Enteral Feedings Do Not Increase the Risk of NEC in ELBW Infants Undergoing Treatment of Patent Ductus Arteriosus With Acetaminophen.

OBJECTIVE: Acetaminophen (APAP) is an alternative to indomethacin and ibuprofen for treatment of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). The side effect profile of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) presents enteral feeding safety concerns; however, the safety of enteral feeding on APAP is largely unknown. Optimal feeding strategies during pharmacological PDA treatment are unknown, leading to practice variation. This study aims to assess the incidence of adverse gastrointestinal (GI) outcomes in neonates treated with APAP for PDA closure while receiving enteral feedings. METHODS: Single-center retrospective cohort study of 59 extremely low birth weight (ELBW), premature neonates who received APAP for PDA treatment divided into Low Volume (LV; ≤ 20 mL/kg/day) and High Volume (HV; > 20 mL/kg/day) enteral feeding groups. The primary outcome was the incidence of any suspected or confirmed necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Timing of nutrition milestones, parenteral nutrition (PN) days, and adverse outcomes (feeding intolerance, liver dysfunction, death prior to discharge) were evaluated. RESULTS: The incidence of suspected or confirmed NEC was 19.5% in the LV group and 13.3% in the HV group (p = 0.593). The HV group reached full feeds 6 days sooner (18 vs 24 days, p = 0.024) and had fewer PN days (17 vs 23.5 days, p = 0.044) with no difference in adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Provision of > 20 mL/kg/day of enteral feeds during APAP treatment of PDA decreased time to full feeds and PN days compared to trophic feedings (≤ 20 mL/kg/day) with no difference in adverse GI outcomes. Continuing enteral feeding during APAP PDA treatment appears safe while improving achievement of nutritional milestones.

Effect of a Pharmacist-Led Discharge Counseling Service at a Children's Hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a pharmacist-led discharge counseling service at a pediatric hospital. METHODS: This was a prospective observational cohort study. Patients in the pre-implementation phase were identified by the pharmacist at the time of admission medication reconciliation, whereas patients in the pos-timplementation phase were identified at the time of pharmacist discharge medication counselling. Caregivers were contacted within 2 weeks of the patients' discharge date to complete a 7-question telephone survey. The primary objective was to measure the effect of the pharmacist-led service on caregiver satisfaction, using a pre- and post- implementation telephone survey. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the effect of the service on 90-day medication-related readmissions and determine the change in the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey response (Question 25) regarding discharge medications following implementation of the new service. RESULTS: A total of 32 caregivers were included in both the pre- and post-implementation groups. The most common reason for inclusion was high-risk medications (84%) in the pre-implementation group and device teaching (62.5%) in the post-implementation group. The primary outcome, the average composite score on the telephone survey, was 30.94 ± 3.50 (average ± SD) in the pre-implementation group and 32.5 ± 2.26 in the post-implementation group (p = 0.038). There were no medication-related readmissions within 90 days in either group. The score on HCAHPS Question 25 was not different between groups (p = 0.761). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a pharmacist-led discharge counseling service in pediatric patients improved caregiver satisfaction and understanding as shown by a postdischarge telephone survey.

Effect of a Pharmacist Admission Medication Reconciliation Service at a Children's Hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical effect and estimate cost avoidance attributed to a pharmacist-led admission medication reconciliation service at a children's hospital. METHODS: This was a prospective observational cohort study that measured pharmacist interventions for pediatric patients over a 90-day period. Pharmacists logged all interventions identified during medication reconciliation in real time. Patient demographic data were collected retrospectively. Cost avoidance from prevented adverse drug events (ADEs) was estimated based on previously published literature. RESULTS: Pharmacists completed 283 admission medication reconciliations during the study period. Of those, 69% of medication reconciliations required intervention. Interventions affected care during the hospital admission in 21.9% of patients and 8 medication reconciliations resulted in prevention of a major ADE. This pharmacist-led service resulted in an estimated cost avoidance of $46,746.65 in the 3-month period. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a pharmacist-led admission medication reconciliation service for pediatric patients improved medication safety and resulted in significant cost avoidance, which justifies investment in these pharmacist resources.