CD4 count was 313 cells/microL [interquartile range (IQR) 211, 414], and the median baseline viral load was 4.4 log(10) HIV-1 RNA copies/mL (IQR 3.7, 4.9). Patients were exposed to a median number of 7.5 (IQR 6, 9) drugs for a median number of 3.8 (IQR 3.3, 4.3) years. The baseline number of resistance mutations was 4 [IQR 3, 5 for nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), 1 (IQR 0, 2)] for non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) and 6 [IQR 5, 8 for protease inhibitors (PIs)]. At month 4, median viral load decreased to 1.2 log(10) copies/mL (IQR 0.3, 1.6); 50% of patients had a viral load<200 copies/mL by intention-to-treat analysis. The number of APV resistance mutations was associated with viral load changes. Median APV concentration was 1750 ng/mL (IQR 1130, 2520). At month 4, using several cut-offs, neither APV concentration nor the genotypic inhibitory quotient was predictive of viral load changes. Baseline viral load and the number of protease mutations were associated with outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacious APV concentrations need to be determined for antiretroviral-experienced patients. Baseline viral load and the number of mutations on the protease coding region (PRO) were associated with the virological outcome of APV/RTV-based regimens.

Updated European recommendations for the clinical use of HIV drug resistance testing.

In most European countries, HIV drug resistance testing has become a routine clinical tool. However, its practical implementation in a clinical context is demanding. The European HIV Drug Resistance Panel was established to make recommendations to clinicians and virologists on this topic and to propose quality control measures. The panel recommends resistance testing for the following indications: i) drug-naive patients with acute or recent infection; ii) therapy failure, including suboptimal treatment response, when treatment change is considered; iii) pregnant HIV-1-infected women and paediatric patients with detectable viral load when treatment initiation or change is considered; and iv) genotype source patient when post-exposure prophylaxis is considered. In addition, for drug-naive patients with chronic infection in whom treatment is to be started, the panel suggests that resistance testing should be strongly considered and recommends testing the earliest sample for drug resistance if suspicion of resistance is high or prevalence of resistance in this population exceeds 10%. The panel does not favour genotyping over phenotype, however it is anticipated that genotyping will be used more often because of its greater accessibility, lower cost and faster turnaround time. For the interpretation of resistance data, clinically validated systems should be used to the greatest extent possible. It is mandatory that laboratories performing HIV resistance tests take regular part in quality assurance programs. Similarly, it is necessary that HIV clinicians and virologists take part in continuous education and meet regularly to discuss problematic clinical cases. Indeed, resistance test results should be used in the context of all other clinically relevant information for predicting therapy response. The panel also encourages the timely collection of epidemiological information to estimate the impact of transmission of resistant HIV and the prevalence of HIV-1 non-B subtypes in the different European countries.

Impact of various antiretroviral drugs and their plasma concentrations on plasma lipids in heavily pretreated HIV-infected patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the frequency and the magnitude of lipid abnormalities (LA) in respect to the nature of the antiretroviral drug and its plasma concentrations. PATIENTS/METHOD: Trough concentrations (C(trough)) of protease inhibitors (PIs) and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) were assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 24, 28, and 32. Fasting triglycerides (TG) and total cholesterol (CH) were sampled at Weeks 0, 12, 20, and 32. We analyzed the probability of occurrence of grade 3-4 CH (> 7.8 mmol/L) and TG (> 8.4 mmol/L) during a 24-week period according to the drug taken using a Kaplan-Meier analysis and log rank test. Relation between Week 8 PI or NNRTI C(trough) and Week 12 lipid levels was assessed using the Kendall correlation measure. RESULTS: The PharmAdapt study included 252 patients (mean age 41 years, 83% males); the patients received a PI (73%), an NNRTI (50%), and/or a ritonavir (RTV) booster-containing (46%) regimen. Compared to any other regimen, use of lopinavir (LPV)/RTV or efavirenz (EFV) was associated with a higher risk of grade 3-4 CH. Use of LPV/RTV and RTV booster was associated with a higher risk of grade 3-4 TG. Use of any PI-containing regimen was associated with a higher risk for grade 3-4 CH and TG compared to non PI-based regimens. Kendall correlation coefficients for PI or NNRTI C(trough) and blood lipid levels were close to zero for all drugs and CH or TG, showing the absence of relation between drug concentrations and lipid levels. CONCLUSION: Severity of lipid abnormalities is related to the nature of the antiretroviral drug. There is no short-term relation between PI or NNRTI trough concentrations and blood lipid levels in heavily pretreated patients.

Variable virological outcomes according to the center providing antiretroviral therapy within the PharmAdapt clinical trial.

PURPOSE: Differences in virological response between HIV-infected patients at different study centers were analyzed as a substudy of PharmAdapt, a multicenter prospective randomized study to evaluate the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring after a genotypic-based treatment adaptation. RESULTS: After 12 weeks, the percentage of patients participating in PharmAdapt with HIV RNA < 200 copies/mL ranged from 17% to 69% between centers providing antiretroviral care. In a multivariate analysis, independent factors predictive of viral load <200 HIV RNA copies/mL at Week 12 included: lower baseline viral load, lower nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance, lower protease inhibitor resistance, and the center providing antiretroviral therapy. To evaluate the final factor, study sites were divided into two groups based on Week 12 HIV RNA values above or below the median. CONCLUSION: Using this definition, observed differences between centers included the use of stavudine, abacavir-, and/or efavirenz-based regimens and use of online expert advice.

HIV resistance to antiretroviral drugs: mechanisms, genotypic and phenotypic resistance testing in clinical practice.

HIV resistance to antiretroviral agents is a major contributory cause of treatment failure. The dynamics of HIV replication, together with patient-, physician-, and drug-related factors, lead to emergence of HIV resistant strains in most of the patients. Phenotypic assays look for an increase in the antiretroviral drug (ARV) concentration that inhibits 50% of the growth of the tested HIV strain (IC50), comparatively with a reference strain cultivated in parallel. Genotypic tests detect resistance mutations in the reverse transcriptase and protease genes by comparing the gene sequences of a resistant virus to those of a wild-type strain that has previously been described. The efficacy of each ARV class and each individual ARV is threatened by specific mutations and resistance mechanisms. In retrospective studies of genotypic or phenotypic resistance testing, baseline resistance tests results were correlated with virological outcomes. There is some evidence from prospective studies that resistance testing may have some benefits when used to choose salvage regimens. However, problems in the areas of test interpretation, patient compliance, availability of active drugs, and technical test performance limit the usefulness of resistance testing in clinical practice. This article reviews the mechanisms underlying HIV resistance, the principles of phenotypic and genotypic tests, and the use of these tests in clinical practice.

Intracellular concentration of protease inhibitors in HIV-1-infected patients: correlation with MDR-1 gene expression and low dose of ritonavir.

BACKGROUND: Protease inhibitors (PIs) are substrates for the P-glycoprotein (P-gp/170) encoded by the multi-drug resistance gene (MDR-1). HIV infection is associated with increased expression of P-gp. The role of MDR gene overexpression in clinical pharmacokinetics is not known. METHOD: We determined by HPLC, at trough and peak levels, the current PI concentrations in plasma (P) and in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) (intracellular concentration [IC]) from 49 HIV-infected patients receiving different treatment combinations: nelfinavir ([NFV] n = 12); indinavir ([IDV] n = 10); amprenavir ([APV] n = 5); ritonavir (RTV) 100 bid/IDV 800 mg bid (n = 6); RTV 400 bid/IDV 400 mg bid (n = 3); RTV 100 bid/saquinavir (SQV) 600 mg tid (n = 9); APV 600 bid/RTV 100 mg bid (n = 4). We determined the mean ratio of intracellular/plasma PI concentration for each treatment group. The MDR-1 gene expression was determined by a semi-quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). HIV viral load was simultaneously measured. RESULTS: 49 patients (mean age 41 +/- 8.7 years; mean CD4 cell count 418 [57-972]; mean HIV RNA 2.1 +/- 0.8 log(10)) were included in the study. Patients who overexpressed the MDR-1 gene had significantly lower trough intracellular PI levels (p =.02) or lower intracellular accumulation of PI (p =.042). Patients treated with low-dose RTV in combined regimens with detectable RTV intracellular concentration showed lack of MDR-1 gene expression (p =.01). Patients with HIV RNA < 40 copies/mL had significantly higher RTV intracellular accumulation (p =.029). CONCLUSION: In HIV-infected patients, IC of PI is inversely correlated with MDR-1 gene overexpression. Undetectable viral load was associated with the use of low-dose RTV, probably linked to better intracellular accumulation of the drug. Nevertheless, further investigation is needed to confirm these results.

Acute renal failure as initial presentation of visceral leishmaniasis in an HIV-1-infected patient.

We report the case of an HIV-infected patient who presented with acute renal failure due to visceral leishmaniasis (VL). Although renal failure is the leading cause of death in dogs, the natural reservoir of Leishmania infantum, renal involvement is usually absent in human VL. However, L. infantum can be considered a cause of renal failure in HIV-infected patients.

Iatrogenic Cushing's syndrome in an HIV-infected patient treated with inhaled corticosteroids (fluticasone propionate) and low dose ritonavir enhanced PI containing regimen.

In HIV-infected patients, ritonavir, a potent cytochrome P450 inhibitor, is increasingly used to improve the pharmacokinetic profile of the associated protease inhibitor. HIV physicians are often faced with potential drug-drug interaction while treating associated diseases. We report the case of an HIV-infected patient with clinical features of Cushing's syndrome due to the interaction of low dose ritonavir with inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP). Safety of life-long CYP450 inhibition has still to be demonstrated.

Prevalence of nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) resistance-associated mutations and polymorphisms in NNRTI-naïve HIV-infected patients.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of treatment containing nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) could be compromised in NNRTI-naïve patients already harboring a virus resistant to NNRTIs. On the contrary, hypersusceptibility to NNRTIs in patients having failed nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-containing regimens has been described and has been associated with improved outcome. METHOD: We assessed the prevalence of NNRTI resistance-associated mutations or polymorphisms in 146 antiretroviral-naïve patients and in 181 HIV-infected patients who were given an NNRTI-based regimen. We phenotypically evaluated the NNRTI susceptibility of 41 strains presenting with amino acid substitutions at positions involved in NNRTI resistance. RESULTS: In the 268 genotypically analyzable samples, the overall prevalence of NNRTI resistance-associated mutations was 2% (6/268 patients). The prevalence of strains with amino acid substitutions at reverse transcriptase (RT) gene positions (A98, K101, K103, V106, V108, V179) involved in NNRTI resistance was 15%. Hypersusceptibility to NNRTI was rare (2%, 1/41) in those samples. RT substitutions at positions involved in NNRTI resistance were not associated with a significantly worse virologic outcome in NNRTI-treated patients. Our understanding of small shifts in IC50 values (higher or lower) toward NNRTI is very limited. The significance of many RT mutations on NNRTI susceptibility is not clear. CONCLUSION: In contrast to resistance mutations, RT substitutions at positions involved in NNRTI resistance are frequent. They are not associated with a worse virologic outcome or with decreased phenotypic susceptibility to NNRTIs. It may be prudent not to rule out the use of NNRTIs in patients with small shifts in IC50 values or poorly understood mutations.

Ceftazidime- and imipenem-induced endotoxin release during treatment of gram-negative infections.

To determine whether ceftazidime and imipenem, which target two different penicillin-binding proteins, result in different amounts of endotoxin and cytokine release in patients with gram-negative infection, plasma endotoxin, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor alpha were measured during the first 24 h of antibiotic therapy in 27 patients with gram-negative infection who had been randomized to receive either ceftazidime 2 g t.i.d. (n=12) or imipenem/cilastatin 1 g t.i.d. (n=15). The source of infection was the digestive tract (n=13), the urinary tract (n=5), the respiratory tract (n=2), soft tissue (n=2), i.v. line (n=2), or other (n=3). After the first antibiotic injection, a significant increase in the median concentration of plasma interleukin-6 and plasma tumor necrosis factor alpha was noted, without significant differences related to the antibiotic administered. Antibiotic-induced endotoxemia was detectable in nine patients (including 7 with bacteremia). In conclusion, ceftazidime and imipenem had similar effects on endotoxin and cytokine release during the treatment of gram-negative infections.

Hepatitis B or hepatitis C virus infection is a risk factor for severe hepatic cytolysis after initiation of a protease inhibitor-containing antiretroviral regimen in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. The APROCO Study Group.

In a cohort of 1,047 human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients started on protease inhibitors (PIs), the incidence of severe hepatic cytolysis (alanine aminotransferase concentration five times or more above the upper limit of the normal level >/= 5N) was 5% patient-years after a mean follow-up of 5 months. Only positivity for hepatitis C virus antibodies (hazard ratio [HR], 7. 95; P < 10(-3)) or hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HR, 6.67; P < 10(-3)) was associated with severe cytolysis. Before starting patients on PIs, assessment of liver enzyme levels and viral coinfections is necessary.