RESUMO
Consumer acceptability of beers is influenced by product formulation and processing conditions, which impart unique sensory profiles. This study used multivariate techniques to evaluate at-home consumer sensory acceptability of six commercial beers considering their style, fermentation type, and chemical composition. Samples included top-fermented beers (American India Pale Ale and Stout) and bottom-fermented beers (Pilsner, zero-alcohol Pilsner, Vienna Lager, and Munich Dunkel). Beer consumers (n = 50) conducted sensory hedonic, check-all-that-apply (CATA) and just-about-right (JAR) tests. Chemometric variables included iso-alpha-acids, hordenine, and volatile aromatic compounds, quantified by chromatographic methods, whereas bitterness units (IBU) were determined spectrophotometrically. Lager beers had higher acceptability than top-fermented beer (p < .05) for all attributes. Light-colored beers and medium-height foams had the highest liking scores for visual sensory attributes. Higher concentrations of bitter-tasting molecules, hordenine, and acidity decreased the liking scores of top-fermented (Ale) beers, as a sensory penalty analysis suggested. In contrast, the most favored beers (Pilsners and Munich Dunkel) contained higher fusel alcohol esters linked to fruity aromatic notes. Although a low conversion rate of fatty acids into fruity esters was noted in nonalcoholic Pilsner, its overall liking score was not statistically different from the alcoholic version. However, consumers perceived the nonalcoholic Pilsner as less bitter than its alcoholic counterpart even when IBUs were nonsignificantly different. This study emphasized the significance of understanding beer chemometrics to comprehend consumer acceptability, highlighting the crucial role of bitter molecules. Hence, hordenine, acidity, and volatile contents provided additional and valuable insights into consumer preferences.
